Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) Find the maximum number of lines per centimeter a diffraction grating can have and produce a maximum for the smallest wavelength of visible light. (b) Would such a grating be useful for ultraviolet spectra? (c) For infrared spectra?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The maximum number of lines per centimeter is 26,300.

(b) Yes, in the ultraviolet spectrum, such a diffraction grating element would be useful. It would be able to generate additional diffraction pattern peaks as a result.

(c) No, such a diffraction grating element would be useless for the infrared spectrum because no peaks would be generated.

Step by step solution

01

Concept Introduction

The ultraviolet spectrum covers the wavelengths shorter than visible light.

The infrared spectrum includes wavelengths longer than visible light.

02

Determine The maximum number of lines per centimeter.(a)

The equation of the constructive interference can be expressed as

θsinλ …………………(1)

Where, d, λ, θand m is the separation between slits, the wavelength of the incident light, and the angle made with the maximum and order of maximum, respectively.

The number of lines per unit length in the diffraction grating element is given by the reciprocal of the distance , i.e.

N=1d

As a result, equation (1) may be rewritten as follows:

=sinθN…………………………(2)

Now, if we rewrite this equation in terms of the number of lines we have, we get N.

N=sinθ …………………………….(3)

The number of lines per unit length in a diffraction grating is greatest when the numerator is biggest and the denominator is smallest, i.e. when sinθ=1; and the smallest value that N may have is 1, hence the maximum number of lines per unit length is thus,

Nmax=1λ

And since it's asking for the maximum number of lines capable of producing diffraction maxima for the smallest value of wavelength in the visible spectrum, and since the smallest value of wavelength in the visible spectrum is 380nm, we replace it with 380nmin the above equation, giving us,

Nmax=1380nm1nm109m=2.63×101

This means that the maximum number of lines per meter of this diffraction grating element is role="math" localid="1654072425428" 2.63×106 lines, and as there are 100cmin1m, we simply divide by 100 to get the number of lines per cm, and therefore the number of lines per cmis thus,

Nmax=2.63×103cm1

Addendum: It's worth noting that equation (2) can be rewritten as follows:

sinθ=mNλ ………………..(3)

If we round the number of lines to keep the number of significant figures the same, we must be careful not to round to a larger number, since this would indicate thatsinθ>1which is not a legitimate answer; as a result, we always round to a lesser number in this case as an exception.

Therefore, 26,300 lines per cm.

03

Determine whether the grating be useful for ultraviolet spectra(b)

Therefore, we use the value of Nmax from part (a) and substitute it in equation (3), and using a value of 100nm for UV wave as an example, we get:

sinθ=m×2.63×106m1×100nm109m1nm=0.263×m

And since the sine function's maximum value is 1, this means that the value of mwill be,

m=10.263=3.8

Becausemis an integer, it can take up to four values, or in other words, there will be a maximum of four orders in addition to the center maximum. As a result, a diffraction grating of this type might be beneficial in the UV spectrum.

Therefore, yes, in the ultraviolet spectrum, such a diffraction grating element would be useful. It would be able to generate additional diffraction pattern peaks as a result.

04

Determine whether the grating be useful for infrared spectra(c)

So, using a value of 1000nmas an infrared wave value in equation (3), however, we find that the maximum value of nis,

sinθ=m×2.63×106m1×1000nm109m1nm=2.63×m

And since the sine function's maximum value is 1, this means that the value of mwill be,

m=12.63=0.38

Because mcan only take integer values, there is no first-order maximum, hence such diffraction grating elements would be useless in the infrared spectrum.

Therefore, no, such a diffraction grating element would be useless because no peaks would be generated.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the wavelength of light falling on double slits separated by 2.00 µm if the third-order maximum is at an angle of 60.0º ?

Red light of wavelength of 700 nm falls on a double slit separated by 400 nm. (a) At what angle is the first-order maximum in the diffraction pattern? (b) What is unreasonable about this result? (c) Which assumptions are unreasonable or inconsistent?

Why is it much more difficult to see interference fringes for light reflected from a thick piece of glass than from a thin film? Would it be easier if monochromatic light were used?

Structures on a bird feather act like a reflection grating having8000lines per centimeter. What is the angle of the first-order maximum for 600nmlight?

The \(300 - m\)-diameter Arecibo radio telescope pictured in Figure \(27.28\) detects radio waves with a \(4.00{\rm{ }}cm\) average wavelength.

(a) What is the angle between two just-resolvable point sources for this telescope?

(b) How close together could these point sources be at the \({\rm{2}}\) million light year distance of the Andromeda galaxy?

Figure \(27.28\) A \(305 - m\)-diameter natural bowl at Arecibo in Puerto Rico is lined with reflective material, making it into a radio telescope. It is the largest curved focusing dish in the world. Although \(D\) for Arecibo is much larger than for the Hubble Telescope, it detects much longer wavelength radiation and its difdfraction limit is significantly poorer than Hubble's. Arecibo is still very useful, because important information is carried by radio waves that is not carried by visible light. (credit: Tatyana Temirbulatova, Flickr)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free