Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A particle of mass \(m_{1}\) and speed \(v_{1}\) collides with a second particle of mass \(m_{2}\) at rest. If the collision is perfectly inelastic (the two particles lock together and move off as one) what fraction of the kinetic energy is lost in the collision? Comment on your answer for the cases that \(m_{1} \ll m_{2}\) and that \(m_{2} \ll m_{1}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The fraction of kinetic energy lost is \(1 - \frac{m_{1}}{m_{1} + m_{2}}\). For \(m_{1} \ll m_{2}\), most kinetic energy is lost; for \(m_{2} \ll m_{1}\), little is lost.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the concept of a perfectly inelastic collision

A perfectly inelastic collision is one in which two objects collide and move together as a single object after the collision. In such a collision, kinetic energy is not conserved, but momentum is conserved.
02

Write the conservation of momentum equation

The law of conservation of momentum states that the total momentum before the collision is equal to the total momentum after the collision. For our particles, this can be written as:\[ m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2} imes 0 = (m_{1} + m_{2})v \]Where \(v\) is the final velocity of the combined mass after the collision.
03

Solve for final velocity after collision

Using the momentum conservation equation from Step 2, solve for the final velocity \(v\):\[ v = \frac{m_{1}v_{1}}{m_{1} + m_{2}} \]
04

Express initial kinetic energy

Calculate the initial kinetic energy (KE) of the system, which is only due to the first particle since the second one is initially at rest:\[ KE_{ ext{initial}} = \frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^2 \]
05

Express final kinetic energy after collision

Calculate the final kinetic energy (KE) of the combined mass moving with velocity \(v\):\[ KE_{ ext{final}} = \frac{1}{2}(m_{1} + m_{2})v^2 \]Substitute the expression for \(v\) from Step 3:\[ KE_{ ext{final}} = \frac{1}{2}(m_{1} + m_{2})\left(\frac{m_{1}v_{1}}{m_{1} + m_{2}}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{2}\frac{m_{1}^2v_{1}^2}{m_{1} + m_{2}} \]
06

Calculate the fraction of kinetic energy lost

The kinetic energy lost \( \Delta KE \) is the difference between the initial and final kinetic energies:\[ \Delta KE = KE_{\text{initial}} - KE_{\text{final}} = \frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^2 - \frac{1}{2}\frac{m_{1}^2v_{1}^2}{m_{1} + m_{2}} \]The fraction of kinetic energy lost is:\[ \text{Fraction lost} = \frac{\Delta KE}{KE_{\text{initial}}} = 1 - \frac{m_{1}}{m_{1} + m_{2}} \]
07

Comment on special cases

For \(m_{1} \ll m_{2}\):- \(\text{Fraction lost} \approx 1\). Almost all kinetic energy is lost as the smaller mass is absorbed.For \(m_{2} \ll m_{1}\):- \(\text{Fraction lost} \approx 0\). The kinetic energy remains mostly intact as the larger mass continues moving with nearly the same velocity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Kinetic Energy Loss
When two objects collide, especially in a perfectly inelastic collision where they stick together, a portion of the initial kinetic energy does not remain in the system. This energy could be transformed into other forms, such as sound, heat, or internal energy. The energy transformation arises because kinetic energy is not conserved during such a collision, though momentum is.

In the context of the exercise, the initial kinetic energy is held by the moving particle, and it's given by the expression \[ KE_\text{initial} = \frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^2 \].

Once the collision occurs and the objects combine, the final kinetic energy changes since the total mass and velocity have been altered. After solving for the final kinetic energy, you use the difference to determine the energy lost portion: \[ \Delta KE = KE_{\text{initial}} - KE_{\text{final}}. \]

This difference represents the kinetic energy dissipated in other forms during the collision. Understanding this energy exchange helps in a variety of physics problems, illustrating the interplay between energy and motion.
Momentum Conservation
In any type of collision, including perfectly inelastic ones, the total momentum of the system is conserved.

The conservation principle states that the total momentum before an interaction equals the total momentum afterward, assuming no external forces act on the system. For the given exercise, the initial momentum was entirely due to the particle in motion, described as: \[ m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2} \times 0. \]

After the collision, both particles move as a single entity, and their mutual final momentum becomes:\[ (m_{1} + m_{2})v. \] By setting these two expressions equal, we calculate the final velocity using: \[ v = \frac{m_{1}v_{1}}{m_{1} + m_{2}}. \]

This setup demonstrates how the velocity of the combined mass can be derived from the original momentum.
  • **Key Point**: Momentum conservation provides insight into post-collision movement, despite the complex transformations of energy that occur in perfectly inelastic collisions.
Perfectly Inelastic Collision
In a perfectly inelastic collision, the key characteristic is the complete merging and sticking together of the colliding masses after impact. This concept underscores why kinetic energy does not remain completely conserved, despite momentum being intact.

