Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider film condensation on the outer surfaces of four long tubes. For which orientation of the tubes will the condensation heat transfer coefficient be the highest: (a) vertical, (b) horizontal side by side, (c) horizontal but in a vertical tier (directly on top of each other), or \((d)\) a horizontal stack of two tubes high and two tubes wide?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The orientation with the highest condensation heat transfer coefficient is the vertical orientation (a).

Step by step solution

01

Vertical Orientation (a)

In this case, the condensate flows downward along the surface of the tubes due to gravity. This flow minimizes the thickness of the condensate film, resulting in a higher heat transfer coefficient. The effect of the adjacent tubes is negligible in this orientation.
02

Horizontal Side by Side (b)

For horizontal tubes arranged side by side, the condensate will accumulate on the bottom surfaces of the tubes. This results in a thicker film compared to the vertical orientation, which leads to a lower heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, the presence of neighboring tubes affects the thickness of the film.
03

Horizontal in a vertical tier (c)

In this case, the tubes are horizontal but placed vertically on top of each other. Condensate accumulates on the bottom surface of the top tube and on both the top and bottom surfaces of the bottom tube. This leads to a thicker film on the bottom tube, reducing the heat transfer coefficient.
04

Horizontal stack of two tubes high and two tubes wide (d)

For a.stack of tubes with two tubes high and two tubes wide, there is a combination of side-by-side and vertical tier effects. Each tube will be affected by the neighboring tubes, resulting in thicker films and even lower heat transfer coefficients.
05

Comparison and Conclusion

Among the given orientations, the vertical orientation (a) has the highest heat transfer coefficient due to the thinner condensate film and negligible effect of neighboring tubes. The other orientations, (b), (c), and (d), have lower heat transfer coefficients because of increased film thickness and the influence of adjacent tubes. Therefore, the orientation with the highest condensation heat transfer coefficient is the vertical orientation (a).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Film Condensation
Film condensation is a phenomenon where vapor contacts a colder surface and condenses into a liquid, forming a film on the surface. This process is integral to various industrial applications such as refrigeration, power generation, and air conditioning systems. The efficiency of heat transfer during film condensation is primarily influenced by the thickness of the condensate film. Thinner films offer less thermal resistance and therefore provide a higher heat transfer coefficient, which means the surface is more effective in transferring heat. Factors such as surface orientation, gravity, and vapor conditions impact the condensate film's development, resulting in varying efficiencies across different scenarios.

Understanding film thickness and its relationship with heat transfer is essential for designing efficient cooling systems. Engineers strive to optimize conditions to minimize film thickness and thereby maximize heat transfer rates. This balance is at the core of heat exchanger design and impacts the overall performance of condensation systems.
Heat Transfer in Tube Orientation
The orientation of tubes in a heat exchange system can significantly affect condensation heat transfer efficiency. In vertical orientation, gravity aids in the removal of the condensate, leading to a thinner film and thus a higher heat transfer coefficient. This configuration is considered ideal for maximizing heat removal per unit area. In contrast, horizontal tube arrangements prompt condensate pooling, resulting in greater film thickness and thus a reduced heat transfer coefficient.

When considering multiple tubes, the presence of adjacent tubes further complicates the dynamics of condensate film thickness. For example, tubes placed horizontally side by side can obstruct the flow of condensate, leading to higher film thickness and decreased heat transfer efficiency. Similarly, a stack of tubes not only encounters this issue but also experiences different film behaviors across various tube surfaces due to the complex impact of gravity and the presence of adjacent tubes.
Gravity Effect on Condensate Flow
Gravity plays a significant role in influencing the condensate flow and the subsequent heat transfer rate during film condensation. The gravitational force assists in drawing the liquid film down the surface of vertically oriented tubes, which effectively thins out the layer of condensate. This reduction in film thickness translates into higher heat conduction rates, as there is less material to resist the heat flow.

In horizontal orientations, however, gravity's effect is less beneficial. It causes the condensate to accumulate on the lower side of the tubes, thereby increasing the thickness and resistance to heat transfer. Understanding these gravity-induced behaviors allows engineers to manipulate tube orientation along with other system parameters to improve heat transfer performance in condensation systems.
Comparison of Condensate Film Thickness
Comparing condensate film thickness across different orientations provides insight into the most efficient configurations for heat transfer systems. The vertical orientation is generally preferred because it minimizes film thickness and optimizes the heat transfer process. When tubes are placed horizontally, whether side by side or in stacks, the film becomes thicker due to gravity's uneven impact on the condensate distribution. This leads to less efficient heat transfer.

