Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: A car has fourwheels. When the car is moving, what fraction of its total kinetic energy is due to rotation of the wheels about their axles? Assume that the wheels have the same rotational inertia as uniform disks of the same mass and size. Why do you not need to know the radius of the wheels?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

  1. Fraction of total kinetic energy due to rotation
  2. We do not require the radius of the wheels because when we simplify the equation of fraction of kinetic energy, the radius of the wheel gets cancelled out.

Step by step solution

01

Given

massofcar=1000kgmassofWheel=10kg

02

To understand the concept

Using the formula for Kinetic energy of rotation and total kinetic energy, we can write the equations for kinetic energy of the car and wheels and find the fraction. Simplifying these equations would give us the reason why we do not need the radius for these calculations.

The kinetic energy of rotation is-

K.E.rotation=122

The kinetic energy of translation is-

K.E.=12mv2

Here, l is the moment of inertia, w is the angular velocity, v is the linear velocity and m is the mass.

03

Calculate the fraction of its total kinetic energy is due to rotation of the wheels about their axles

Rotational kinetic energy of the wheel can be written as

K.E.rotation=12Iω2

We have 4 wheels, so

K.E.rotation=4×12Iω2

Wheels can be assumed to be a disc, moment of inertia can be written as

I=12mR2K.E.rotation=2×12mR2ω2

We know thatv=Rω. Car and wheels would have same linear velocity. So we have

K.E.rotation=mv2

Total Kinetic energy of the car is given as

K.E.tot=12Mv2

The fraction of the total energy is-

f=K.E.rotationK.E.tot=mv212Mv2f=m0.5M

Substituting the values of masses, we have

f=10kg0.5×1000kg=0.02

04

Explain why you do not need to know the radius of the wheels

As seen from the above calculations, final equation for rotational kinetic energy would not have the term radius. This is because the motion is assumed to be a perfect rolling motion where there is no skidding or slipping. This would give us the linear velocity of the points on the wheel same as linear velocity of the car.

Hence, we do not need the radius of the wheels to calculate the fraction.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a long jump, an athlete leaves the ground with an initial angular momentum that tends to rotate her body forward, threatening to ruin her landing. To counter this tendency, she rotates her outstretched arms to “take up” the angular momentum (In figure). In 0.700s, one arm sweeps throughrole="math" localid="1660995016580" 0.500revand the other arms weeps through1.000rev. Treat each arm as a thin rod of mass4.0kgand length0.6mrotating around one end. In the athlete’s reference frame, what is the magnitude of the total angular momentum of the arms around the common rotation axis through the shoulders?

Windmill motion of the arms during a long jump helps maintain body orientation for a proper landing.

In unit-vector notation, what is the torque about the origin on a particle located at coordinates (0, -4.0m, 3.0m) if that torque is due to

(a) Force F1 with components F1x = 2.0 N, F1y = F1z = 0,

(b) Force F2with components F2x = 0,F2x = 2.0N,F2x = 4.0N?

A 3.0 kgtoy car moves along an xaxis with a velocity given by v=-2.0t3i^m/s, with t in seconds. For t>0, what are (a) the angular momentum Lof the car and (b) the torque τon the car, both calculated about the origin? What are (c) Land (d) τabout the point (2.0m,5.0m,0)? What are (e)Land (f)τabout the point(2.0m,-5.0m,0)?

Question: In Figure, three particles of mass m = 23 gm are fastened to three rods of length d = 12 cmand negligible mass. The rigid assembly rotates around point Oat the angular speed v = 0.85 rad/s. About O, (a) What are the rotational inertia of the assembly? (b) What are the magnitude of the angular momentum of the middle particle? (c) What are the magnitude of the angular momentum of the assembly?

At the instant of Figure, a 2.0kg particle Phas a position vector r of magnitude 3.0mand angle θ1=45o and a velocity vectorv of magnitude 4.0m/sand angleθ2=300. ForceF, of magnitude 2.0Nand angleθ3=30oacts on P. All three vectors lie in the xy plane. About the origin, (a) What is the magnitude of the angular momentum of P? (b) What is the direction of the angular momentum of P? (c) What is the magnitude of the torque acting on P? (d)What is the direction of the torque acting on P?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free