Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The implicit method is unconditionally stable and thus any value of time step \(\Delta t\) can be used in the solution of transient heat conduction problems. To minimize the computation time, someone suggests using a very large value of \(\Delta t\) since there is no danger of instability. Do you agree with this suggestion? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: While the implicit method is unconditionally stable, allowing for the use of larger time steps without causing instability, using a very large time step can lead to a loss of accuracy in the solution. It is important to balance time step size, stability, accuracy, and computation time to obtain the most efficient and accurate solution for a specific problem. Thus, using a very large time step may not always be the best approach.

Step by step solution

01

Stability of implicit method

The implicit method is unconditionally stable, which means it will produce a stable solution regardless of the time step size chosen. So, on the stability aspect, there is no limitation on the size of the time step we can use.
02

Accuracy of solutions

However, stability alone does not guarantee accurate solutions. The choice of a very large \(\Delta t\) may lead to a significant reduction in the accuracy of the results, as the solutions at each time step may deviate considerably from the actual behavior of the system.
03

Relation between time step size and computation time

In general, a larger time step size will result in fewer time steps needed to reach a certain point in time, thus potentially reducing computation time. However, if the time step is too large, the inaccuracies in the solution might require additional corrective actions or smaller time steps later, which could increase the overall computational effort.
04

Conclusion

While the unconditionally stable nature of the implicit method allows for the use of larger time steps without the danger of instability, using a very large value of \(\Delta t\) can lead to a loss of accuracy in the solution. It is important to balance the time step size, stability, accuracy, and computation time to obtain the most efficient and accurate solution for a specific problem. Therefore, simply using a very large time step is not always the best approach.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Express the general stability criterion for the explicit method of solution of transient heat conduction problems.

What is a practical way of checking if the discretization error has been significant in calculations?

Consider steady one-dimensional heat conduction in a plane wall with variable heat generation and constant thermal conductivity. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes \(0,1,2,3,4\), and 5 with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of the boundary nodes for the case of insulation at the left boundary (node 0 ) and radiation at the right boundary (node 5) with an emissivity of \(\varepsilon\) and surrounding temperature of \(T_{\text {carr }}\)

Consider steady two-dimensional heat transfer in a square cross section $(3 \mathrm{~cm} \times 3 \mathrm{~cm})$ with the prescribed temperatures at the top, right, bottom, and left surfaces to be $100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 200^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\(, and \)500^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$, respectively. Using a uniform mesh size \(\Delta x=\Delta y\), determine \((a)\) the finite difference equations and \((b)\) the nodal temperatures with the GaussSeidel iterative method.

A cylindrical aluminum fin with adiabatic tip is attached to a wall with surface temperature of \(300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and it is exposed to an ambient air condition of \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with convection heat transfer coefficient of \(150 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The fin has a uniform cross section with diameter of \(1 \mathrm{~cm}\), length of $5 \mathrm{~cm}\(, and thermal conductivity of \)237 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}$. Assuming steady one-dimensional heat transfer along the fin and the nodal spacing to be uniformly \(10 \mathrm{~mm},(a)\) obtain the finite difference equations for use with the Gauss-Seidel iterative method, and \((b)\) determine the nodal temperatures using the Gauss-Seidel iterative method, and compare the results with the analytical solution.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free