Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Discuss the differences between the cardiovascular counter-current design and standard engineering countercurrent designs.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The main differences between cardiovascular counter-current design and standard engineering countercurrent designs are their mechanisms, efficiency, and examples. Cardiovascular design is a biological heat exchange process occurring in the circulatory system of some organisms, focusing on temperature management. Standard engineering countercurrent designs are industrial processes designed for maximum efficiency in heat or mass transfer and often involve fluids separated by a membrane or other medium. Cardiovascular counter-current design can be found in animals, while engineering countercurrent designs are used in industries such as chemical, petroleum, and power generation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Cardiovascular Counter-Current Design

Cardiovascular counter-current design is a biological heat exchange mechanism that occurs in the circulatory system of some animals. In this design, blood flows through vessels adjacent to one another, but in opposite directions. This helps maintain a stable body temperature by promoting the exchange of heat between warm arterial blood and cool venous blood.
02

Understanding Standard Engineering Counter-Current Design

Standard engineering counter-current design refers to an industrial process where two streams or fluids flow in opposite directions to enhance heat or mass transfer. In these designs, the two streams come into contact, allowing exchange to occur more efficiently.
03

Differences in Mechanism

In the cardiovascular counter-current design, heat exchange occurs naturally in the body through the close proximity and opposite flow of blood in adjacent blood vessels. No external contact is needed for the exchange to occur, and the primary focus is the management of temperature. In standard engineering countercurrent designs, the fluids involved are often separated by a membrane or other medium. The primary focus in these designs is the transfer of heat or materials between different fluids and processes for efficiency and energy saving purposes.
04

Differences in Efficiency

Although cardiovascular counter-current design can be very efficient in living organisms, factors such as metabolic rate, size of the organism, and environment can influence the efficiency of the exchange process. On the other hand, standard engineering counter-current designs are designed for maximum efficiency based on the specific application and parameters of the systems involved.
05

Differences in Examples

Cardiovascular counter-current design can be found in various animals, such as birds, marine mammals, and some reptiles. These organisms rely on this heat exchange mechanism to adapt to their environment by maintaining a stable body temperature. Standard engineering counter-current design examples include heat exchangers, distillation columns, and absorption towers used in industries such as chemical, petroleum, and power generation. In conclusion, the differences between the cardiovascular counter-current design and standard engineering countercurrent designs lie in their mechanism, efficiency, and examples. While the cardiovascular design is a biological heat exchange process occurring in the circulatory system of some organisms, engineering counter-current designs are industrial processes designed for maximum efficiency in heat or mass transfer.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cardiovascular Counter-Current Design
In the fascinating world of animal biology, there is a mechanism known as the cardiovascular counter-current design, which serves as a natural temperature regulator. This ingenious system utilizes the flow of blood within an organism's body to maintain optimal body temperatures, critical for survival. Imagine arterial blood, warmed by the body's core, flowing down a limb and positioned right next to a vein carrying cooler blood back from the extremities. As these blood vessels run alongside each other, they do so in opposite directions, creating a counter-current flow. This design allows heat to transfer from the warmer arterial blood to the cooler venous blood, conserving heat within the body and minimizing heat loss.

This biological heat exchange system is especially crucial for animals living in extreme temperatures. For instance, penguins in the Antarctic rely on this mechanism to keep their feet from freezing, while maintaining core body heat. The efficiency of this system is subject to various factors, including the organism's metabolic rate and the environmental conditions. While this cardiovascular counter-current heat exchange is naturally optimized for the species' survival, it is not necessarily the most efficient method when compared to engineered systems designed for industry.
Standard Engineering Countercurrent Design
In contrast to the natural systems found in living organisms, the standard engineering countercurrent design is a cornerstone in industrial processes. This design principle is applied to efficiently transfer heat or mass between two fluids moving in opposite directions. Unlike the seamless exchange within the bodies of animals, these systems often rely on conduits or membranes to separate and manage the flow of fluids. Think of it as a way to strategically direct the flow of a hot fluid and a cold fluid in such a manner that they exchange heat without mixing.

Industries harnessing this method, like chemical or power generation sectors, design their heat exchangers, distillation columns, and absorption towers with the goal of achieving maximum transfer efficiency. For instance, in a heat exchanger, a hot liquid flows on one side of a metallic wall while a cooler liquid runs on the opposite side. Heat is transferred through the wall from the hot to the cool liquid, which may be essential for regulating temperatures in a power plant. Applied wisdom from engineering enables the fine-tuning of these designs for optimal performance under a variety of applications.
Heat Exchangers
Diving deeper into the realm of industrial applications, heat exchangers embody the principle of counter-current design to facilitate the transfer of heat between two or more fluids. The role of heat exchangers is pivotal in conserving energy, improving process efficiency, and managing temperatures in various systems. Heat exchangers come in several types, each suited to particular conditions and demands, such as shell-and-tube, plate, and finned-tube designs.

