Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Using data from the previous problem, find the increase in rotational kinetic energy, given the core’s mass is\({\rm{1}}{\rm{.3}}\)times that of our Sun. Where does this increase in kinetic energy come from?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The required increase in rotation kinetic energy is \({\rm{1}}{\rm{.90}} \times {\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{45}}\,{\rm{J}}\).

Step by step solution

01

Kinetic energy and moment of inertia

The expression for the rotational kinetic energy is given by,

\(KE = \frac{1}{2}I{\omega ^2}\) …… (i)

Here\(I\)is the moment of inertia,\(\omega \)is the angular frequency and\(KE\)is the kinetic energy.

The moment of a spherical part like star can be given by,

\(I = \frac{2}{5}M{r^2}\) …… (ii)

Here\(M\)is the mass of the star and\(r\)is the radius of the star.

The expression for the angular frequency is given by,

\(\omega = 2\pi f\)…… (iii)

Here\(f\)is the frequency.

02

Evaluating the increase in rotational kinetic energy

Substitute \(\frac{2}{5}M{r^2}\) for \(I\) and \(2\pi f\) for \(\omega \) into the equation (i)

\(KE = \frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{2}{5}M{r^2}} \right){\left( {2\pi f} \right)^2}\)…… (iv)

Calculate initial kinetic energy,

Substitute\(5 \times {10^8}\,{\rm{m}}\)for\(r\),\(1.3 \times 1.99 \times {10^{30}}\,{\rm{kg}}\)for\(M\)and\(3.858 \times {10^{ - 7}}\,{\rm{s}}\)for\(f\)into the equation (iv)

\(\begin{array}{c}K{E_i} &= \frac{1}{2}\left( {1.3} \right)\left( {1.99 \times {{10}^{30}}\,{\rm{kg}}} \right){\left( {5.0 \times {{10}^8}\,{\rm{m}}} \right)^2}{\left( {2\pi } \right)^2}{\left( {3.858 \times {{10}^{ - 7}}\,{{\rm{s}}^{{\rm{ - 1}}}}} \right)^2}\\ &= 7.60 \times {10^{35}}\,{\rm{J}}\end{array}\)

Calculate the final kinetic energy,

Substitute\(10 \times {10^3}\,{\rm{m}}\)for\(r\),\(1.3 \times 1.99 \times {10^{30}}\,{\rm{kg}}\)for\(M\)and\(964.5\,{\rm{rev/s}}\)for\(f\)into the equation (iv)

\(\begin{array}{c}K{E_f} &= \frac{1}{2}\left( {1.3} \right)\left( {1.99 \times {{10}^{30}}\,{\rm{kg}}} \right){\left( {10.0 \times {{10}^3}\,{\rm{m}}} \right)^2}{\left( {2\pi } \right)^2}{\left( {964.5\,{{\rm{s}}^{{\rm{ - 1}}}}} \right)^2}\\ &= 1.90 \times {10^{45}}\,{\rm{J}}\end{array}\)

Calculate the increase in kinetic energy,

\(\begin{array}{c}\Delta KE &= K{E_f} - K{E_i}\\ &= 1.90 \times {10^{45}}\,{\rm{J}}\, - 7.60 \times {10^{35}}\,{\rm{J}}\\ &= {\rm{1}}{\rm{.90}} \times {\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{45}}\,{\rm{J}}\end{array}\)

Therefore the required increase in rotation kinetic energy is \({\rm{1}}{\rm{.90}} \times {\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{45}}\,{\rm{J}}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A section of superconducting wire carries a current of\({\rm{100 A}}\)and requires\({\rm{1}}{\rm{.00 L}}\)of liquid nitrogen per hour to keep it below its critical temperature. For it to be economically advantageous to use a superconducting wire, the cost of cooling the wire must be less than the cost of energy lost to heat in the wire. Assume that the cost of liquid nitrogen is\({\rm{\$ 0}}{\rm{.30}}\)per litre, and that electric energy costs\({\rm{\$ 0}}{\rm{.10}}\)per KW·h. What is the resistance of a normal wire that costs as much in wasted electric energy as the cost of liquid nitrogen for the superconductor?

(a) A particle and its antiparticle are at rest relative to an observer and annihilate (completely destroying both masses), creating two\({\rm{\gamma }}\)rays of equal energy. What is the characteristic\({\rm{\gamma }}\)-ray energy you would look for if searching for evidence of proton-antiproton annihilation? (The fact that such radiation is rarely observed is evidence that there is very little antimatter in the universe.) (b) How does this compare with the\({\rm{0}}{\rm{.511 MeV}}\)energy associated with electron-positron annihilation?

For experimental evidence, particularly of previously unobserved phenomena, to be taken seriously it must be reproducible or of sufficiently high quality that a single observation is meaningful. Supernovais not reproducible. How do we know observations of it were valid? The fifth force is not broadly accepted. Is this due to lack of reproducibility or poor-quality experiments (or both)? Discuss why forefront experiments are more subject to observational problems than those involving established phenomena.

Is the event horizon of a black hole the actual physical surface of the object?

How does relativistic time dilation prohibit neutrino oscillations if they are massless?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free