The resulting single body, with mass \((m_{1} + m_{2})\), travels with a velocity derived from prior momentum calculations: \[ v = \frac{m_{1}v_{1}}{m_{1} + m_{2}}. \]

With their collective movement, the energy profile of the collision shifts markedly. If the first mass is much smaller than the second (\(m_{1} \ll m_{2}\)), almost all kinetic energy is drained, with most converting to internal energies or other forms. Conversely, if the second mass is minor compared to the first (\(m_{2} \ll m_{1}\)), minimal kinetic energy is lost, and post-collision movement closely reflects the initial conditions.
  • **Perfectly Inelastic Collisions**: Often serve as models in physics problems illustrating how energy dissipation and momentum conservation work together uniquely.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The proof that the condition \(\nabla \times \mathbf{F}=0\) guarantees the path independence of the work \(\int_{1}^{2} \mathbf{F} \cdot d \mathbf{r}\) done by \(\mathbf{F}\) is unfortunately too lengthy to be included here. However, the following three exercises capture the main points: \(^{16}\) (a) Show that the path independence of \(\int_{1}^{2} \mathbf{F} \cdot d \mathbf{r}\) is equivalent to the statement that the integral \(\oint_{\mathrm{T}} \mathbf{F} \cdot d \mathbf{r}\) around any closed path \(\Gamma\) is zero. (By tradition, the symbol \(\oint\) is used for integrals around a closed path \(-\) a path that starts and stops at the same point.) [Hint: For any two points 1 and 2 and any two paths from 1 to 2 , consider the work done by \(\mathbf{F}\) going from 1 to 2 along the first path and then back to 1 along the second in the reverse direction. \((\) b) Stokes's theorem asserts that \(\oint_{\mathrm{T}} \mathbf{F} \cdot d \mathbf{r}=\int(\nabla \times \mathbf{F}) \cdot \hat{\mathbf{n}} d A,\) where the integral on the right is a surface integral over a surface for which the path \(\Gamma\) is the boundary, and \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\) and \(d A\) are a unit normal to the surface and an element of area. Show that Stokes's theorem implies that if \(\nabla \times \mathbf{F}=0\) everywhere, then \(\oint_{\mathrm{T}} \mathbf{F} \cdot d \mathbf{r}=0 .\) (c) While the general proof of Stokes's theorem is beyond our scope here, the following special case is quite easy to prove (and is an important step toward the general proof): Let \(\Gamma\) denote a rectangular closed path lying in a plane perpendicular to the \(z\) direction and bounded by the lines \(x=B, x=B+b, y=C\) and \(y=C+c .\) For this simple path (traced counterclockwise as seen from above), prove Strokes's theorem that \(\oint_{\Gamma} \mathbf{F} \cdot d \mathbf{r}=\int(\mathbf{\nabla} \times \mathbf{F}) \cdot \hat{\mathbf{n}} d A\) where \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}=\hat{\mathbf{z}}\) and the integral on the right runs over the flat, rectangular area inside \(\Gamma\). [Hint: The integral on the left contains four terms, two of which are integrals over \(x\) and two over \(y\). If you pair them in this way, you can combine each pair into a single integral with an integrand of the form \(F_{x}(x, C+c, z)-F_{x}(x, C, z)\) (or a similar term with the roles of \(x\) and \(y\) exchanged). You can rewrite this integrand as an integral over \(y\) of \(\partial F_{x}(x, y, z) / \partial y\) (and similarly with the other term), and you're home.]

Consider the Atwood machine of Figure \(4.15,\) but suppose that the pulley has radius \(R\) and moment of inertia \(I\). (a) Write down the total energy of the two masses and the pulley in terms of the coordinate \(x\) and \(\dot{x}\). (Remember that the kinetic energy of a spinning wheel is \(\frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}\).) (b) Show (what is true for any conservative one-dimensional system) that you can obtain the equation of motion for the coordinate \(x\) by differentiating the equation \(E=\) const. Check that the equation of motion is the same as you would obtain by applying Newton's second law separately to the two masses and the pulley, and then eliminating the two unknown tensions from the three resulting equations.

Find the partial derivatives with respect to \(x, y,\) and \(z\) of the following functions: (a) \(f(x, y, z)=\) \(a y^{2}+2 b y z+c z^{2},(\mathbf{b}) g(x, y, z)=\cos \left(a x y^{2} z^{3}\right),(\mathbf{c}) h(x, y, z)=a r,\) where \(a, b,\) and \(c\) are constants and \(r=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}} .\) Remember that to evaluate \(\partial f / \partial x\) you differentiate with respect to \(x\) treating \(y\) and \(z\) as constants.

(a) Consider a mass \(m\) in a uniform gravitational field \(\mathbf{g},\) so that the force on \(m\) is \(m \mathbf{g},\) where \(\mathbf{g}\) is a constant vector pointing vertically down. If the mass moves by an arbitrary path from point 1 to point \(2,\) show that the work done by gravity is \(W_{\mathrm{grav}}(1 \rightarrow 2)=-m g h\) where \(h\) is the vertical height gained between points 1 and 2. Use this result to prove that the force of gravity is conservative (at least in a region small enough so that \(\mathrm{g}\) can be considered constant). (b) Show that, if we choose axes with \(y\) measured vertically up, the gravitational potential energy is \(U=m g y\) (if we choose \(U=0\) at the origin).

Calculate the gradient \(\nabla f\) of the following functions, \(f(x, y, z):\) (a) \(f=x^{2}+z^{3} .\) (b) \(f=k y\), where \(k\) is a constant. (c) \(f=r \equiv \sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}} .\) [Hint: Use the chain rule.] (d) \(f=1 / r\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free