Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What is the difference between film and dropwise condensation? Which is a more effective mechanism of heat transfer?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Short Answer: Dropwise condensation is a more effective mechanism of heat transfer than film condensation because it does not have a continuous film insulating the surface, resulting in higher heat transfer rates and better heat transfer efficiency.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Film Condensation

Film condensation is when a vapor comes into contact with a cold surface and condenses into a continuous film. This layer of condensed liquid acts as an insulating barrier and hinders the heat transfer process. In other words, as the film thickness increases, the thermal resistance of the film increases as well, leading to a decrease in the rate of heat transfer.
02

Understanding Dropwise Condensation

Dropwise condensation, on the other hand, is characterized by the formation of discrete droplets on the cold surface instead of a continuous film. These droplets eventually grow in size, coalesce, and are removed from the surface by gravity or other forces. Since there is no continuous film of liquid acting as an insulator, heat transfer rates are generally higher in dropwise condensation as compared to film condensation.
03

Comparing Heat Transfer Rates

As discussed, dropwise condensation allows for better heat transfer rates due to the absence of an insulating film. This difference can be quantified using the Nusselt number (Nu), which is a dimensionless number used to describe the efficiency of heat transfer in a convective process. In general, dropwise condensation has a higher Nusselt number than film condensation, meaning it has a better heat transfer efficiency.
04

Conclusion

In conclusion, the main difference between film and dropwise condensation lies in the formation of a continuous film in the former, which reduces heat transfer efficiency. Dropwise condensation does not have this continuous film, resulting in higher heat transfer rates. Therefore, dropwise condensation is a more effective mechanism of heat transfer compared to film condensation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Film Condensation
Film condensation happens when vapor hits a cool surface, forming a solid sheet of liquid. This liquid layer can insulate the surface, making it harder for heat to pass through. The thicker the film gets, the more it blocks heat, reducing the heat transfer rate. Understanding this concept is crucial, especially when designing systems that rely on efficient heat exchange and cooling. It's important to note that the thermal resistance increases as the film grows, which is why this method is not the top choice for maximizing heat transfer. Film condensation is usually less efficient for heat transfer applications, as the continuous sheet it forms acts as a barrier.
Dropwise Condensation
In dropwise condensation, droplets form on a surface instead of a film. This occurs when vapor condenses and collects in small, separate drops. The droplets grow, merge together and eventually roll off due to gravity or other forces. This method of condensation is generally more effective for heat transfer because there's no insulating film. Without a continuous barrier, heat can travel faster from the surface to the surrounding environment. The surface exposure in dropwise condensation enhances the movement of thermal energy, making it an optimal choice for systems where efficient cooling is critical. Engineers often aim to maintain dropwise condensation due to its superior heat transfer qualities.
Heat Transfer Efficiency
When talking about condensation, heat transfer efficiency is a key factor to consider. Dropwise condensation provides a higher efficiency compared to film condensation. This is because, with dropwise condensation, the absence of an insulating layer allows for greater heat transfer rates. By measuring efficiency with the Nusselt number, which expresses the ratio of convective to conductive heat transfer, we can see that dropwise condensation typically yields a higher score. Systems that need high efficiency in heat exchange, like industrial coolers and steam generators, benefit significantly from adopting techniques that promote dropwise condensation. The higher efficiency means better performance, lower energy costs, and increased effectiveness in thermal management.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a non-boiling gas-liquid two-phase flow in a 102-mm diameter tube, where the superficial gas velocity is one-third that of the liquid. If the densities of the gas and liquid are \(\rho_{g}=8.5 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\) and \(\rho_{l}=855 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\), respectively, determine the flow quality and the mass flow rates of the gas and the liquid when the gas superficial velocity is \(0.8 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\).

A 2-mm-diameter cylindrical metal rod with emissivity of \(0.5\) is submerged horizontally in water under atmospheric pressure. When electric current is passed through the metal rod, the surface temperature reaches \(500^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Determine the power dissipation per unit length of the metal rod.

A 1 -mm diameter-long electrical wire submerged in water at atmospheric pressure is dissipating \(4100 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}\) of heat, and the surface temperature reaches \(128^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). If the experimental constant that depends on the fluid is \(n=1\), determine the nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficient and the value of the experimental constant \(C_{s f}\)

Saturated steam at \(55^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) is to be condensed at a rate of \(10 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{h}\) on the outside of a \(3-\mathrm{cm}\)-outer-diameter vertical tube whose surface is maintained at \(45^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) by the cooling water. Determine the required tube length. Assume wavylaminar flow, and that the tube diameter is large, relative to the thickness of the liquid film at the bottom of the tube. Are these good assumptions?

Saturated water vapor at atmospheric pressure condenses on the outer surface of a \(0.1\)-m-diameter vertical pipe. The pipe is \(1 \mathrm{~m}\) long and has a uniform surface temperature of \(80^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Determine the rate of condensation and the heat transfer rate by condensation. Discuss whether the pipe can be treated as a vertical plate. Assume wavy-laminar flow and that the tube diameter is large relative to the thickness of the liquid film at the bottom of the tube. Are these good assumptions?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free