Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider steady one-dimensional heat conduction in a pin fin of constant diameter \(D\) with constant thermal conductivity. The fin is losing heat by convection to the ambient air at \(T_{\infty}\) with a heat transfer coefficient of \(h\). The nodal network of the fin consists of nodes 0 (at the base), 1 (in the middle), and 2 (at the fin tip) with a uniform nodal spacing of $\Delta x$. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of this problem to determine \(T_{1}\) and \(T_{2}\) for the case of specified temperature at the fin base and negligible heat transfer at the fin tip. All temperatures are in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Determine the approximate temperatures at nodes 1 and 2 for a pin fin experiencing steady one-dimensional heat conduction with constant thermal conductivity and constant diameter, given the fin's base temperature, \(T_0\), and the ambient temperature, \(T_{\infty}\). Short Answer: First, discretize the fin into three nodes. Then, apply the energy balance approach to create equations for \(T_1\) and \(T_2\). Approximate \(T_2\) as close to \(T_{\infty}\) and solve for \(T_1\). Finally, use the calculated value of \(T_1\) to solve for \(T_2\). Remember that this is an approximation, and for more accurate values, perform iterations with the updated values of \(T_1\) and \(T_2\).

Step by step solution

01

Discretize the fin using the energy balance approach

Discretize the fin into three nodes (0 at the base, 1 in the middle, and 2 at the fin tip) with uniform spacing \(\Delta x\). The energy balance at each node would take the form: At node 1: \(-kA\frac{T_1-T_0}{\Delta x}+hP(\Delta x)(T_1-T_{\infty})-kA\frac{T_2-T_1}{\Delta x}=0\) At node 2: \(-kA\frac{T_2-T_1}{\Delta x}+hP(\Delta x)(T_2-T_{\infty})=0\) Here, \(k\) is the thermal conductivity, \(A\) is the cross-sectional area of the fin, \(P\) is the perimeter of the fin, and \(T_{\infty}\) is the ambient temperature.
02

Rearrange the equations for \(T_1\) and \(T_2\)

From the energy balance at node 1, we can rearrange the equation for \(T_1\): \(T_1=\frac{kA(T_0+T_2)}{\Delta x^2}+\frac{hP(\Delta x)(T_\infty)}{2kA/\Delta x+hP(\Delta x)}\) From the energy balance at node 2, we can rearrange the equation for \(T_2\): \(T_2=\frac{kA T_1}{\Delta x^2}+\frac{hP(\Delta x)(T_\infty)}{kA/\Delta x}\)
03

Solve for \(T_1\) using the specified temperature at the fin base and negligible heat transfer at the fin tip

We are given \(T_0\) and told to assume negligible heat transfer at the fin tip. Therefore, we can approximate \(T_2\) as close to \(T_{\infty}\). Substitute these values into the equation for \(T_1\) and solve for \(T_1\). It's important to note that this is an approximation, and \(T_2\) should be calculated using the full equation for better accuracy.
04

Solve for \(T_2\) using the calculated value of \(T_1\)

Now that we have an estimate for \(T_1\), we can substitute this value into the equation for \(T_2\). Solve for \(T_2\) to find the temperature at the fin tip. Remember that this is an approximation, and for an accurate value of \(T_2\), we should iterate with the updated value of \(T_1\). By following these steps, we can obtain the temperatures at nodes 1 and 2 for the pin fin using the energy balance approach and finite difference formulation. The results give us insight into the heat transfer behavior of the fin and can be used to better understand its performance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider one-dimensional transient heat conduction in a composite plane wall that consists of two layers \(A\) and \(B\) with perfect contact at the interface. The wall involves no heat generation and initially is at a specified temperature. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes 0,1 (at the interface), and 2 with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). Using the energy balance approach, obtain the explicit finite difference formulation of this problem for the case of insulation at the left boundary (node 0 ) and radiation at the right boundary (node 2 ) with an emissivity of \(\varepsilon\) and surrounding temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}\).

A nonmetal plate is connected to a stainless steel plate by long ASTM A437 B4B stainless steel bolts \(9.5 \mathrm{~mm}\) in diameter. The portion of the bolts exposed to convection heat transfer with a cryogenic fluid is \(5 \mathrm{~cm}\) long. The fluid temperature for convection is at \(-50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with a convection heat transfer coefficient of $100 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\(. The thermal conductivity of the bolts is known to be \)23.9 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}$. Both the nonmetal and stainless steel plates maintain a uniform temperature of \(0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). According to the ASME Code for Process Piping (ASME B31.3-2014, Table A-2M), the minimum temperature suitable for ASTM A437 B4B stainless steel bolts is \(-30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Using the finite difference method with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x=5 \mathrm{~mm}\) along the bolt, determine the temperature at each node. Compare the numerical results with the analytical solution. Plot the temperature distribution along the bolt. Would any part of the ASTM A437 B4B bolts be lower than the minimum suitable temperature of \(-30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) ?

What is a practical way of checking if the round-off error has been significant in calculations?

Consider a rectangular metal block $(k=35 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K})\( of dimensions \)100 \mathrm{~cm} \times 75 \mathrm{~cm}$ subjected to a sinusoidal temperature variation at its top surface while its bottom surface is insulated. The two sides of the metal block are exposed to a convective environment at \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and have a heat transfer coefficient of \(50 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). \(\mathrm{K}\). The sinusoidal temperature distribution at the top surface is given as $100 \sin (\pi x / L)\(. Using a uniform mesh size of \)\Delta x=\Delta y=25 \mathrm{~cm}$, determine \((a)\) finite difference equations and \((b)\) the nodal temperatures.

Design a defrosting plate to speed up defrosting of flat food items such as frozen steaks and packaged vegetables, and evaluate its performance using the finite difference method. Compare your design to the defrosting plates currently available on the market. The plate must perform well, and it must be suitable for purchase and use as a household utensil, durable, easy to clean, easy to manufacture, and affordable. The frozen food is expected to be at an initial temperature of \(-18^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) at the beginning of the thawing process and \(0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) at the end with all the ice melted. Specify the material, shape, size, and thickness of the proposed plate. Justify your recommendations by calculations. Take the ambient and surrounding surface temperatures to be \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and the convection heat transfer coefficient to be \(15 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) in your analysis. For a typical case, determine the defrosting time with and without the plate.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free