Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider steady one-dimensional heat conduction in a plane wall with variable heat generation and constant thermal conductivity. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes \(0,1,2\), and 3 with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). The temperature at the left boundary (node 0 ) is specified. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of boundary node 3 at the right boundary for the case of combined convection and radiation with an emissivity of \(\varepsilon\), convection coefficient of \(h\), ambient temperature of \(T_{\infty}\), and surrounding temperature of $T_{\text {sarr }}$. Also, obtain the finite difference formulation for the rate of heat transfer at the left boundary.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The finite difference formulation for node 3 is \(RT1 - 2RT3 + h(T_{\infty}-T3) + \varepsilon\sigma(T_{\text{sarr}}^4 - T3^4) = 0\), and the finite difference formulation for the rate of heat transfer at node 0 is \(q_0 = k\frac{T1 - T0}{\Delta x}\).

Step by step solution

01

Analyze heat conduction equation

The heat conduction equation for a plane wall with variable heat generation and constant thermal conductivity (\(k\)) is given by: \(\begin{equation} \frac{d^2T}{dx^2}=-\frac{q_g}{k} \end{equation}\) Where \(q_g\) is the heat generation per unit volume, \(T\) is the temperature, and \(x\) is the distance along the wall.
02

Apply energy balance for a node

For any boundary node \(i\) in the nodal network, the energy balance equation can be written as: \(\begin{equation} \frac{k}{\Delta x^2}(T_{i-1}-2T_i+T_{i+1}) = -q_g \end{equation}\)
03

Apply boundary conditions for node 3

At node 3, the plane wall is subjected to combined convection and radiation. Hence, the energy balance for node 3 is: \(\begin{equation} \frac{k}{\Delta x^2}(T1 - 2T3) + h(T_{\infty}-T3) + \varepsilon\sigma(T_{\text{sarr}}^4 - T3^4) = 0 \end{equation}\) Here, \(\sigma\) is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. To simplify this equation, we can set \(R = \frac{k}{\Delta x^2}\), and replace \(T2\) with \(T0 - 2\Delta x\) assuming that node 0 is fixed at \(T0\).
04

Derive finite difference formulation for node 3

Using the equation obtained in Step 3, we can rewrite the energy balance for node 3 as: \(\begin{equation} RT1 - 2RT3 + h(T_{\infty}-T3) + \varepsilon\sigma(T_{\text{sarr}}^4 - T3^4) = 0 \end{equation}\) This is the finite difference formulation for node 3.
05

Derive finite difference formulation for rate of heat transfer at node 0

For the left boundary node 0, as the temperature is specified, the rate of heat transfer can be obtained using the energy balance equation with \(q_{0} = k\frac{T_{1}-T_{0}}{\Delta x}\): \(\begin{equation} q_0 = k\frac{T1 - T0}{\Delta x} \end{equation}\) This is the finite difference formulation for the rate of heat transfer at the left boundary node 0.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a large plane wall of thickness \(L=0.4 \mathrm{~m}\), thermal conductivity \(k=2.3 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), and surface area \(A=20 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\). The left side of the wall is maintained at a constant temperature of \(95^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), while the right side loses heat by convection to the surrounding air at $T_{\infty}=15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\( with a heat transfer coefficient of \)h=18 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}$. Assuming steady one-dimensional heat transfer and taking the nodal spacing to be \(10 \mathrm{~cm}\), (a) obtain the finite difference formulation for all nodes, (b) determine the nodal temperatures by solving those equations, and (c) evaluate the rate of heat transfer through the wall.

Consider a refrigerator whose outer dimensions are $1.80 \mathrm{~m} \times 0.8 \mathrm{~m} \times 0.7 \mathrm{~m}$. The walls of the refrigerator are constructed of \(3-\mathrm{cm}\)-thick urethane insulation $(k=0.026 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\( and \)\alpha=0.36 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}$ ) sandwiched between two layers of sheet metal with negligible thickness. The refrigerated space is maintained at \(3^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and the average heat transfer coefficients at the inner and outer surfaces of the wall are \(6 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and $9 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}$, respectively. Heat transfer through the bottom surface of the refrigerator is negligible. The kitchen temperature remains constant at about \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Initially, the refrigerator contains \(15 \mathrm{~kg}\) of food items at an average specific heat of $3.6 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}$. Now a malfunction occurs, and the refrigerator stops running for \(6 \mathrm{~h}\) as a result. Assuming the temperature of the contents of the refrigerator, including the air inside, rises uniformly during this period, predict the temperature inside the refrigerator after \(6 \mathrm{~h}\) when the repairman arrives. Use the explicit finite difference method with a time step of $\Delta t=1 \mathrm{~min}\( and a mesh size of \)\Delta x=1 \mathrm{~cm}$, and disregard corner effects (i.e., assume one-dimensional heat transfer in the walls).

Consider steady heat conduction in a plane wall with variable heat generation and constant thermal conductivity. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes \(0,1,2,3\), and 4 with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of the boundary nodes for the case of uniform heat flux \(\dot{q}_{0}\) at the left boundary (node 0 ) and convection at the right boundary (node 4) with a convection coefficient of \(h\) and an ambient temperature of \(T_{\infty}\).

Consider transient heat conduction in a plane wall with variable heat generation and constant thermal conductivity. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes 0,1 , \(2,3,4\), and 5 with a uniform nodal spacing of $\Delta x$. The wall is initially at a specified temperature. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the explicit finite difference formulation of the boundary nodes for the case of insulation at the left boundary (node 0 ) and radiation at the right boundary (node 5) with an emissivity of \(\varepsilon\) and surrounding temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}\)

What are the two basic methods of solution of transient problems based on finite differencing? How do heat transfer terms in the energy balance formulation differ in the two methods?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free