Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a mass \(m\) moving in two dimensions, subject to a single force \(\mathbf{F}\) that is independent of r and \(t\). (a) Find the potential energy \(U(\mathbf{r})\) and the Hamiltonian \(\mathcal{H}\). (b) Show that if you use rectangular coordinates \(x, y\) with the \(x\) axis in the direction of \(\mathbf{F},\) then \(y\) is ignorable. (c) Show that if you use rectangular coordinates \(x, y\) with neither axis in the direction of \(\mathbf{F},\) then neither coordinate is ignorable. (Moral: Choose generalized coordinates carefully!)

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) \( U(\mathbf{r}) = Fx + C \); \( \mathcal{H} = \frac{1}{2}m(v_x^2 + v_y^2) + Fx + C \). (b) \( y \) is ignorable. (c) Neither \( x \) nor \( y \) is ignorable.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Force and Potential Energy

The potential energy, \( U(\mathbf{r}) \), is related to the force \( \mathbf{F} \) by the equation \( \mathbf{F} = -abla U(\mathbf{r}) \). Since \( \mathbf{F} \) is constant (independent of \( \mathbf{r} \) and \( t \)), it must take the form \( \mathbf{F} = -F\hat{x} \) in some direction (e.g., along the \( x \)-axis). The potential energy function that gives rise to this constant force is linear in the corresponding coordinate, hence \( U(\mathbf{r}) = Fx + C \).
02

Find the Hamiltonian

The Hamiltonian \( \mathcal{H} \) of a system is given by the sum of the kinetic and potential energies. The kinetic energy for a mass \( m \) moving in two dimensions can be expressed as \( T = \frac{1}{2}m(v_x^2 + v_y^2) \). Therefore, the Hamiltonian is: \[ \mathcal{H} = T + U = \frac{1}{2}m(v_x^2 + v_y^2) + Fx + C. \]
03

Show y is Ignorable (Aligned with Force)

If the \( x \)-axis is aligned with the force \( \mathbf{F} \), then the potential energy \( U \) depends only on \( x \), not on \( y \). Thus, the Hamiltonian \( \mathcal{H} = \frac{1}{2}m(v_x^2 + v_y^2) + Fx + C \) does not explicitly involve \( y \), making \( y \) an ignorable coordinate.
04

Show No Ignorable Coordinates (Not Aligned with Force)

If neither the \( x \)-axis nor the \( y \)-axis is aligned with \( \mathbf{F} \), the force could be expressed as \( F_x \) and \( F_y \) (i.e., \( \mathbf{F} = -F_x\hat{i} - F_y\hat{j} \)). Then, the potential energy \( U = F_x x + F_y y \) depends on both \( x \) and \( y \). Hence, the Hamiltonian \( \mathcal{H} = \frac{1}{2}m(v_x^2 + v_y^2) + F_x x + F_y y + C \) involves both coordinates, making neither \( x \) nor \( y \) ignorable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Potential Energy
Potential energy is an essential concept in studying Hamiltonian mechanics. It is a type of energy that is stored within a system due to its position or configuration. When a mass moves under the influence of a force that does not depend on time or the specific path taken, potential energy becomes especially important. For a force \( \mathbf{F} \), which is defined mathematically as \( \mathbf{F} = -abla U(\mathbf{r}) \), the change in potential energy is related to the work done by the force.

This relationship implies that the force \( \mathbf{F} \) is derived from a scalar potential function \( U(\mathbf{r}) \). If the force is constant as implied in our scenario and aligns along a single direction, the potential function \( U \) becomes linear with respect to that direction. In our problem, since the force is constant along the x-axis, the potential energy is expressed as \( U(x) = Fx + C \), where \( C \) is a constant. Here, only the x-coordinate contributes to the potential energy, simplifying many calculations in physics.

Understanding how forces relate to potential energy functions helps in predicting the movement and behavior of objects within a system. It is crucial in solving many physical problems, especially in conservative force fields where energy is conserved.
Force in Two Dimensions
When analyzing forces acting on a body in two dimensions, each force can be broken down into components along the x and y axes. This helps in simplifying the calculations and applying the principles of mechanics effectively.\(\mathbf{F} = -F \hat{i}\), assumes the simplest case where the force acts in one direction only, namely the x-direction.

If you do not align your coordinates along the force's direction, the components become \( F_x \) and \( F_y \). Thus, the system becomes slightly more complicated because the potential energy needs to be recalculated across both directions \(x\) and \(y\). It is expressed as \( U(x, y) = F_x x + F_y y \).

In an environment where neither axis aligns with the force direction, every point in space is influenced by components along both axes. This means both coordinates \(x\) and \(y\) are relevant for determining the dynamic behavior of the system. Such a setup is an effective way to understand how forces interact with bodies in more complex settings. Breaking down forces into two dimensions forms the basis for analyzing a variety of real-world problems.
Ignorable Coordinates
In Hamiltonian mechanics, an ignorable coordinate is a coordinate that does not explicitly appear in the calculation of potential energy or Hamiltonian of a system. This simplification occurs because changes along this coordinate do not affect the energy of the system. Hence, the equations of motion become easier as no dynamics are reflected along this dimension.

