Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider transient two-dimensional heat conduction in a rectangular region that is to be solved by the explicit method. If all boundaries of the region are either insulated or at specified temperatures, express the stability criterion for this problem in its simplest form.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The stability criterion for this problem is given by the inequality: $$\Delta t \le \frac{1}{2\alpha \left(\frac{1}{(\Delta x)^2} + \frac{1}{(\Delta y)^2} \right)}$$ where $$\Delta t$$ is the time step size, $$\Delta x$$ and $$\Delta y$$ are the spatial step sizes in the x and y directions, respectively, and $$\alpha$$ is the material's thermal diffusivity.

Step by step solution

01

Write down the two-dimensional heat conduction equation

The transient two-dimensional heat conduction equation, without heat generation, is given by: $$\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} = \alpha \left( \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial y^2} \right)$$ Where \(T\) is the temperature, \(t\) is the time, \(x, y\) are the spatial coordinates, and \(\alpha\) is the material's thermal diffusivity.
02

Discretize the equation using finite difference method

Using the forward difference for time and central difference for spatial coordinates, we can discretize the heat conduction equation as follows: $$ \frac{T^{p+1}_{i,j} - T^{p}_{i,j}}{\Delta t} = \alpha \left( \frac{T^{p}_{i+1,j} - 2\cdot T^{p}_{i,j} + T^{p}_{i-1,j}}{(\Delta x)^2} + \frac{T^{p}_{i,j+1} - 2\cdot T^{p}_{i,j} + T^{p}_{i,j-1}}{(\Delta y)^2} \right)$$ Where \(T^{p}_{i,j}\) is the temperature at point \((i,j)\) at time level \(p\), \(\Delta t\) is the time step size, \(\Delta x\) and \(\Delta y\) are the spatial step sizes in the \(x\) and \(y\) directions, respectively.
03

Obtain the explicit equation for the next temperature step

We can solve the above equation for \(T^{p+1}_{i,j}\), which gives the explicit formula for the next temperature step: $$T^{p+1}_{i,j} = T^{p}_{i,j} + \alpha \Delta t \left( \frac{T^{p}_{i+1,j} - 2\cdot T^{p}_{i,j} + T^{p}_{i-1,j}}{(\Delta x)^2} + \frac{T^{p}_{i,j+1} - 2\cdot T^{p}_{i,j} + T^{p}_{i,j-1}}{(\Delta y)^2} \right)$$
04

Derive the stability criterion for the explicit method

For stability, we must satisfy the Von Neumann stability criterion which, in this context, states that: $$ \alpha \Delta t \left(\frac{1}{(\Delta x)^2} + \frac{1}{(\Delta y)^2}\right) \le \frac{1}{2}$$ So the stability criterion for the transient two-dimensional heat conduction problem, considering the explicit method and assuming a rectangular region with insulated or specified temperature boundaries, can be expressed in its simplest form as: $$\Delta t \le \frac{1}{2\alpha \left(\frac{1}{(\Delta x)^2} + \frac{1}{(\Delta y)^2} \right)}$$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider steady one-dimensional heat conduction in a pin fin of constant diameter \(D\) with constant thermal conductivity. The fin is losing heat by convection to the ambient air at \(T_{\infty}\) with a heat transfer coefficient of \(h\). The nodal network of the fin consists of nodes 0 (at the base), 1 (in the middle), and 2 (at the fin tip) with a uniform nodal spacing of $\Delta x$. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of this problem to determine \(T_{1}\) and \(T_{2}\) for the case of specified temperature at the fin base and negligible heat transfer at the fin tip. All temperatures are in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\).

How is an insulated boundary handled in the finite difference formulation of a problem? How does a symmetry line differ from an insulated boundary in the finite difference formulation?

Consider a medium in which the finite difference formulation of a general interior node is given in its simplest form as $$ \frac{T_{m-1}-2 T_{m}+T_{m+1}}{\Delta x^{2}}+\frac{\dot{e}_{m}}{k}=0 $$ (a) Is heat transfer in this medium steady or transient? (b) Is heat transfer one-, two-, or three-dimensional? (c) Is there heat generation in the medium? (d) Is the nodal spacing constant or variable? (e) Is the thermal conductivity of the medium constant or variable?

Consider steady one-dimensional heat conduction in a plane wall with variable heat generation and variable thermal conductivity. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes 0,1 , and 2 with a uniform nodal spacing of $\Delta x$. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of this problem for the case of specified heat flux \(\dot{q}_{0}\) to the wall and convection at the left boundary (node 0 ) with a convection coefficient of \(h\) and ambient temperature of \(T_{\infty^{+}}\) and radiation at the right boundary (node 2 ) with an emissivity of \(\varepsilon\) and surrounding surface temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}\)

Can the global (accumulated) discretization error be less than the local error during a step? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free