Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a rigid plane body or "lamina," such as a flat piece of sheet metal, rotating about a point \(O\) in the body. If we choose axes so that the lamina lies in the \(x y\) plane, which elements of the inertia tensor \(\mathbf{I}\) are automatically zero? Prove that \(I_{z z}=I_{x x}+I_{y y}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The zero elements are \(I_{xz}, I_{zx}, I_{yz}, \) and \(I_{zy}\). We proved \(I_{zz} = I_{xx} + I_{yy}\).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to determine which elements of the inertia tensor \(\mathbf{I}\) are zero for a rigid plane body (lamina) lying in the \(xy\) plane. Additionally, we must prove that the diagonal element \(I_{zz}\) is equal to \(I_{xx} + I_{yy}\).
02

Identifying Zero Elements of the Inertia Tensor

For a lamina in the \(xy\) plane, the mass is distributed along these two axes, meaning there is no mass in the \(z\)-axis direction. Thus, any moments of inertia involving the \(z\)-axis with \(x\) or \(y\) will be zero. Therefore, \(I_{xz} = I_{zx} = I_{yz} = I_{zy} = 0\).
03

Expression of the Inertia Tensor Elements

In addition to zero elements identified earlier, the inertia tensor has the form: \[\mathbf{I} = \begin{bmatrix}I_{xx} & I_{xy} & 0 \I_{yx} & I_{yy} & 0 \0 & 0 & I_{zz} \\end{bmatrix}.\] Due to symmetry and the properties of the inertia tensor, \(I_{xy} = I_{yx}\).
04

Relating Inertia Tensor Elements to Mass Distribution

For the lamina, the sum of the diagonal entries, also known as the trace of the tensor, gives the same information as the sum of masses around the principal axes. Since no mass lies along the \(z\)-axis (the normal to the lamina), the inertia associated with \(I_{zz}\):\[ I_{zz} = I_{xx} + I_{yy}. \] This relationship is due to how inertia distributes in a plane perpendicular to the axis through the point \(O\).
05

Cross-Verify the Relationship

Since the trace of the inertia tensor should be invariant, consider a coordinate rotation to verify that the total inertia for any axis perpendicular to the plane sums to the trace. Thus, the inertia associated by the plane along \(z\)-axis (normal to the plane) is the sum of \(I_{xx}\) and \(I_{yy}\).
06

Solution Conclusion

Thus, we conclude that the zero elements of the inertia tensor \(\mathbf{I}\) for a lamina in the \(xy\) plane are \(I_{xz}, I_{zx}, I_{yz}, I_{zy}\), and we have shown that \(I_{zz} = I_{xx} + I_{yy}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Rigid Body Mechanics
Rigid body mechanics is a branch of classical mechanics dealing with the behavior of solid objects that don’t deform when forces are applied. This assumption makes analysis simpler since it disregards factors like stress and strain that affect more pliable bodies.
In the context of our exercise, it’s essential as it allows us to consider the geometric and inertial properties of objects such as laminas, which are infinitely thin layers. These objects can be represented in fixed, unchanging shapes, making calculations straightforward.
Since the assumptions hold that distances between any two points in the rigid body always remain constant, we can easily define properties like the center of mass and moment of inertia. For analyzing rotation dynamics, a rigid body is particularly suitable due to these simplifications, facilitating the determination of the inertia tensor.
Moment of Inertia
The moment of inertia is a fundamental concept in the description of rotating bodies. It measures an object's resistance to changes in its angular velocity. For a simple analogy, think of it as the rotational equivalent of mass in linear motion.
In mathematical terms, it’s often represented by the inertia tensor, which is particularly useful for complex bodies. Each element in the tensor reflects mass distribution relative to specific axes of rotation.
  • The higher the moment of inertia, the harder it is to change the rotation of the body about that particular axis.
  • In our scenario, where the body lies in the xy-plane, the inertia tensor simplifies as there are no components related to the z-axis.

Understanding the reduction of some tensor elements to zero, as derivable from the symmetry and mass disposition in our exercise, is key to analyzing plane bodies.
Lamina
A lamina refers to a thin, flat plane body with a simple geometric shape, like a sheet of metal or paper.
  • Because it is two-dimensional and lies in the xy-plane, it does not extend into the third dimension, the z-axis.
  • This reduces the complexity of its inertia tensor, assuming uniform thickness and material distribution.

