Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a large uranium plate of thickness \(L=9 \mathrm{~cm}\), thermal conductivity \(k=28 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), and thermal diffusivity \(\alpha=12.5 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}\) that is initially at a uniform temperature of \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Heat is generated uniformly in the plate at a constant rate of $\dot{e}=10^{6} \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\(. At time \)t=0$, the left side of the plate is insulated while the other side is subjected to convection with an environment at \(T_{\infty}=20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with a heat transfer coefficient of \(h=35 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). Using the explicit finite difference approach with a uniform nodal spacing of $\Delta x=1.5 \mathrm{~cm}\(, determine \)(a)$ the temperature distribution in the plate after \(5 \mathrm{~min}\) and \((b)\) how long it will take for steady conditions to be reached in the plate.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The criterion used to determine when steady-state conditions have been reached in the plate is when the maximum temperature change in the plate is less than a certain chosen threshold (typically 0.5% or 1% relative to the maximum temperature swing) for each time step.

Step by step solution

01

Mesh and Time Step Calculation

First, we need to calculate how many cells or nodes there are in the plate. Since the thickness L is 9 cm and the nodal spacing Δx is 1.5 cm, we will have 7 nodes. Next, the stability criteria for the explicit finite difference method is given by \(F=\frac{\alpha \Delta t}{(\Delta x)^{2}}\leq\frac{1}{2}\), where F is the Fourier Number, α is the thermal diffusivity, Δt is the time step, and Δx is the nodal spacing. Solving for Δt, we have $$ \Delta t \leq \frac{1}{2} \cdot (\Delta x)^{2} / \alpha = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (0.015 \, \text{m})^2 / 12.5 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{m}^2/\text{s} $$ Calculating the allowed time step Δt, we get a value of 9 seconds.
02

Explicit Finite Difference Approach

Now we apply the explicit finite difference approach for the 7 nodes. Use the formulas below that correspond to the initial and boundary conditions: For the initial condition (\(t=0\)), \(T(x) = 100 °C\) for all \(x\). For the left boundary condition (insulated), derivative vanishes, so \(T_1^{n+1}=T_2^{n+1}\) For the right boundary condition (convection), using the extra node method, \(T_{n+1}^{n+1}=T_{n-1}^{n+1} + 2\frac{h\Delta x}{k}\left(T_\infty - T_n^{n+1}\right)\) For the internal nodes, $$ T_i^{n+1} = T_i^n + F \left(T_{i+1}^n - 2T_i^n + T_{i-1}^n\right) + \frac{\Delta t \cdot \dot{e}}{k} $$
03

Temperature Distribution After 5 Minutes

Now, we apply the explicit finite difference approach for every node in the plate to find the temperature distribution after 5 minutes: 1. Start with the initial temperature distribution given by \(T(x) = 100 °C\). 2. Determine temperatures for each node at each time step using the explicit finite difference approach. 3. Repeat the process for 5 minutes or 300 seconds (300 s / 9 s per time step = 33 time steps). 4. After 33 time steps, we obtain the temperature distribution within the plate for each node.
04

Time to Reach Steady-State Conditions

Compute the maximum allowed time step, which is based on the threshold for when the temperature distribution changes less than a certain amount (typically 0.5% or 1% relative to the maximum temperature swing): 1. Apply the explicit finite difference approach until the maximum temperature change in the plate is less than the chosen threshold for each time step. 2. Note down the time taken for the temperature changes to decrease below the threshold. 3. The time taken to reach steady-state conditions is the time for the temperature changes to fall below the threshold. By following the above steps, we can determine the temperature distribution in the plate after 5 minutes, as well as the time it takes for steady-state conditions to be reached.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a medium in which the finite difference formulation of a general interior node is given in its simplest form as $$ T_{\text {node }}=\left(T_{\text {beft }}+T_{\text {top }}+T_{\text {right }}+T_{\text {bottom }}\right) / 4 $$ (a) Is heat transfer in this medium steady or transient? (b) Is heat transfer one-, two-, or three-dimensional? (c) Is there heat generation in the medium? (d) Is the nodal spacing constant or variable? (e) Is the thermal conductivity of the medium constant or variable?

How does the finite difference formulation of a transient heat conduction problem differ from that of a steady heat conduction problem? What does the term \(\rho A \Delta x c_{p}\left(T_{m}^{i+1}-T_{m}^{i}\right) / \Delta t\) represent in the transient finite difference formulation?

Consider steady one-dimensional heat conduction in a pin fin of constant diameter \(D\) with constant thermal conductivity. The fin is losing heat by convection to the ambient air at \(T_{\infty}\) with a convection coefficient of \(h\), and by radiation to the surrounding surfaces at an average temperature of \(T_{\text {surr- }}\). The nodal network of the fin consists of nodes 0 (at the base), 1 (in the middle), and 2 (at the fin tip) with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of this problem to determine \(T_{1}\) and \(T_{2}\) for the case of specified temperature at the fin base and negligible heat transfer at the fin tip. All temperatures are in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\).

A 1-m-long and \(0.1\)-m-thick steel plate of thermal conductivity $35 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}$ is well insulated on both sides, while the top surface is exposed to a uniform heat flux of $5500 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}$. The bottom surface is convectively cooled by a fluid at \(10^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) having a convective heat transfer coefficient of $150 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}$. Assuming one-dimensional heat conduction in the lateral direction, find the temperature at the midpoint of the plate. Discretize the plate thickness into four equal parts.

In the energy balance formulation of the finite difference method, it is recommended that all heat transfer at the boundaries of the volume element be assumed to be into the volume element even for steady heat conduction. Is this a valid recommendation even though it seems to violate the conservation of energy principle?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free