Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Olbers’s paradox poses an interesting question: If the universe is infinite, then any line of sight should eventually fall on a star’s surface. Why then is the sky dark at night? Discuss the commonly accepted evolution of the universe as a solution to this paradox.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The proposed light, known as cosmic microwave background radiation, exists but is redshifted, making it invisible to the naked eye.

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Definition of Olbers’s paradox.

The Olbers’s paradox states that if the universe is infinite then any line of sight should eventually fall on a star’s surface.

02

Commonly accepted evolution of the universe as a solution of why sky is dark at night?

According to the Big Bang theory, this was true during the early stages of the universe's evolution when the "night sky" was extremely bright, and it is still true in some ways today.

The difference is that, as the universe expands, all of the light is redshifted, resulting in a dark night sky with cosmic microwave background radiation - radiation of constant wavelength perceptible from all directions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Black holes with masses smaller than those formed in supernovas may have been created in the Big Bang. Calculate the radius of one that has a mass equal to the Earth’s.

What is the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole that has a mass eight times that of our Sun? Note that stars must be more massive than the Sun to form black holes as a result of a supernova.

Discuss the possibility that star velocities at the edges of galaxies being greater than expected is due to unknown properties of gravity rather than to the existence of dark matter. Would this mean, for example, that gravity is greater or smaller than expected at large distances? Are there other tests that could be made of gravity at large distances, such as observing the motions of neighbouring galaxies?

Suppose you measure the red shifts of all the images produced by gravitational lensing, such as in figure below. You find that the central image has a red shift less than the outer images, and those all have the same red shift. Discuss how this not only shows that the images are of the same object, but also implies that the red shift is not affected by taking different paths through space. Does it imply that cosmological red shifts are not caused by traveling through space (light getting tired, perhaps)?

Suppose black holes radiate their mass away and the lifetime of a black hole created by a supernova is about \({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{67}}}}\)years. How does this lifetime compare with the accepted age of the universe? Is it surprising that we do not observe the predicted characteristic radiation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free