Consider the example from the exercise where \( y \) is ignorable. When the force is constant and aligned along the x-axis, the Hamiltonian, \( \mathcal{H} = \frac{1}{2}m(v_x^2 + v_y^2) + Fx + C \), does not involve the \( y \) coordinate. This is because the potential energy \( U \) only depends on \( x \), allowing \( y \) to be omitted from any changes in potential.
  • Benefits of Ignorable Coordinates: Simplifies analysis and reduces computational complexity.
  • When Ignorable Coordinates Arise: Occurs often when systems exhibit symmetries, such as uniform circular motion.
If neither coordinate axis aligns with the force, both must be considered, as effects from the force contribute to changes in both coordinates. Thus, understanding when and how coordinates can be ignored is crucial in simplifying and solving mechanical problems effectively.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A beam of particles is moving along an accelerator pipe in the \(z\) direction. The particles are uniformly distributed in a cylindrical volume of length \(L_{\mathrm{o}}\) (in the \(z\) direction) and radius \(R_{\mathrm{o}} .\) The particles have momenta uniformly distributed with \(p_{z}\) in an interval \(p_{\mathrm{o}} \pm \Delta p_{z}\) and the transverse momentum \(p_{\perp}\) inside a circle of radius \(\Delta p_{\perp} .\) To increase the particles' spatial density, the beam is focused by electric and magnetic fields, so that the radius shrinks to a smaller value \(R\). What does Liouville's theorem tell you about the spread in the transverse momentum \(p_{\perp}\) and the subsequent behavior of the radius \(R ?\) (Assume that the focusing does not affect either \(L_{\mathrm{o}}\) or \(\Delta p_{z}\).)

Find the Lagrangian, the generalized momenta, and the Hamiltonian for a free particle (no forces at all) moving in three dimensions. (Use \(x, y, z\) as your generalized coordinates.) Find and solve Hamilton's equations.

The simple form \(\mathcal{H}=T+U\) is true only if your generalized coordinates are "natural" (relation betweeen generalized and underlying Cartesian coordinates is independent of time). If the generalized coordinates are not "natural," you must use the definition \(\mathcal{H}=\sum p_{i} \dot{q}_{i}-\mathcal{L} .\) To illustrate this point, consider the following: Two children are playing catch inside a railroad car that is moving with varying speed \(V\) along a straight horizontal track. For generalized coordinates you can use the position \((x, y, z)\) of the ball relative to a point fixed in the car, but in setting up the Hamiltonian you must use coordinates in an inertial frame \(-\) a frame fixed to the ground. Find the Hamiltonian for the ball and show that it is not equal to \(T+U\) (neither as measured in the car, nor as measured in the ground-based frame).

The general proof of the divergence theorem $$\int_{S} \mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{v} d A=\int_{V} \nabla \cdot \mathbf{v} d V$$ is fairly complicated and not especially illuminating. However, there are a few special cases where it is reasonably simple and quite instructive. Here is one: Consider a rectangular region bounded by the six planes \(x=X\) and \(X+A, y=Y\) and \(Y+B,\) and \(z=Z\) and \(Z+C,\) with total volume \(V=A B C .\) The surface \(S\) of this region is made up of six rectangles that we can call \(S_{1}\) (in the plane \(x=X\) ), \(S_{2}\) (in the plane \(x=X+A\) ), and so on. The surface integral on the left of (13.63) is then the sum of six integrals, one over each of the rectangles \(S_{1}, S_{2},\) and so forth. (a) Consider the first two of these integrals and show that $$ \int_{S_{1}} \mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{v} d A+\int_{S_{2}} \mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{v} d A=\int_{Y}^{Y+B} d y \int_{Z}^{Z+C} d z\left[v_{x}(X+A, y, z)-v_{x}(X, y, z)\right] $$ (b) Show that the integrand on the right can be rewritten as an integral of \(\partial v_{x} / \partial x\) over \(x\) running from \(x=X\) to \(x=X+A .(\text { c) Substitute the result of part }(b)\) into part (a), and write down the corresponding results for the two remaining pairs of faces. Add these results to prove the divergence theorem (13.63).

13.13 \star\star Consider a particle of mass \(m\) constrained to move on a frictionless cylinder of radius \(R\), given by the equation \(\rho=R\) in cylindrical polar coordinates \((\rho, \phi, z) .\) The mass is subject to just one external force, \(\mathbf{F}=-k r \hat{\mathbf{r}},\) where \(k\) is a positive constant, \(r\) is its distance from the origin, and \(\hat{\mathbf{r}}\) is the unit vector pointing away from the origin, as usual. Using \(z\) and \(\phi\) as generalized coordinates, find the Hamiltonian \(\mathcal{H}\). Write down and solve Hamilton's equations and describe the motion.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free