Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Lacking direct evidence of WIMPs as dark matter, why must we eliminate all other possible explanations based on the known forms of matter before we invoke their existence?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Because we must not complicate our theory by introducing additional particles if a better explanation can be found using existing forms of matter.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of WIMPs.

A WIMP has no precise description, but it is a new elementary particle that interacts with gravity and any other force (or forces) that is as weak as or weaker than the weak nuclear force, but non-vanishing in strength.

02

Explaining Occam's razor.

Occam's razor is a problem-solving principle that states that if two theories provide equally precise explanations and predictions, the one with fewer assumptions is the "right" one.

With this in mind, if dark matter can be explained using existing particles, Occam's razor suggests that there is no need to include new particles, as this would complicate our hypothesis unnecessarily.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) A particle and its antiparticle are at rest relative to an observer and annihilate (completely destroying both masses), creating two\({\rm{\gamma }}\)rays of equal energy. What is the characteristic\({\rm{\gamma }}\)-ray energy you would look for if searching for evidence of proton-antiproton annihilation? (The fact that such radiation is rarely observed is evidence that there is very little antimatter in the universe.) (b) How does this compare with the\({\rm{0}}{\rm{.511 MeV}}\)energy associated with electron-positron annihilation?

(a) Use the Heisenberg uncertainty principle to calculate the uncertainty in energy for a corresponding time interval of\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{ - 43}}}}{\rm{ s}}\). (b) Compare this energy with the\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{19}}}}{\rm{ GeV}}\)unification-of-forces energy and discuss why they are similar.

Not only is liquid nitrogen a cheaper coolant than liquid helium, its boiling point is higher (\({\rm{77 K}}\)vs\({\rm{4}}{\rm{.2 K}}\)). How does higher temperature help lower the cost of cooling a material? Explain in terms of the rate of heat transfer being related to the temperature difference between the sample and its surroundings.

On average, how far away are galaxies that are moving away from us at\({\rm{2}}{\rm{.0 \% }}\)of the speed of light?

The critical mass density needed to just halt the expansion of the universe is approximately\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{ - 26}}}}{\rm{ kg/}}{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{3}}}\). (a) Convert this to\({\rm{eV/}}{{\rm{c}}^{\rm{2}}} \cdot {{\rm{m}}^{\rm{3}}}\). (b) Find the number of neutrinos per cubic meter needed to close the universe if their average mass is\({\rm{7 eV/}}{{\rm{c}}^{\rm{2}}}\)and they have negligible kinetic energies.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free