Such objects are traditionally easy to work with due to their simplified mass distribution, focusing only on the plane they occupy. Knowing that the z-axis influence is negligible helps capitalize on symmetry properties while working with calculations such as inertia tensors. In the context of our exercise, the zero elements of the inertia tensor reflect this lack of mass distribution in the z-direction.
Plane Body
A plane body in physics refers to an object that occupies a flat two-dimensional surface. These bodies, like a lamina, are strictly confined within a plane, most commonly the xy-plane.
For any plane body, defining mass distribution becomes straightforward since it primarily concerns only two dimensions.
This simplicity translates to practical advantages in calculation, especially when dealing with inertia tensors or rotational dynamics.
  • Such simplification allows for evaluating rotational inertia without concern for out-of-plane components.
  • The horizontal orientation ensures properties related to the normal axis, which doesn’t feature any mass from the body extending into it, showcasing the advantages when evaluating the inertia tensor.

The ease with which properties like mass moment location and rotation resistance can be assessed underpins why plane bodies are a fundamental study element in rigid body mechanics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that you have found three independent principal axes (directions \(\mathbf{e}_{1}, \mathbf{e}_{2}, \mathbf{e}_{3}\) ) and corresponding principal moments \(\lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}, \lambda_{3}\) of a rigid body whose moment of inertia tensor \(\mathbf{I}\) (not diagonal) you had calculated. (You may assume, what is actually fairly easy to prove, that all of the quantities concerned are real.) (a) Prove that if \(\lambda_{i} \neq \lambda_{j}\) then it is automatically the case that \(\mathbf{e}_{i} \cdot \mathbf{e}_{j}=0\) (It may help to introduce a notation that distinguishes between vectors and matrices. For example, you could use an underline to indicate a matrix, so that \(\underline{\mathbf{a}}\) is the \(3 \times 1\) matrix that represents the vector a, and the vector scalar product a \(\cdot \mathbf{b}\) is the same as the matrix product \(\tilde{\mathbf{a}} \mathbf{b}\) or \(\underline{\mathbf{b}}\) a. Then consider the number \(\tilde{\mathbf{e}}_{i} \mathbf{I} \mathbf{e}_{j},\) which can be evaluated in two ways using the fact that both \(\mathbf{e}_{i}\) and \(\mathbf{e}_{j}\) are eigenvectors of I.) (b) Use the result of part (a) to show that if the three principal moments are all different, then the directions of three principal axes are uniquely determined. (c) Prove that if two of the principal moments are equal, \(\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}\) say, then any direction in the plane of \(\mathbf{e}_{1}\) and \(\mathbf{e}_{2}\) is also a principal axis with the same principal moment. In other words, when \(\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}\) the corresponding principal axes are not uniquely determined. (d) Prove that if all three principal moments are equal, then any axis is a principal axis with the same principal moment.

(a) A thin uniform rod of mass \(M\) and length \(L\) lies on the \(x\) axis with one end at the origin. Find its moment of inertia for rotation about the \(z\) axis. [Here the sum of (10.25) must be replaced by an integral of the form \(\int x^{2} \mu d x\) where \(\mu\) is the linear mass density, mass/length.] (b) What if the rod's center is at the origin?

Show that the inertia tensor is additive, in this sense: Suppose a body \(A\) is made up of two parts \(B\) and \(C\). (For instance, a hammer is made up of a wooden handle wedged into a metal head.) Then \(\mathbf{I}_{A}=\mathbf{I}_{B}+\mathbf{I}_{C} .\) Similarly, if \(A\) can be thought of as the result of removing \(C\) from \(B\) (as a hollow spherical shell is the result of removing a small sphere from inside a larger sphere), then \(\mathbf{I}_{A}=\mathbf{I}_{B}-\mathbf{I}_{C}\).

A thin, flat, uniform metal triangle lies in the \(x y\) plane with its corners at \((1,0,0),(0,1,0),\) and the origin. Its surface density (mass/area) is \(\sigma=24\). (Distances and masses are measured in unspecified units, and the number 24 was chosen to make the answer come out nicely.) (a) Find the triangle's inertia tensor I. (b) What are its principal moments and the corresponding axes?

To illustrate the result (10.18), that the total KE of a body is just the rotational KE relative to any point that is instantaneously at rest, do the following: Write down the KE of a uniform wheel (mass M) rolling with speed \(v\) along a flat road, as the sum of the energies of the CM motion and the rotation about the CM. Now write it as the energy of the rotation about the instantaneous point of contact with the road and show that you get the same answer. (The energy of rotation is \(\frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2} .\) The moment of inertia of a uniform wheel about its center is \(I=\frac{1}{2} M R^{2} .\) That about a point on the rim is \(I^{\prime}=\frac{3}{2} M R^{2}\).)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free