Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suggest some practical ways of reducing the roundoff error.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: To reduce round-off errors, consider the following practical ways: 1. Understand the problem and identify the sources of round-off error. 2. Use higher precision in calculations. 3. Maintain a careful ordering of operations. 4. Employ error-compensating algorithms. 5. Avoid unstable functions and algorithms. 6. Keep track of error bounds in your calculations.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem and Identify the Sources of Round-off Error

Begin by understanding the specific calculations in the problem that can generate round-off errors. In general, the errors occur when dealing with floating-point numbers in computers due to their limitations in numerical representation. So, identify where these floating-point calculations are performed and pay attention to minimizing their errors.
02

Use of Higher Precision

One practical way of reducing round-off errors is using a higher precision for calculations. For example, using double precision instead of single precision allows for a larger number of significant digits in the representation of numbers, which leads to a reduction in the round-off error. Most programming languages and platforms provide built-in support for higher-precision arithmetic.
03

Use a Careful Ordering of Operations

Selecting an appropriate sequence for performing operations can help in minimizing round-off errors. When adding or subtracting numbers, tackle the numbers in ascending or descending order according to their magnitude to reduce errors. Moreover, perform operations that can lead to large round-off errors, like the subtraction of two nearly equal numbers, with caution.
04

Use Error-Compensating Algorithms

Use algorithms that are designed to compensate for round-off errors when available. For example, the Kahan summation algorithm is an alternative method for summing a sequence of floating-point numbers with less accumulated error than the naive approach. Furthermore, the use of interval arithmetic or exact arithmetic can also reduce round-off error in certain cases.
05

Avoid Unstable Functions and Algorithms

Some functions and algorithms are more prone to amplifying round-off errors than others. These are usually called "unstable" or "ill-conditioned." It's important to recognize which functions or algorithms in your problem might be such cases and try to replace them with more stable alternatives when applicable.
06

Keep Track of Error Bounds

While solving problems involving numerical calculations, it is essential to keep track of the expected error bounds in order to understand the behavior of the solution and error propagation through the calculations. This way, you can either adjust the solution approach or have an idea of how reliable the obtained results are for a given problem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Starting with an energy balance on the volume element, obtain the steady three-dimensional finite difference equation for a general interior node in rectangular coordinates for \(T(x, y, z)\) for the case of constant thermal conductivity and uniform heat generation.

In many engineering applications variation in thermal properties is significant, especially when there are large temperature gradients or the material is not homogeneous. To account for these variations in thermal properties, develop a finite difference formulation for an internal node in the case of a three-dimensional, steady-state heat conduction equation with variable thermal conductivity.

Consider transient two-dimensional heat conduction in a rectangular region that is to be solved by the explicit method. If all boundaries of the region are either insulated or at specified temperatures, express the stability criterion for this problem in its simplest form.

Consider transient heat conduction in a plane wall with variable heat generation and constant thermal conductivity. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes 0,1 , \(2,3,4\), and 5 with a uniform nodal spacing of $\Delta x$. The wall is initially at a specified temperature. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the explicit finite difference formulation of the boundary nodes for the case of insulation at the left boundary (node 0 ) and radiation at the right boundary (node 5) with an emissivity of \(\varepsilon\) and surrounding temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}\)

How is the finite difference formulation for the first derivative related to the Taylor series expansion of the solution function?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free