Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Another known cause of red shift in light is the source being in a high gravitational field. Discuss how this can be eliminated as the source of galactic red shifts, given that the shifts are proportional to distance and not to the size of the galaxy.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The observed galaxy's gravitational redshift cancels out most of the Milky Way's blue shift. Because travelling through empty space does not cause a gravitational redshift/blueshift, any residual shift would not be proportional to distance.

Step by step solution

01

 Definition of red shifts.

The Red shift occurs due to the difference effect of gravitational field acting on the observer and source. The gravitational red shift is observed when the source is in high gravitational field.

02

How the gravitational field can be eliminated as the source of galactic red shifts?

Gravitational redshift occurs when light is emitted from a higher gravitational potential and travels towards a lower gravitational potential. When we observe light from a distance, it first escapes from the gravitational field of the star and then enters the gravitational field of the Earth. During its escape, redshift occurs (because it is travelling from a higher gravitational potential, closer to the star, to a lower gravitational potential, further from the star), and during observation, blue shift occurs (lower potential further from the Earth, higher closer to the Earth). Because the mass-to-radius ratio of galaxies is nearly the same, gravitational red shift is almost eliminated.

Furthermore, any residual shift would not be proportional to distance because gravitational redshift occurs when travelling through gravitational fields, so travelling through empty space (with negligible gravity) should have no effect on the shift.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The critical mass density needed to just halt the expansion of the universe is approximately\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{ - 26}}}}{\rm{ kg/}}{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{3}}}\). (a) Convert this to\({\rm{eV/}}{{\rm{c}}^{\rm{2}}} \cdot {{\rm{m}}^{\rm{3}}}\). (b) Find the number of neutrinos per cubic meter needed to close the universe if their average mass is\({\rm{7 eV/}}{{\rm{c}}^{\rm{2}}}\)and they have negligible kinetic energies.

For experimental evidence, particularly of previously unobserved phenomena, to be taken seriously it must be reproducible or of sufficiently high quality that a single observation is meaningful. Supernovais not reproducible. How do we know observations of it were valid? The fifth force is not broadly accepted. Is this due to lack of reproducibility or poor-quality experiments (or both)? Discuss why forefront experiments are more subject to observational problems than those involving established phenomena.

To get an idea of how empty deep space is on the average, perform the following calculations: (a) Find the volume our Sun would occupy if it had an average density equal to the critical density of\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{ - 26}}}}{\rm{kg/}}{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{3}}}\)thought necessary to halt the expansion of the universe. (b) Find the radius of a sphere of this volume in light years. (c) What would this radius be if the density were that of luminous matter, which is approximately\({\rm{5 \% }}\)that of the critical density? (d) Compare the radius found in part (c) with the\({\rm{4 - ly}}\)average separation of stars in the arms of the Milky Way.

(a) Estimate the mass of the luminous matter in the known universe, given there are\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{11}}}}\)galaxies, each containing\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{11}}}}\)stars of average mass\({\rm{1}}{\rm{.5}}\)times that of our Sun. (b) How many protons (the most abundant nuclide) are there in this mass? (c) Estimate the total number of particles in the observable universe by multiplying the answer to (b) by two, since there is an electron for each proton, and then by\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{\rm{9}}}\), since there are far more particles (such as photons and neutrinos) in space than in luminous matter.

How does relativistic time dilation prohibit neutrino oscillations if they are massless?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free