Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Newton's first law can be stated: If an object is isolated (subject to no forces), then it moves with constant velocity. We know that this is invariant under the Galilean transformation. Prove that it is also invariant under the Lorentz transformation. [Assume that it is true in an inertial frame \(\mathcal{S}\), and use the relativistic velocity-addition formula to show that it is also true in any other \(\mathcal{S}^{\prime} .\) ]

Short Answer

Expert verified
Constant velocity in one frame remains constant in another frame, proving invariance.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Lorentz Transformation

The Lorentz transformation relates coordinates and time in one inertial frame \(\mathcal{S}\) to those in another \(\mathcal{S}'\), moving at velocity \(v\) relative to \(\mathcal{S}\). The transformations are given by: \[ x' = \gamma (x - vt), \, t' = \gamma (t - \frac{vx}{c^2}) \] where \(\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}\). This transformation assumes that the speed of light \(c\) is constant in all inertial frames.
02

Introducing Newton's First Law

Newton's first law states that if an object is isolated (no forces act on it), it will move with a constant velocity if viewed from any inertial frame. Mathematically, if \(\textbf{v} = \frac{d\textbf{r}}{dt}\) in frame \(\mathcal{S}\), then for an isolated object \(\textbf{v}\) is constant with zero acceleration \(\textbf{a} = \frac{d\textbf{v}}{dt} = 0\).
03

Relativistic Velocity Addition Formula

The velocity of an object in \(\mathcal{S}'\), \(u'\), can be found from its velocity in \(\mathcal{S}\), \(u\), using the relativistic velocity addition formula: \[ u' = \frac{u - v}{1 - \frac{uv}{c^2}} \] This formula accounts for the effects of special relativity, ensuring that the speed of light remains constant.
04

Prove Constant Velocity in \(\mathcal{S}'\)

If the object's velocity \(u\) is constant in \(\mathcal{S}\) (i.e., \(u = u_0\) and doesn't change with time), we expect \(u'\) also to be constant in \(\mathcal{S}'\). With \(u = u_0\), calculate \(u'\) using the velocity addition formula: \[ u' = \frac{u_0 - v}{1 - \frac{u_0v}{c^2}} \] Since \(u_0\) and \(v\) are constants, \(u'\) is also constant with respect to time.
05

Conclude Invariance

Both \(\mathcal{S}\) and \(\mathcal{S}'\) are inertial frames, and we have shown that a constant velocity in \(\mathcal{S}\) transforms to a constant velocity in \(\mathcal{S}'\). Thus, Newton's first law, which asserts constant velocity in the absence of force, holds true in all such relativistic frames, proving its invariance under Lorentz transformation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Lorentz Transformation
The Lorentz Transformation is a fundamental concept in Einstein's theory of Special Relativity. This transformation helps us understand how the measurements of time and space change between two different "inertial frames" (which are essentially reference frames moving at a constant velocity relative to each other). Imagine two observers, each in their own train car moving with constant speed but relative to each other. The Lorentz Transformation allows us to translate physical quantities measured by one observer to those measured by the other.

Key to this transformation is the constant speed of light, denoted by \(c\), which remains unchanged in all inertial frames. The equations are as follows:
  • \[ x' = \gamma (x - vt) \]
  • \[ t' = \gamma \left(t - \frac{vx}{c^2}\right) \]
Here, \(x\) and \(t\) are the space and time coordinates in the original frame \(\mathcal{S}\), and \(x'\) and \(t'\) are those in the moving frame \(\mathcal{S}'\). The term \(\gamma\) is called the Lorentz factor, given by \(\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}\), where \(v\) is the relative velocity of the two frames.

Through the Lorentz Transformation, we see that an object's velocity and the timing of events can appear differently depending on the observer's motion, but the physics remains consistent.
Relativistic Velocity Addition
Relativistic Velocity Addition is a formula used in Special Relativity to calculate how velocities add up when objects are moving at speeds close to that of light. It ensures that the resulting velocity never exceeds the speed of light, maintaining the constancy of light speed in all inertial reference frames.

Under classical, non-relativistic physics, if two objects are moving towards each other at velocities \(u\) and \(v\), their relative velocity is simply \(u + v\). However, in the realm of relativistic speeds, this simple addition does not hold.

The relativistic velocity addition formula is given by:
  • \[ u' = \frac{u - v}{1 - \frac{uv}{c^2}} \]
Here, \(u'\) is the velocity observed in the moving frame \(\mathcal{S'}\), and \(u\) is the velocity in the original frame \(\mathcal{S}\). This equation accounts for the time dilation and length contraction effects of relativistic speeds.

By using this formula, you maintain consistent physics across reference frames. For instance, if an object is moving with constant velocity \(u_0\) in one frame, the formula shows that \(u'\), the velocity in a different moving frame, is also constant, demonstrating the invariance of motion.
Inertial Frames
Inertial Frames are a key concept in both classical and modern physics. They refer to reference frames where an object either stays at rest or moves at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. Newton's First Law of Motion, which states that an isolated object will move at constant velocity in such frames, is grounded on this principle.

