Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What happens to the discretization and the round-off errors as the step size is decreased?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Decreasing step sizes generally reduce discretization errors by providing a more accurate representation of the continuous function. However, while the round-off errors initially decrease, they may eventually increase if the step size is too small, as the increased number of calculations can accumulate errors. The optimal step size strikes a balance between minimizing discretization errors and avoiding excessive round-off errors.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Discretization and Round-off Errors

Discretization error refers to the error that results from approximating a continuous function with a discrete one, usually in numerical methods. This error arises from the fact that we are taking a finite number of steps to approximate a function over a certain interval. Round-off error, on the other hand, is the difference between the exact value and its representation in the system. This error arises from calculating with finite precision, causing the least significant digits to be lost.
02

Understand the Role of Step Size

Step size is the distance between each discrete point in the approximation of a continuous function. Smaller step sizes lead to more points within a given interval, which can potentially lead to a better approximation of the function.
03

Analyze the Effect of Decreasing Step Size on Discretization Error

As the step size decreases, the number of discrete points increases. This leads to a better approximation of the continuous function, as the discrete points are closer together, creating a more accurate representation. Consequently, the discretization error will decrease as the step size decreases.
04

Analyze the Effect of Decreasing Step Size on Round-off Error

Decreasing the step size initially reduces round-off errors since the solution obtained is more accurate. However, when the step size is decreased beyond the optimal level, the round-off errors can accumulate because of the increased number of calculations the system must perform to reach the solution. As these errors accumulate, the overall round-off error may increase.
05

Conclusion

As the step size decreases, the discretization error usually decreases because the approximation of the continuous function becomes more accurate. However, the round-off error, while initially decreasing, may increase if the step size is too small due to the accumulation of errors in the increased number of calculations. The optimal step size should be a balance between minimizing discretization error and avoiding excessive round-off errors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Discretization Error
When using numerical methods to approximate continuous functions, discretization error plays a crucial role. This error arises because these methods approximate the continuous domain by dividing it into discrete intervals or steps.
The smaller these intervals, the closer we can get to the actual curve of the function.

However, discretization involves approximating a curve with a series of straight lines or equivalent methods, where each straight line represents a 'step'.
As a result, there exists a gap between the actual continuous curve and the piecewise representation created through this process.
Discretization error quantifies this gap, essentially measuring how closely the discrete approximation matches the actual function.

The impact of changing the step size affects discretization error significantly.
  • A smaller step size leads to a more significant number of steps or intervals, which means your approximation will follow the curve more closely, reducing the discretization error.
  • The trade-off typically involves computational cost and time, as a smaller step size requires more calculations.
Yet, it's crucial to recognize that decreasing the step size doesn’t always lead to a noticeable improvement in all situations, as other factors such as round-off errors eventually come into play.
Round-off Error
Round-off error emerges from the limitations of representing numbers in computers, as they have finite precision.
Computers store numbers in a finite number of bits, so exact values are rounded to the nearest representable number.

These approximations cause small differences between true mathematical values and their computerized representations.
As computations become more complex or numerous, round-off errors can accumulate, potentially affecting the accuracy of the final results.

An essential consideration in numerical methods is how step size interacts with round-off error.
  • Initially, a smaller step size can reduce round-off error since the solution becomes more precise.
  • However, extremely tiny step sizes may increase the number of calculations, thus introducing more opportunities for rounding errors to occur and accumulate.
Finding a balance in step size is vital, as it affects both discretization and round-off errors.
If consideration for round-off error is neglected, overly reducing step size could inadvertently worsen the issue by amplifying accumulation errors in calculations.
Step Size
Step size is a pivotal parameter in numerical analysis, dictating the distance or difference between consecutive points where the function is being approximated.
Consider it as the width of each 'step' in a staircase model of the function versus a smooth ramp that represents the actual function.

A smaller step size intuitively offers a closer match to the curve of the actual function, as it results in more frequent sampling of the function within the interval.
This increased sampling accounts for decreased discretization error, enhancing the fidelity of the approximation by allowing the 'staircase' to more closely mirror the 'ramp'.

Nevertheless, finding the optimal step size is a form of art in numerical methods practice. While smaller is better to a certain extent, beyond a point:
  • Computational load increases, as more steps require more calculations.
  • Cumulative round-off error becomes significant if not managed carefully.
Therefore, it is essential to identify a step size that minimizes discretization error while keeping round-off error under control, reflecting a core decision in successful numerical methods applications.
Numerical Methods
Numerical methods are computational algorithms used to find approximate solutions to mathematical problems that may be challenging, time-consuming, or impossible to solve analytically.
These methods are indispensable for handling complex problems in science, engineering, and economics.

Typical numerical methods solve equations, integrate functions, or simulate physical phenomena by relying on discretizing continuous problems.
Methods such as Euler's method, Runge-Kutta methods, and finite differences illustrate how numerical methods convert continuous problems into manageable, discrete steps.

The choice of numerical methods shapes the precision and efficiency of problem-solving, but these methods inherently bring discretization and round-off errors into play.
Thus, leveraging numerical methods successfully requires an understanding of how errors accumulate:
  • Discretization error happens due to the method of approximation used in breaking down the problem.
  • Round-off error occurs with machine precision limits in implementing these algorithms.
Selecting the appropriate numerical method involves considering the balance between computational cost, acceptable error levels, and the required precision of the solution.
Understanding these trade-offs allows effective use of numerical methods for accurate and efficient solutions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A DC motor delivers mechanical power to a rotating stainless steel shaft ( \(k=15.1 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K})\) with a length of \(25 \mathrm{~cm}\) and a diameter of \(25 \mathrm{~mm}\). The DC motor is in a surrounding with ambient air temperature of \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and convection heat transfer coefficient of \(25 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), and the base temperature of the motor shaft is \(90^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Using a uniform nodal spacing of \(5 \mathrm{~cm}\) along the motor shaft, determine the finite difference equations and the nodal temperatures by solving those equations.

What is a practical way of checking if the round-off error has been significant in calculations?

Starting with an energy balance on a volume element, obtain the steady two- dimensional finite difference equation for a general interior node in rectangular coordinates for \(T(x, y)\) for the case of variable thermal conductivity and uniform heat generation.

Is there any limitation on the size of the time step \(\Delta t\) in the solution of transient heat conduction problems using (a) the explicit method and \((b)\) the implicit method?

Consider transient one-dimensional heat conduction in a pin fin of constant diameter \(D\) with constant thermal conductivity. The fin is losing heat by convection to the ambient air at \(T_{\infty}\) with a heat transfer coefficient of \(h\) and by radiation to the surrounding surfaces at an average temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}\). The nodal network of the fin consists of nodes 0 (at the base), 1 (in the middle), and 2 (at the fin tip) with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). Using the energy balance approach, obtain the explicit finite difference formulation of this problem for the case of a specified temperature at the fin base and negligible heat transfer at the fin tip.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free