Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Moisture migration in the walls, floors, and ceilings of buildings is controlled by vapor barriers or vapor retarders. Explain the difference between the two, and discuss which is more suitable for use in the walls of residential buildings.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The main difference between vapor barriers and vapor retarders is their level of resistance to water vapor movement. Vapor barriers are highly resistant, making them effective at preventing moisture migration, while vapor retarders offer a moderate level of resistance, providing better moisture management and adaptability. The choice between the two for use in residential walls depends on factors such as climate, building materials, and construction methods. Vapor barriers may be better in colder climates, while vapor retarders may be more suitable in mixed climates.

Step by step solution

01

Define vapor barriers and vapor retarders

First, we need to define the two terms. A vapor barrier is a material that is highly resistant to the movement of water vapor through it, such as plastic sheeting or foil. It typically has a very low permeance, or water vapor transmission rate (less than 0.1 perm), making it effective at preventing moisture migration. In contrast, a vapor retarder is a material that is moderately resistant to water vapor movement, with a permeance of 0.1 to 1.0 perm. Vapor retarders can include materials like coated paper, asphalt-impregnated building papers, or certain types of paint.
02

Discuss the advantages of vapor barriers

Vapor barriers have the advantage of being highly effective at preventing moisture migration, which can help protect building materials from damage and prevent the growth of mold and mildew. By completely blocking the passage of water vapor, a vapor barrier can ensure that moisture levels within the building envelope remain constant, reducing the risk of condensation and associated damage.
03

Discuss the advantages of vapor retarders

Vapor retarders offer a more moderate level of moisture control, allowing some degree of vapor transmission while still slowing down the rate of moisture migration. This can allow for better moisture management within the building envelope, as the materials are still able to “breathe” to some extent. This can be especially important in areas with fluctuating outdoor humidity levels or with materials that need to release moisture gradually.
04

Discuss the suitability of vapor barriers and vapor retarders for residential walls

Both vapor barriers and vapor retarders can be suitable for use in the walls of a residential building, depending on various factors such as climate, building materials, and construction methods. Vapor barriers may be more suitable in colder climates, where preventing indoor moisture from reaching cold surfaces and causing condensation is crucial. Vapor retarders may be more appropriate in mixed climates, where seasonal temperature and humidity fluctuations require a more adaptable approach to moisture control. Ultimately, it is important to consider the specific needs of the building, taking into account factors like climate, local building codes, and material compatibility, when selecting the appropriate vapor control method.
05

Conclusion

In conclusion, while both vapor barriers and vapor retarders serve the purpose of controlling moisture migration within buildings, their level of resistance to water vapor movement differs. Vapor barriers are highly resistant and offer a more effective moisture control solution, while vapor retarders provide a moderate level of resistance, allowing for better moisture management and adaptability. Choosing which method is more suitable for use in the walls of a residential building depends on factors such as climate, building materials, and construction methods.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the difference between mass-average velocity and mole-average velocity during mass transfer in a moving medium? If one of these velocities is zero, will the other also necessarily be zero? Under what conditions will these two velocities be the same for a binary mixture?

Benzene-free air at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(101.3 \mathrm{kPa}\) enters a \(5-\mathrm{cm}\)-diameter tube at an average velocity of $5 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$. The inner surface of the 6-m-long tube is coated with a thin film of pure benzene at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The vapor pressure of benzene \(\left(\mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{6}\right)\) at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) is $13 \mathrm{kPa}$, and the solubility of air in benzene is assumed to be negligible. Calculate \((a)\) the average mass transfer coefficient in \(\mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}\), (b) the molar concentration of benzene in the outlet air, and \((c)\) the evaporation rate of benzene in $\mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{h}$.

What is the physical significance of the Lewis number? How is it defined? What does a Lewis number of 1 indicate?

The average heat transfer coefficient for airflow over an odd-shaped body is to be determined by mass transfer measurements and using the Chilton-Colburn analogy between heat and mass transfer. The experiment is conducted by blowing dry air at \(1 \mathrm{~atm}\) at a free-stream velocity of $2 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$ over a body covered with a layer of naphthalene. The surface area of the body is \(0.75 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\), and it is observed that $100 \mathrm{~g}\( of naphthalene has sublimated in \)45 \mathrm{~min}$. During the experiment, both the body and the air were kept at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), at which the vapor pressure and mass diffusivity of naphthalene are $11 \mathrm{~Pa}\( and \)D_{A B}=0.61 \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}$, respectively. Determine the heat transfer coefficient under the same flow conditions over the same geometry.

The local convection heat transfer coefficient for air flowing parallel over a 1 -m-long plate with irregular surface topology is experimentally determined to be \(h_{x}=0.5+12 x-0.7 x^{3}\), where \(h_{x}\) is in $\mathrm{W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}$. If the plate surface is coated with water, determine the corresponding average mass convection coefficient over the entire plate. Assume properties can be evaluated at \(298 \mathrm{~K}\) and $1 \mathrm{~atm}$.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free