Inertial frames admit a simplification of physics laws because they do not accelerate, unlike non-inertial or accelerated frames, which require additional forces (like fictitious forces) to describe motion. The idea of inertial frames makes it easier to apply physics principles, especially when transitioning between different observers, like in problems involving special relativity.

Both the Lorentz Transformation and the Relativistic Velocity Addition rely on the concept of inertial frames to preserve consistent physics laws across different perspectives. They help ensure that Newton's First Law holds true even when observed from a frame moving at relativistic speeds. Whether viewed in frame \(\mathcal{S}\) or \(\mathcal{S'}\), an object's lack of acceleration and constant velocity remain invariant, maintaining the core aspect of Newton’s motion law across all inertial frames.

Thus, understanding inertial frames is crucial for grasping how motion and relativistic effects are observed in the vast universe.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider two events that occur at positions \(\mathbf{r}_{1}\) and \(\mathbf{r}_{2}\) and times \(t_{1}\) and \(t_{2} .\) Let \(\Delta \mathbf{r}=\mathbf{r}_{2}-\mathbf{r}_{1}\) and \(\Delta t=t_{2}-t_{1} .\) Write down the Lorentz transformation for \(\mathbf{r}_{1}\) and \(t_{1}\), and likewise for \(\mathbf{r}_{2}\) and \(t_{2},\) and deduce the transformation for \(\Delta \mathbf{r}\) and \(\Delta t\). Notice that differences \(\Delta \mathbf{r}\) and \(\Delta t\) transform in exactly the same way as \(\mathbf{r}\) and \(t\). This important property follows from the linearity of the Lorentz transformation.

(a) By exchanging \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\), write down the Lorentz transformation for a boost of velocity \(V\) along the \(x_{2}\) axis and the corresponding \(4 \times 4\) matrix \(\Lambda_{\mathrm{B} 2}\). ( \(\mathbf{b}\) ) Write down the \(4 \times 4\) matrices \(\Lambda_{\mathrm{R}+}\) and \(\Lambda_{\mathrm{R}-}\) that represent rotations of the \(x_{1} x_{2}\) plane through \(\pm \pi / 2,\) with the angle of rotation measured counterclockwise. (c) Verify that \(\Lambda_{\mathrm{B} 2}=\Lambda_{\mathrm{R}-} \Lambda_{\mathrm{B} 1} \Lambda_{\mathrm{R}+},\) where \(\Lambda_{\mathrm{B} 1}\) is the standard boost along the \(x_{1}\) axis, and interpret this result.

The pion \(\left(\pi^{+} \text {or } \pi^{-}\right)\) is an unstable particle that decays with a proper half-life of \(1.8 \times 10^{-8}\) s. (This is the half-life measured in the pion's rest frame.) (a) What is the pion's half-life measured in a frame \(\mathcal{S}\) where it is traveling at \(0.8 c ?\) (b). If 32,000 pions are created at the same place, all traveling at this same speed, how many will remain after they have traveled down an evacuated pipe of length \(d=36 \mathrm{m} ?\) Remember that after \(n\) half-lives, \(2^{-n}\) of the original particles survive. (c) What would the answer have been if you had ignored time dilation? (Naturally it is the answer (b) that agrees with experiment.)

A space explorer \(A\) sets off at a steady \(0.95 c\) to a distant star. After exploring the star for a short time, he returns at the same speed and gets home after a total absence of 80 years (as measured by earth-bound observers). How long do \(A\) 's clocks say that he was gone, and by how much has he aged as compared to his twin \(B\) who stayed behind on earth? [Note: This is the famous "twin paradox." It is fairly easy to get the right answer by judicious insertion of a factor of \(\gamma\) in the right place, but to understand it, you need to recognize that it involves three inertial frames: the earth-bound frame \(\mathcal{S}\), the frame \(\mathcal{S}^{\prime}\) of the outbound rocket, and the frame \(\mathcal{S}^{\prime \prime}\) of the returning rocket. Write down the time dilation formula for the two halves of the journey and then add. Notice that the experiment is not symmetrical between the two twins: \(A\) stays at rest in the single inertial frame \(\delta\), but \(B\) occupies at least two different frames. This is what allows the result to be unsymmetrical.]

One way to set up the system of synchronized clocks in a frame \(\mathcal{S}\), as described at the beginning of Section 15.4, would be for the chief observer to summon all her helpers to the origin \(O\) and synchronize their clocks there, and then have them travel to their assigned positions very slowly. Prove this claim as follows: Suppose a certain observer is assigned to a position \(P\) at a distance \(d\) from the origin. If he travels at constant speed \(V\), when he reaches \(P\) how much will his clock differ from the chief's clock at \(O\) ? Show that this difference approaches 0 as \(V \rightarrow 0\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free