Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Can the global (accumulated) discretization error be less than the local error during a step? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Although theoretically possible in rare cases where local errors significantly cancel each other out, the global discretization error is typically larger than the local error during a specific step in numerical integration methods. This is because the global error accumulates local errors across all steps in the process.

Step by step solution

01

Define Local and Global Discretization Errors

Local discretization error is the error that occurs during a single step of numerical integration, which arises because the numerical method is using an approximate solution instead of the true solution. The local error is a measure of the difference between the true solution and the approximate solution for a particular step. Global discretization error, on the other hand, is the accumulated error over all steps in the numerical integration process. It gives an overall idea of how accurate the numerical solution is compared to the true solution over the entire interval.
02

Relationship Between Local and Global Discretization Errors

In numerical integration methods, the global error is an accumulation of local errors that occur during each step of the process. Since the local error is the error for a single step and the global error is the sum of these local errors for all steps, the global error is generally larger than a single local error. However, it may be possible that some of the local errors will cancel each other out (e.g., positive and negative errors) when estimating the global error. The method's error analysis would determine the exact impact of the local errors on the global error. In such cases, it is theoretically possible for the global error to be smaller than the local error for a particular step of the process. However, this situation is relatively unlikely.
03

Conclusion

In summary, while it is theoretically possible for the global (accumulated) discretization error to be smaller than the local error during a specific step, this situation is relatively rare. The global error is typically larger than the local error, as it accumulates the local errors across all steps in the numerical integration process. To have a smaller global error in such cases, local errors would need to cancel each other out in a significant manner, which is not frequently observed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Numerical Integration
Numerical integration is a method used to calculate the integral of a function when it is difficult or impossible to find an analytical solution. This technique involves approximating the solution by summing up small segments or slices. Imagine you are trying to find the area under a curve. Instead of drawing a perfect line and calculating the area below it, numerical integration allows you to break down the curve into easy-to-manage shapes, like rectangles or trapezoids.
To perform numerical integration, you choose points along the interval of integration, apply weights to these points, and then sum them up to find an approximate value of the integral.
  • Common methods include the Trapezoidal Rule, Simpson's Rule, and more sophisticated Gaussian quadrature.
  • The accuracy of numerical integration depends on the method used and how the function behaves.
  • Numerical integration is useful in engineering, physics, and any field where complex mathematical models are used.
"Numerical integration" provides an invaluable tool for tackling otherwise impossible mathematical problems.
Local Error
Local error in numerical integration refers to the error that occurs during a single step of the integration process. At each step, rather than using the exact mathematical solution, an approximation is used, leading to a slight difference between the "true" answer and the given approximation.
Imagine walking to a destination and taking a wrong turn at one intersection—this is similar to a local error; it happens at a specific point.
  • The size of a local error depends on the method used and the step size.
  • Smaller step sizes typically result in smaller local errors.
  • Local errors can accumulate to impact the global error significantly.
Understanding and minimizing local errors is crucial for ensuring the overall accuracy of numerical solutions.
Global Error
Global error accumulates all the individual local errors over the entire interval of integration. It provides a comprehensive measure of the integration method's overall accuracy.
Using our earlier analogy, global error is like the total distance you are off course after several wrong turns—the sum of each deviation.
  • Global error tends to be larger than any single local error because it aggregates all errors made at every step.
  • The magnitude of the global error can depend on the number of steps taken, thus it often increases with more steps.
  • Some local errors might cancel out though, potentially reducing the global error.
Managing global error is essential as it can quickly grow and lead to inaccurate results if not properly controlled.
Error Analysis
Error analysis is the examination of errors in numerical computations to improve accuracy and reliability of the results. In numerical integration, error analysis involves understanding both local and global discretization errors.
This analysis helps in understanding how errors propagate through computations.
  • Error analysis seeks to minimize errors or understand their impact on final results.
  • It provides insights into choosing the right step size and method for numerical integration.
  • Understanding error behavior can inform choices to balance computational efficiency and accuracy.
Through careful error analysis, one can prevent minor errors from aggregating into major inaccuracies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider steady one-dimensional heat conduction in a plane wall with variable heat generation and constant thermal conductivity. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes \(0,1,2\), and 3 with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). The temperature at the left boundary (node 0 ) is specified. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of boundary node 3 at the right boundary for the case of combined convection and radiation with an emissivity of \(\varepsilon\), convection coefficient of \(h\), ambient temperature of \(T_{\circ}\), and surrounding temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}\). Also, obtain the finite difference formulation for the rate of heat transfer at the left boundary.

How can a node on an insulated boundary be treated as an interior node in the finite difference formulation of a plane wall? Explain.

Define these terms used in the finite difference formulation: node, nodal network, volume element, nodal spacing, and difference equation.

Why do the results obtained using a numerical method differ from the exact results obtained analytically? What are the causes of this difference?

Consider a 2-m-long and 0.7-m-wide stainless-steel plate whose thickness is \(0.1 \mathrm{~m}\). The left surface of the plate is exposed to a uniform heat flux of \(2000 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) while the right surface of the plate is exposed to a convective environment at \(0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with \(h=400 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The thermal conductivity of the stainless steel plate can be assumed to vary linearly with temperature range as \(k(T)=k_{o}(1+\beta T)\) where \(k_{o}=48 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and \(\beta=9.21 \times 10^{-4}{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}^{-1}\). The stainless steel plate experiences a uniform volumetric heat generation at a rate of \(8 \times 10^{5} \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\). Assuming steady state one-dimensional heat transfer, determine the temperature distribution along the plate thickness.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free