Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(f(t)\) be a periodic function with period \(\tau\). Explain clearly why the average of \(f\) over one period is not necessarily the same as the average over some other time interval. Explain why, on the other hand, the average over a long time \(T\) approaches the average over one period, as \(T \rightarrow \infty\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The average over one period may differ from other intervals, but averages converge as time interval grows longer.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding a Periodic Function

A periodic function, like \(f(t)\), repeats its values in regular intervals, known as its period \(\tau\). This means that the behavior of \(f(t)\) is consistent over each segment of length \(\tau\), making \(f(t + \tau) = f(t)\) for any \(t\).
02

Average Over One Period

The average value of \(f(t)\) over one period \(\tau\) is calculated as \(\frac{1}{\tau}\int_{0}^{\tau} f(t) \, dt\). This represents how the values of \(f(t)\) are distributed over a single cycle.
03

Difference with Average Over Other Intervals

If we take an average over a time interval different from \(\tau\), say from \(0\) to \(T\) (where \(T\) is not a multiple of \(\tau\)), the function \(f(t)\) may not complete its periods entirely within \(T\). Thus, some parts of \(f(t)\) might be overrepresented or underrepresented, leading to an average that differs from the one-period average.
04

Approaching the Period Average as Time Increases

When taking the average over a long time \(T\), the interval \(T\) can potentially include many full periods of \(f(t)\). As \(T \rightarrow \infty\), any discrepancies from incomplete periods at the beginning or end of the interval become negligible. Thus, the average value over \(T\) approaches the average over a complete period. This can be expressed as \(\frac{1}{T}\int_{0}^{T} f(t) \, dt \approx \frac{1}{\tau}\int_{0}^{\tau} f(t) \, dt \) as \(T \rightarrow \infty\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Average Value Over a Period
In mathematics, the average value of a periodic function over one complete period is a foundational concept. When we talk about periodic functions like \( f(t) \), which consistently repeat their behavior every period \( \tau \), this periodicity ensures predictability over each cycle. The average is obtained by integrating the function over one entire period and then dividing by the period length, given by the formula: \[ \text{Average over one period} = \frac{1}{\tau}\int_{0}^{\tau} f(t) \, dt \]This calculation tells us how the function behaves over each individual cycle. It assumes that each possible value within a cycle contributes proportionally to the average. For instance, if \( f(t) \) represents a sine wave, the average over one full sine wave cycle would consider both the ups and downs balanced over a complete period.
Incomplete Periods
When a periodic function is averaged over an interval that does not line up perfectly with its period, such as \( T \) where \( T eq n\tau \) for any integer \( n \), we encounter the challenge of incomplete periods. Imagine slicing through a loaf of bread—the slices don’t complete a full loaf exactly, leading to uneven pieces. Similarly, in an incomplete period, parts of \( f(t) \) might not be represented fully. This results in some values being counted more than others, while others may be missed completely, skewing the average. For example, if our interval stops halfway through an oscillation, the average becomes biased towards that partially completed oscillation. This difference occurs because the function might not return to its starting point, creating an imbalance in representation.
Long-Term Averaging
Long-term averaging is like observing a constant drip turning into a steady stream. When you average \( f(t) \) over a very large interval \( T \), the partial periods at start and end become increasingly insignificant. This is because the ratio of partial periods to complete periods decreases as \( T \) becomes very large. Thus, expressed mathematically, the long-term average:\[ \lim_{T \to \infty} \frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T} f(t) \, dt = \frac{1}{\tau} \int_{0}^{\tau} f(t) \, dt \]ensures the function’s true periodic nature eventually dominates any initial irregularities. This situation reflects the principle of ergodicity, where time averages and ensemble averages yield the same result in the limit, assuming the function is reasonably well-behaved. By considering ever longer times, you "smooth out" any discrepancies caused by incomplete cycles, converging towards the true average of the period.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a simple harmonic oscillator with period \(\tau\). Let \(\langle f\rangle\) denote the average value of any variable \(f(t),\) averaged over one complete cycle: $$\langle f\rangle=\frac{1}{\tau} \int_{0}^{\tau} f(t) d t$$ Prove that \(\langle T\rangle=\langle U\rangle=\frac{1}{2} E\) where \(E\) is the total energy of the oscillator. [Hint: Start by proving the more general, and extremely useful, results that \(\left\langle\sin ^{2}(\omega t-\delta)\right\rangle=\left\langle\cos ^{2}(\omega t-\delta)\right\rangle=\frac{1}{2} .\) Explain why these two results are almost obvious, then prove them by using trig identities to rewrite \(\sin ^{2} \theta\) and \(\left.\cos ^{2} \theta \text { in terms of } \cos (2 \theta) .\right]\)

