Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) Use Maxwell's first equation, \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}=\rho_{v}\), to describe the variation of the electric field intensity with \(x\) in a region in which no charge density exists and in which a nonhomogeneous dielectric has a permittivity that increases exponentially with \(x\). The field has an \(x\) component only; \((b)\) repeat part \((a)\), but with a radially directed electric field (spherical coordinates), in which again \(\rho_{v}=0\), but in which the permittivity decreases exponentially with \(r\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The expression for the variation of radially directed electric field intensity with radial distance (r) in a region with a nonhomogeneous dielectric is given by \(E_r(r) = \frac{C_2}{\epsilon(r) r^2}\), where \(C_2\) is a constant.

Step by step solution

01

Write Maxwell's first equation in terms of given variables

In this problem, we are given the equation \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}=\rho_{v}\). Since no charge density exists, we have \(\rho_{v}=0\) and the equation becomes \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = 0\).
02

Express \(\mathbf{D}\) in terms of electric field intensity \(E_x\) and permittivity

For a nonhomogeneous dielectric with increasing permittivity, we have \(\mathbf{D} = \epsilon \mathbf{E}\). Since the electric field only has an \(x\) component, we can write: \(\mathbf{D} = \epsilon(x) E_x(x) \hat{x}\)
03

Calculate divergence of \(\mathbf{D}\)

Now, we need to find the divergence of \(\mathbf{D}\): \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = \frac{\partial (\epsilon(x) E_x(x))}{\partial x}\)
04

Set the divergence to zero and solve for \(E_x\)

Using the derived divergence from step 3 and the fact that \(\rho_v=0\), we now have: \(\frac{\partial (\epsilon(x) E_x(x))}{\partial x} = 0\) Integrating both sides with respect to \(x\) yields: \(\epsilon(x) E_x(x) = C_1\) We finally get the expression for the variation of electric field intensity with \(x\): \(E_x(x) = \frac{C_1}{\epsilon(x)}\) (b)
05

Repeat steps 1 and 2 for spherical coordinates

Using Maxwell's first equation in spherical coordinates, the divergence of \(\mathbf{D}\) for a radially varying electric field is given by: \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = \frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial (\epsilon(r) E_r(r) r^2)}{\partial r}\) Since \(\rho_{v} = 0\), the equation becomes: \(\frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial (\epsilon(r) E_r(r) r^2)}{\partial r} = 0\)
06

Solve the equation for \(E_r\)

Now, we need to solve this equation for \(E_r(r)\): \(\frac{\partial (\epsilon(r) E_r(r) r^2)}{\partial r} = 0\) Integrating both sides with respect to \(r\) yields: \(\epsilon(r) E_r(r) r^2 = C_2\) Finally, we get the expression for the variation of radially directed electric field intensity with \(r\): \(E_r(r) = \frac{C_2}{\epsilon(r) r^2}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) A point charge \(Q\) lies at the origin. Show that div \(\mathbf{D}\) is zero everywhere except at the origin. (b) Replace the point charge with a uniform volume charge density \(\rho_{v 0}\) for \(0

State whether the divergence of the following vector fields is positive, negative, or zero: ( \(a\) ) the thermal energy flow in \(\mathrm{J} /\left(\mathrm{m}^{2}-\mathrm{s}\right)\) at any point in a freezing ice cube; \((b)\) the current density in \(\mathrm{A} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) in a bus bar carrying direct current; \((c)\) the mass flow rate in \(\mathrm{kg} /\left(\mathrm{m}^{2}-\mathrm{s}\right)\) below the surface of water in a basin, in which the water is circulating clockwise as viewed from above.

Calculate \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}\) at the point specified if \((a) \mathbf{D}=\left(1 / z^{2}\right)\left[10 x y z \mathbf{a}_{x}+\right.\) \(\left.5 x^{2} z \mathbf{a}_{y}+\left(2 z^{3}-5 x^{2} y\right) \mathbf{a}_{z}\right]\) at \(P(-2,3,5) ;(b) \mathbf{D}=5 z^{2} \mathbf{a}_{\rho}+10 \rho z \mathbf{a}_{z}\) at \(P\left(3,-45^{\circ}, 5\right) ;(c) \mathbf{D}=2 r \sin \theta \sin \phi \mathbf{a}_{r}+r \cos \theta \sin \phi \mathbf{a}_{\theta}+r \cos \phi \mathbf{a}_{\phi}\) at \(P\left(3,45^{\circ},-45^{\circ}\right) .\)

A certain light-emitting diode (LED) is centered at the origin with its surface in the \(x y\) plane. At far distances, the LED appears as a point, but the glowing surface geometry produces a far-field radiation pattern that follows a raised cosine law: that is, the optical power (flux) density in watts \(/ \mathrm{m}^{2}\) is given in spherical coordinates by $$ \mathbf{P}_{d}=P_{0} \frac{\cos ^{2} \theta}{2 \pi r^{2}} \mathbf{a}_{r} \quad \text { watts } / \mathrm{m}^{2} $$ where \(\theta\) is the angle measured with respect to the direction that is normal to the LED surface (in this case, the \(z\) axis), and \(r\) is the radial distance from the origin at which the power is detected. \((a)\) In terms of \(P_{0}\), find the total power in watts emitted in the upper half-space by the LED; (b) Find the cone angle, \(\theta_{1}\), within which half the total power is radiated, that is, within the range \(0<\theta<\theta_{1} ;\) ( \(c\) ) An optical detector, having a \(1-\mathrm{mm}^{2}\) cross-sectional area, is positioned at \(r=1 \mathrm{~m}\) and at \(\theta=45^{\circ}\), such that it faces the \(\mathrm{LED}\). If one milliwatt is measured by the detector, what (to a very good estimate) is the value of \(P_{0}\) ?

Given the flux density \(\mathbf{D}=\frac{16}{r} \cos (2 \theta) \mathbf{a}_{\theta} \mathrm{C} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\), use two different methods to find the total charge within the region \(1

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free