Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Jakob (1949) suggests the following correlation be used for square tubes in a liquid cross-flow situation: $$ \mathrm{Nu}=0.102 \mathrm{Re}^{0.625} \operatorname{Pr}^{1 / 3} $$ Water \((k=0.61 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, \operatorname{Pr}=6)\) flows across a \(1-\mathrm{cm}\) square tube with a Reynolds number of 10,000 . The convection heat transfer coefficient is (a) \(5.7 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (b) \(8.3 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (c) \(11.2 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (d) \(15.6 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (e) \(18.1 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The convection heat transfer coefficient is approximately 6.52 kW/m²·K, which is closest to option (a) 5.7 kW/m²·K.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the given correlation formula

The given correlation formula is $$ \mathrm{Nu}=0.102 \mathrm{Re}^{0.625} \operatorname{Pr}^{1 / 3} $$ where Nu is the Nusselt number, Re is the Reynolds number and Pr is the Prandtl number. Our goal is to find the convection heat transfer coefficient "h" which can be calculated using the Nusselt number as follows: $$ \mathrm{Nu}=\frac{h L}{k} $$ where L is the characteristic length of the square tube and k is the thermal conductivity.
02

Substitute the given values

We are given the values for Re, Pr and k. We can now substitute them in the correlation equation. $$ \mathrm{Nu}=0.102 (10,000)^{0.625} (6)^{1 / 3} $$
03

Calculate the Nusselt number

We can now calculate the Nusselt number. $$ \mathrm{Nu} \approx 105.31 $$
04

Calculate the convection heat transfer coefficient "h"

Now, we can use the Nusselt number to find the convection heat transfer coefficient "h" using the equation: $$ \mathrm{Nu}=\frac{h L}{k} $$ Rearranging to solve for "h": $$ h = \frac{\mathrm{Nu} \times k}{L} $$ Substitute the values for Nu, k and L (1 cm = 0.01 m) into the equation: $$ h = \frac{105.31 \times 0.61 \,\mathrm{W}/\mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}}{0.01 \,\mathrm{m}} $$
05

Find the final value and match with the given options

Calculate the final value of the convection heat transfer coefficient "h": $$ h \approx 6516.3 \,\mathrm{W}/\mathrm{m}^2 \cdot \mathrm{K} $$ Converting to kW: $$ h \approx 6.52 \,\mathrm{kW}/\mathrm{m}^2 \cdot \mathrm{K} $$ This is closest to option (a) \(5.7 \,\mathrm{kW}/\mathrm{m}^2 \cdot \mathrm{K}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Nusselt Number
The Nusselt number, often represented as "Nu," is a dimensionless number that plays a crucial role in the study of convection heat transfer. It gives us an idea of how efficient heat transfer is from a surface into a fluid that is flowing past it. In essence, the Nusselt number is a ratio:
  • The numerator represents convective heat transfer, which happens due to the motion of the fluid.
  • The denominator signifies conductive heat transfer, which takes place through the fluid's own material properties.

The formula for the Nusselt number in this particular exercise is equation: \[\mathrm{Nu} = \frac{hL}{k} \]Where:
  • \(h\) is the convection heat transfer coefficient.
  • \(L\) is the characteristic length, specifically the side of the square tube in this context.
  • \(k\) stands for the fluid's thermal conductivity.

In our problem, the Nusselt number is calculated using the correlation: \[\mathrm{Nu} = 0.102 \mathrm{Re}^{0.625} \operatorname{Pr}^{1/3} \]To get a value for the Nusselt number, you use specific fluid flow characteristics like the Reynolds and Prandtl numbers.
Reynolds Number
The Reynolds number, often abbreviated as "Re," is a dimensionless quantity that helps us distinguish between different kinds of flow patterns in fluid dynamics. It reflects whether the flow will be laminar or turbulent:
  • Laminar flow: Smooth and orderly, usually characterized by lower Reynolds numbers.
  • Turbulent flow: Chaotic and mixed, often observed at higher Reynolds numbers.

The Reynolds number tells us how significant inertia forces are compared to viscous forces in the fluid. It's expressed by the formula:\[\mathrm{Re} = \frac{\rho v L}{\mu} \]Where:
  • \(\rho\) is the fluid density.
  • \(v\) is the fluid velocity.
  • \(L\) stands for the characteristic length, for our exercise, it's the side of the square tube.
  • \(\mu\) is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid.

In the provided scenario, a Reynolds number of 10,000 indicates turbulent flow across the square tube. This high Reynolds number showcases increased convective heat transfer due to the mixing action of turbulent flows.
Prandtl Number
The Prandtl number, symbolized as "Pr," is essential in the analysis of heat transfer in fluids. It gives us a way to relate the fluid's viscosity to its thermal conductivity. This number is also dimensionless and is calculated as follows:\[\operatorname{Pr} = \frac{\mu c_p}{k}\]Where:
  • \(\mu\) is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid.
  • \(c_p\) is the specific heat at constant pressure.
  • \(k\) represents the thermal conductivity.

What's fascinating about the Prandtl number is that it helps decide the relative thickness of the velocity boundary layer versus the thermal boundary layer in a fluid. A higher Prandtl number implies that the thermal layer is thinner compared to the momentum layer.
In this problem, the Prandtl number given for water is 6, suggesting dominantly a thicker momentum layer. The Nusselt number equation uses this to calculate efficient heat transfer during convection processes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Air at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) flows over a 5 -cm-diameter, 1.7-m-long smooth pipe with a velocity of \(4 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\). A refrigerant at \(-15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) flows inside the pipe and the surface temperature of the pipe is essentially the same as the refrigerant temperature inside. The drag force exerted on the pipe by the air is (a) \(0.4 \mathrm{~N}\) (b) \(1.1 \mathrm{~N}\) (c) \(8.5 \mathrm{~N}\) (d) \(13 \mathrm{~N}\) (e) \(18 \mathrm{~N}\) (For air, use \(\nu=1.382 \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}, \rho=1.269 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\) )

Define frontal area of a body subjected to external flow. When is it appropriate to use the frontal area in drag and lift calculations?

Consider a refrigeration truck traveling at \(55 \mathrm{mph}\) at a location where the air temperature is \(80^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). The refrigerated compartment of the truck can be considered to be a 9-ft-wide, 8-ft-high, and 20 -ft-long rectangular box. The refrigeration system of the truck can provide 3 tons of refrigeration (i.e., it can remove heat at a rate of \(600 \mathrm{Btu} / \mathrm{min}\) ). The outer surface of the truck is coated with a low-emissivity material, and thus radiation heat transfer is very small. Determine the average temperature of the outer surface of the refrigeration compartment of the truck if the refrigeration system is observed to be operating at half the capacity. Assume the air flow over the entire outer surface to be turbulent and the heat transfer coefficient at the front and rear surfaces to be equal to that on side surfaces. For air properties evaluations assume a film temperature of \(80^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). Is this a good assumption?

What is the effect of streamlining on \((a)\) friction drag and \((b)\) pressure drag? Does the total drag acting on a body necessarily decrease as a result of streamlining? Explain.

What is the difference between streamlined and blunt bodies? Is a tennis ball a streamlined or blunt body?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free