Consider an underdamped oscillator (such as a mass on the end of a spring) that is released from rest at position \(x_{\mathrm{o}}\) at time \(t=0 .\) (a) Find the position \(x(t)\) at later times in the form $$x(t)=e^{-\beta t}\left[B_{1} \cos \left(\omega_{1} t\right)+B_{2} \sin \left(\omega_{1} t\right)\right]$$ That is, find \(B_{1}\) and \(B_{2}\) in terms of \(x_{\mathrm{o}}\). (b) Now show that if you let \(\beta\) approach the critical value \(\omega_{\mathrm{o}}\) your solution automatically yields the critical solution. (c) Using appropriate graphing software, plot the solution for \(0 \leq t \leq 20,\) with \(x_{\mathrm{o}}=1, \omega_{\mathrm{o}}=1,\) and \(\beta=0,0.02,0.1,0.3,\) and 1

The potential energy of two atoms in a molecule can sometimes be approximated by the Morse function, $$U(r)=A\left[\left(e^{(R-r) / S}-1\right)^{2}-1\right]$$ where \(r\) is the distance between the two atoms and \(A, R,\) and \(S\) are positive constants with \(S \ll R .\) Sketch this function for \(0 < r < \infty\). Find the equilibrium separation \(r_{\mathrm{o}}\), at which \(U(r)\) is minimum. Now write \(r=r_{\mathrm{o}}+x\) so that \(x\) is the displacement from equilibrium, and show that, for small displacements, \(U\) has the approximate form \(U=\) const \(+\frac{1}{2} k x^{2} .\) That is, Hooke's law applies. What is the force constant \(k ?\)

We know that if the driving frequency \(\omega\) is varied, the maximum response \(\left(A^{2}\right)\) of a driven damped oscillator occurs at \(\omega \approx \omega_{\mathrm{o}}\) (if the natural frequency is \(\omega_{\mathrm{o}}\) and the damping constant \(\beta \ll\) \(\omega_{\mathrm{o}}\) ). Show that \(A^{2}\) is equal to half its maximum value when \(\omega \approx \omega_{\mathrm{o}} \pm \beta,\) so that the full width at half maximum is just \(2 \beta\). [Hint: Be careful with your approximations. For instance, it's fine to say \(\left.\omega+\omega_{\mathrm{o}} \approx 2 \omega_{\mathrm{o}}, \text { but you certainly mustn't say } \omega-\omega_{\mathrm{o}} \approx 0 .\right]\)

Suppose that you have found a particular solution \(x_{\mathrm{p}}(t)\) of the inhomogeneous equation (5.48) for a driven damped oscillator, so that \(D x_{\mathrm{p}}=f\) in the operator notation of \((5.49) .\) Suppose also that \(x(t)\) is any other solution, so that \(D x=f .\) Prove that the difference \(x-x_{\mathrm{p}}\) must satisfy the corresponding homogeneous equation, \(D\left(x-x_{\mathrm{p}}\right)=0 .\) This is an alternative proof that any solution \(x\) of the inhomogeneous equation can be written as the sum of your particular solution plus a homogeneous solution; that is, \(x=x_{\mathrm{p}}+x_{\mathrm{h}}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free