Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a heat exchanger that has an NTU of 4 . Someone proposes to double the size of the heat exchanger and thus double the NTU to 8 in order to increase the effectiveness of the heat exchanger and thus save energy. Would you support this proposal?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: To determine whether to support the proposal, calculate and compare the effectiveness of the heat exchanger at NTU values of 4 and 8. If the increase in effectiveness justifies the extra cost and practical considerations of doubling the heat exchanger size, then the proposal can be supported.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the effectiveness for NTU = 4

First, we will calculate the effectiveness of the heat exchanger at the initial NTU value of 4. We will use the effectiveness formula, which is: Effectiveness \((ε_1)\) = \( (1- e^{-NTU_1(1-C_r)})/(1-C_r e^{-NTU_1(1-C_r)}) \) Plug the NTU_1 value (4) into the equation to find ε_1.
02

Calculate the effectiveness for NTU = 8

Next, we will calculate the effectiveness of the proposed heat exchanger at NTU_2 of 8. We will use the same effectiveness formula: Effectiveness \((ε_2)\) = \( (1- e^{-NTU_2(1-C_r)})/(1-C_r e^{-NTU_2(1-C_r)}) \) Plug the NTU2 value (8) into the equation to find ε2.
03

Compare the two effectiveness values

Now, we will compare the values of ε1 and ε2. If ε2 is significantly greater than ε1, the increase in effectiveness might lead to energy savings, and we can support the proposal. However, if there is only a marginal difference, the proposal might not bring significant energy savings.
04

Evaluate the proposal

Based on the comparison in Step 3, if the increase in effectiveness justifies the extra cost of doubling the size of the heat exchanger, we can support the proposal. Otherwise, we should not support the proposal. (Note: This solution assumes that doubling the size of the heat exchanger will indeed double the NTU value in practice. And it should be noted that this simplification does not factor in potential energy-saving differences for various heat exchanger types, i.e., countercurrent flow, parallel flow, or heat exchanger efficiency values. There are also additional practical considerations, such as available installation space and maintenance requirements, that should be taken into account when deciding on a proposal.)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

NTU (Number of Transfer Units)
The NTU, or Number of Transfer Units, is a measure of the effectiveness of a heat exchanger. It represents how well the heat exchanger can transfer heat between two fluids. The NTU is calculated based on the size of the heat exchanger and the heat capacity rates of the two fluids involved. A higher NTU indicates a more effective heat exchanger.

When evaluating a heat exchanger's efficiency, the NTU is a vital parameter. It helps determine the approach temperature difference required for heat transfer. Using this value, engineers can assess whether a heat exchanger is meeting the desired thermal performance.
  • Higher NTU generally leads to higher effectiveness.
  • The NTU is crucial in designing and optimizing heat exchangers.
  • It serves as a guide to evaluate potential enhancements.
The NTU captures the relation between physical dimensions and performance, offering insights into how modifications might impact utility and energy conservation. Understanding NTU helps in making informed decisions for design upgrades or replacements.
Energy Savings
In thermal engineering, energy savings are a core aim, particularly when dealing with heat exchanger systems. They function to improve energy efficiency and reduce operational costs by maximizing heat recovery.

Energy-saving strategies involve evaluating the existing heat exchanger setup and considering possible improvements like increasing the NTU. Although, as indicated in the exercise solution, doubling the NTU might not significantly improve energy savings due to diminishing returns with increased exchanger size.
  • Energy efficiency is achieved by maximizing heat recovery in the system.
  • Significant energy savings occur when effectiveness gains greatly outweigh the costs of upgrades.
  • It's essential to evaluate the economics and practicality before deciding major modifications.
Achieving energy savings without incurring excessive costs and operational disruptions requires a balanced approach. Such evaluations ensure that efforts align with the overall energy management goals of the system.
Thermal Engineering
Thermal engineering is the broad field that deals with the study of heat transfer and the design of systems that manage this process effectively. When it comes to heat exchangers, thermal engineering principles are critical for optimizing their performance.

Heat exchangers in thermal systems are paramount for efficient energy conversion processes, like in power plants, HVAC systems, and manufacturing processes.
  • Thermal engineering integrates various scientific principles, including fluid dynamics and thermodynamics.
  • It aims to enhance heat transfer while minimizing energy loss.
  • Use of analysis and simulations allows engineers to predict performance outcomes.
In practice, thermal engineering helps ensure that systems achieve desired heat transfer rates and operate within safe temperature ranges to maintain system integrity. Well-designed thermal systems save energy and reduce costs in long-term operations, highlighting its importance in both design and operation phases.
Heat Exchanger Design
The design of a heat exchanger is an intricate process involving numerous factors like material selection, configuration, flow arrangement, and the NTU/capacity rates.

Effective heat exchanger design directly affects the performance and efficiency of thermal systems. Considering the proposed exercise solution, doubling the size might increase the NTU but does not linearly translate to doubled energy efficiency. This indicates the importance of a holistic design approach.
  • Design must consider fluid properties and flow types (counterflow, parallel flow).
  • Materials used should withstand thermal stresses and compatibility with fluids.
  • Maintainability and operational space availability can influence design choices.
These considerations ensure that a heat exchanger not only meets the current needs but can also adapt to future demands. A careful design helps prevent underperformance and unforeseen maintenance issues, thus ensuring long-term value from the investment.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A test is conducted to determine the overall heat transfer coefficient in a shell-and-tube oil-to-water heat exchanger that has 24 tubes of internal diameter \(1.2 \mathrm{~cm}\) and length \(2 \mathrm{~m}\) in a single shell. Cold water \(\left(c_{p}=4180 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right)\) enters the tubes at \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) at a rate of \(3 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) and leaves at \(55^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Oil \(\left(c_{p}=2150 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right)\) flows through the shell and is cooled from \(120^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to \(45^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Determine the overall heat transfer coefficient \(U_{i}\) of this heat exchanger based on the inner surface area of the tubes.

Consider two double-pipe counter-flow heat exchangers that are identical except that one is twice as long as the other one. Which heat exchanger is more likely to have a higher effectiveness?

By taking the limit as \(\Delta T_{2} \rightarrow \Delta T_{1}\), show that when \(\Delta T_{1}=\Delta T_{2}\) for a heat exchanger, the \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{lm}}\) relation reduces to \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{lm}}=\Delta T_{1}=\Delta T_{2} .\)

Saturated water vapor at \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) condenses in the shell side of a 1 -shell and 2-tube heat exchanger with a surface area of \(0.5 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\) and an overall heat transfer coefficient of \(2000 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). Cold water \(\left(c_{p c}=4179 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right)\) flowing at \(0.5 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) enters the tube side at \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), determine the outlet temperature of the cold water and the heat transfer rate for the heat exchanger.

A cross-flow heat exchanger with both fluids unmixed has an overall heat transfer coefficient of \(200 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), and a heat transfer surface area of \(400 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\). The hot fluid has a heat capacity of \(40,000 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{K}\), while the cold fluid has a heat capacity of \(80,000 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{K}\). If the inlet temperatures of both hot and cold fluids are \(80^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), respectively, determine the exit temperature of the cold fluid.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free