Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If you wanted to use the idealized trap of Fig. 39-1 to trap a positron, would you need to change

(a) the geometry of the trap,

(b) the electric potential of the central cylinder, or

(c) the electric potentials of the two semi-infinite end cylinders?

(A positron has the same mass as an electron but is positively charged.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The geometry of the trap need not be changed to trap a positron.

(b) The potential of the central cylinder need not be changed to trap a positron.

(c) The potential of the two semi-infinite end cylinders need to changed to +to trap the positron.

Step by step solution

01

Given data:

A positron is required to be trapped in a three-cylinder setup out of which the central cylinder is of finite length and is at the center and the other two are semi-infinitely long and are on both sides of the center cylinder.

02

Potential energy:

The potential energy U of a particle of charge q in a region of potential V is

U=qV ..... (I)

In the electron trap, the central cylinder is kept at zero potential and the semi-infinitely long cylinders are kept at infinitely negative potential.

03

(a) Determining whether the geometry of the trap needs to be changed to trap a positron:

The geometry of the trap doesn't take any useful part in the trap except for the fact that the left and right cylinders have to be infinitely long so that almost everywhere outside the central cylinder, the potential is constant. This has to be the case for the positron too. Hence the geometry need not be changed.

04

(b) Determining whether the potential of the central cylinder needs to be changed to trap a positron:

In the electron trap, the central cylinder is kept at zero potential so that from equation (I), the electron has zero potential energy inside it. The charge of the positron is positive but in a zero potential region, its potential energy will also be zero. Hence the potential of the central cylinder need not be changed.

05

(c) Determining whether the potential of the semi-infinite cylinders needs to be changed to trap a positron:

If the semi-infinite end cylinders are kept at potential -, the potential energy of the positron, from equation (I) will also be -outside the central cylinder. So if it moves to the sides, an infinite force will pull it out. The potential of the side cylinders can be made +.

As the positron is of the same mass of the electron, there is no need to change the geometry of the trap. Also, the central potential is at zero, so there is no need to change the central potential.

But as the positron has a positive charge, if you want to trap it, the potentials of the two walls of the well must be positive. That is the electric potentials of the two semi-infinite end cylinders must be changed.

Hence, the setup will act as an infinite potential well and the positron will be forced to stay inside the central cylinder.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Is the ground-state energy of a proton trapped in a one-dimensional infinite potential well greater than, less than, or equal to that of an electron trapped in the same potential well?

An electron is in the ground state in a two-dimensional, square, infinite potential well with edge lengths L. We will probe for it in a square of area 400pm2that is centered at x=L/8andy=L/8. The probability of detection turns out to be 4.5×10-8. What is edge length L?

The wave function for the hydrogen-atom quantum state represented by the dot plot shown in Fig. 39-21, which has n = 2 and l=ml=0, is

Ψ200(r)=142πa-3/2(2-ra)e-r/2a

in which a is the Bohr radius and the subscript onΨ(r)gives the values of the quantum numbers n,l,ml. (a) PlotΨ(2002r)and show that your plot is consistent with the dot plot of Fig. 39-21. (b) Show analytically thatΨ(2002r)has a maximum at r=4a. (c) Find the radial probability densityP200(r)for this state. (d) Show that

0P200(r)dr=1

and thus that the expression above for the wave function Ψ200(r)has been properly normalized.

For the hydrogen atom in its ground state, calculate (a) the probability density ψ2(r)and (b) the radial probability density P(r) for r = a, where a is the Bohr radius.

A muon of charge -eand massm=207me(wheremeis the mass of an electron) orbits the nucleus of a singly ionized helium atom (He+). Assuming that the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom can be applied to this muon–helium system, verify that the energy levels of the system are given by

E=-11.3eVn2

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free