More specifically, tubes in a horizontal arrangement side by side will experience a thicker film along the bottom, while tubes in a vertical tier or in a horizontal stack will have variable film thicknesses depending on their position. Upper tubes may have thinner films, while lower tubes in these configurations suffer from thicker films, especially in stacked arrangements where tubes can obstruct each other’s condensate flow. The exercise demonstrates that among the considered orientations, a vertical setup of tubes will present the thinnest condensate film and therefore the most effective heat transfer coefficient.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Steam condenses at \(50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) on the outer surface of a horizontal tube with an outer diameter of \(6 \mathrm{~cm}\). The outer surface of the tube is maintained at \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The condensation heat transfer coefficient is (a) \(5493 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (b) \(5921 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (c) \(6796 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (d) \(7040 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (e) \(7350 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) (For water, use \(\rho_{l}=992.1 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}, \mu_{l}=0.653 \times 10^{-3} \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{s}\), \(\left.k_{l}=0.631 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, c_{p l}=4179 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, h_{f g} \oplus T_{\text {satl }}=2383 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\right)\) 10-130 Steam condenses at \(50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) on the tube bank consisting of 20 tubes arranged in a rectangular array of 4 tubes high and 5 tubes wide. Each tube has a diameter of \(6 \mathrm{~cm}\) and a length of \(3 \mathrm{~m}\), and the outer surfaces of the tubes are maintained at \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The rate of condensation of steam is (a) \(0.054 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) (b) \(0.076 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) (c) \(0.315 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) (d) \(0.284 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) (e) \(0.446 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) (For water, use \(\rho_{l}=992.1 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}, \mu_{l}=0.653 \times 10^{-3} \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{s}\), \(\left.k_{l}=0.631 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, c_{p l}=4179 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, h_{f g \otimes T_{\text {sat }}}=2383 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\right)\)

Steam condenses at \(50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) on the tube bank consisting of 20 tubes arranged in a rectangular array of 4 tubes high and 5 tubes wide. Each tube has a diameter of \(6 \mathrm{~cm}\) and a length of \(3 \mathrm{~m}\), and the outer surfaces of the tubes are maintained at \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The rate of condensation of steam is (a) \(0.054 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) (b) \(0.076 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) (c) \(0.315 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) (d) \(0.284 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) (e) \(0.446 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) (For water, use \(\rho_{l}=992.1 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}, \mu_{l}=0.653 \times 10^{-3} \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{s}\), \(\left.k_{l}=0.631 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, c_{p l}=4179 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, h_{f g \otimes T_{\text {sat }}}=2383 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\right)\)

What is the difference between film and dropwise condensation? Which is a more effective mechanism of heat transfer?

A long cylindrical stainless steel rod \(\left(c_{p}=\right.\) \(450 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}, \rho=7900 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}, \varepsilon=0.30\) ) with mechanically polished surface is being conveyed through a water bath to be quenched. The \(25-\mathrm{mm}\)-diameter stainless steel rod has a temperature of \(700^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) as it enters the water bath. \(\mathrm{A}\) length of \(3 \mathrm{~m}\) of the rod is submerged in water as it is conveyed through the water bath during the quenching process. As the stainless steel rod enters the water bath, boiling would occur at \(1 \mathrm{~atm}\). In order to prevent thermal burn on people handling the rod, it must exit the water bath at a temperature below \(45^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Determine the speed of the rod being conveyed through the water bath so that it leaves the water bath without the risk of thermal burn hazard.

Saturated ammonia vapor at a pressure of \(1003 \mathrm{kPa}\) is condensed as it flows through a \(25-\mathrm{mm}\) tube. The tube length is \(0.5 \mathrm{~m}\) and the wall temperature is maintained uniform at \(5^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). If the vapor exits the tube at a flow rate of \(0.002 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\), determine the flow rate of the vapor at the inlet. Assume the Reynolds number of the vapor at the tube inlet is less than 35,000 . Is this a good assumption?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free