The choice of a heat exchanger depends on factors like the types of fluids involved, the required temperature change, and the flow rates. For example, the shell-and-tube heat exchanger is renowned for its robustness, making it suitable for high-pressure applications. Heat exchangers are not only found in industrial settings but are also present in everyday life, from refrigeration systems to vehicle radiators. They truly are technological marvels that enable energy saving and efficiency in numerous processes.
Efficiency in Heat Transfer
The concept of efficiency in heat transfer is central to both biological systems and industrial designs. In the context of counter-current heat exchangers, efficiency refers to how well the system can transfer heat from the hot fluid to the cold fluid without wasting energy. A high-efficiency counter-current heat exchanger can dramatically reduce the energy required to cool or heat fluids, leading to cost savings and reduced environmental impact.

Factors influencing the efficiency of heat transfer include the surface area of contact between fluids, the temperature gradient, the properties of the fluids involved, and the flow rates. Emphasizing efficiency in the design phase can result in systems that operate effectively under specific conditions, supporting energy conservation and sustainability. For instance, improving the thermal conductivity of materials used in heat exchangers can enhance overall efficiency. Hence, whether in natural systems or man-made devices, optimizing heat transfer efficiency is a common goal that drives innovation and adaptation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An air-cooled condenser is used to condense isobutane in a binary geothermal power plant. The isobutane is condensed at \(85^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) by air \(\left(c_{p}=1.0 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right)\) that enters at \(22^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) at a rate of \(18 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\). The overall heat transfer coefficient and the surface area for this heat exchanger are \(2.4 \mathrm{~kW} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and \(1.25 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\), respectively. The outlet temperature of air is (a) \(45.4^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (b) \(40.9^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (c) \(37.5^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (d) \(34.2^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (e) \(31.7^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\)

Consider a recuperative cross flow heat exchanger (both fluids unmixed) used in a gas turbine system that carries the exhaust gases at a flow rate of \(7.5 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) and a temperature of \(500^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The air initially at \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and flowing at a rate of \(15 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) is to be heated in the recuperator. The convective heat transfer coefficients on the exhaust gas and air side are \(750 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and \(300 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), respectively. Due to long term use of the gas turbine the recuperative heat exchanger is subject to fouling on both gas and air side that offers a resistance of \(0.0004 \mathrm{~m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K} / \mathrm{W}\) each. Take the properties of exhaust gas to be the same as that of air \(\left(c_{p}=1069 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right)\). If the exit temperature of the exhaust gas is \(320^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) determine \((a)\) if the air could be heated to a temperature of \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{C}(b)\) the area of heat exchanger \((c)\) if the answer to part (a) is no, then determine what should be the air mass flow rate in order to attain the desired exit temperature of \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \((d)\) plot variation of the exit air temperature over a temperature range of \(75^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to \(300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with air mass flow rate assuming all the other conditions remain the same.

Consider a heat exchanger that has an NTU of 4 . Someone proposes to double the size of the heat exchanger and thus double the NTU to 8 in order to increase the effectiveness of the heat exchanger and thus save energy. Would you support this proposal?

A shell-and-tube heat exchanger is to be designed to cool down the petroleum- based organic vapor available at a flow rate of \(5 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) and at a saturation temperature of \(75^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The cold water \(\left(c_{p}=4187 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right)\) used for its condensation is supplied at a rate of \(25 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) and a temperature of \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The cold water flows through copper tubes with an outside diameter of \(20 \mathrm{~mm}\), a thickness of \(2 \mathrm{~mm}\), and a length of \(5 \mathrm{~m}\). The overall heat transfer coefficient is assumed to be \(550 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and the latent heat of vaporization of the organic vapor may be taken to be \(580 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\). Assuming negligible thermal resistance due to pipe wall thickness, determine the number of tubes required.

Ethanol is vaporized at \(78^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\left(h_{f g}=846 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\right)\) in a double-pipe parallel-flow heat exchanger at a rate of \(0.03 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) by hot oil \(\left(c_{p}=2200 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right)\) that enters at \(120^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). If the heat transfer surface area and the overall heat transfer coefficients are \(6.2 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\) and \(320 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), respectively, determine the outlet temperature and the mass flow rate of oil using \((a)\) the LMTD method and \((b)\) the \(\varepsilon-\mathrm{NTU}\) method.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free