Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Is the event horizon of a black hole the actual physical surface of the object?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It isn't, however it is necessary for comprehending how black holes function.

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Step 1:Definition of black hole.

The existence of black holes, objects for which the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light and from which nothing can escape.

02

Finding whether event horizon of the black hole in actual surface of object?

The event horizon is a theoretical construct that is important in understanding black hole dynamics. In the same manner that an open door represents a surface, the event horizon does as well. You can plainly determine where the door was since you can see the "door surface," but you can also pass it because there is no hard physical boundary.

The event horizon is intriguing because once crossed, it is impossible to return, much like a door that is open on one side but locked on the other.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If the dark matter in the Milky Way were composed entirely of MACHOs (evidence shows it is not), approximately how many would there have to be? Assume the average mass of a MACHO is\({\rm{1/1000}}\)that of the Sun, and that dark matter has a mass\({\rm{10}}\)times that of the luminous Milky Way galaxy with its\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{11}}}}\)stars of average mass\({\rm{1}}{\rm{.5}}\)times the Sunโ€™s mass.

Find the approximate mass of the luminous matter in the Milky Way galaxy, given it has approximately\({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{11}}}}\)stars of average mass\({\rm{1}}{\rm{.5}}\)times that of our Sun.

Suppose black holes radiate their mass away and the lifetime of a black hole created by a supernova is about \({\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{67}}}}\)years. How does this lifetime compare with the accepted age of the universe? Is it surprising that we do not observe the predicted characteristic radiation?

Another known cause of red shift in light is the source being in a high gravitational field. Discuss how this can be eliminated as the source of galactic red shifts, given that the shifts are proportional to distance and not to the size of the galaxy.

(a) A particle and its antiparticle are at rest relative to an observer and annihilate (completely destroying both masses), creating two\({\rm{\gamma }}\)rays of equal energy. What is the characteristic\({\rm{\gamma }}\)-ray energy you would look for if searching for evidence of proton-antiproton annihilation? (The fact that such radiation is rarely observed is evidence that there is very little antimatter in the universe.) (b) How does this compare with the\({\rm{0}}{\rm{.511 MeV}}\)energy associated with electron-positron annihilation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free