Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) A thin uniform rod of mass \(M\) and length \(L\) lies on the \(x\) axis with one end at the origin. Find its moment of inertia for rotation about the \(z\) axis. [Here the sum of (10.25) must be replaced by an integral of the form \(\int x^{2} \mu d x\) where \(\mu\) is the linear mass density, mass/length.] (b) What if the rod's center is at the origin?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) \( \frac{ML^2}{3} \); (b) \( \frac{ML^2}{12} \).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We need to calculate the moment of inertia of a thin rod about the z-axis in two scenarios. First, with one end at the origin, and second, with the rod's center at the origin.
02

Set Up the Integral for Case (a)

For a rod extending from 0 to L, the linear mass density is given by \( \mu = \frac{M}{L} \). The element's mass, \( dm \), is \( \mu \cdot dx \). We use the formula for moment of inertia: \[ I = \int x^2 dm = \int x^2 \mu \, dx \] Substitute \( \mu \) to get \[ I = \frac{M}{L} \int_{0}^{L} x^2 \, dx \].
03

Solve the Integral for Case (a)

Evaluate the integral:\[ I = \frac{M}{L} \left[ \frac{x^3}{3} \right]_{0}^{L} = \frac{M}{L} \cdot \frac{L^3}{3} = \frac{ML^2}{3} \].Thus, the moment of inertia of the rod with one end at the origin is \( \frac{ML^2}{3} \).
04

Set Up for Case (b)

Now, consider the rod's center at the origin. The rod extends from \(-\frac{L}{2}\) to \(\frac{L}{2}\). The integral becomes:\[ I = \frac{M}{L} \int_{-\frac{L}{2}}^{\frac{L}{2}} x^2 \, dx \].
05

Solve the Integral for Case (b)

Evaluate the integral:\[ I = \frac{M}{L} \left[ \frac{x^3}{3} \right]_{-\frac{L}{2}}^{\frac{L}{2}} = \frac{M}{L} \left[ \frac{(\frac{L}{2})^3}{3} - \frac{(-\frac{L}{2})^3}{3} \right] = \frac{M}{L} \cdot \frac{L^3}{12} \cdot 2 = \frac{ML^2}{12} \cdot 2 = \frac{ML^2}{6} \].Thus, the moment of inertia of the rod with its center at the origin is \( \frac{ML^2}{12} \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Mass Density
Linear mass density is a way to describe how mass is distributed along a rod. Imagine stretching a rod along the x-axis, where its mass seems evenly spread across its length. The concept of linear mass density, \( \mu \), will help us understand how to calculate properties like moment of inertia for such objects.

A uniform rod—one with the same thickness and material throughout—has a constant linear mass density. It is defined by the formula:
  • \( \mu = \frac{M}{L} \)
where \( M \) is the total mass of the rod and \( L \) is its length.

Knowing \( \mu \) allows us to find the mass of any small segment of the rod. For a tiny piece of length \( dx \), located at position \( x \), the mass \( dm \) is given by:

\[ dm = \mu \cdot dx \]

This calculation is pivotal in setting up the integral used in finding the moment of inertia, as each little piece \( dm \) contributes a small amount to the total inertia.
Integral Calculus
Integral calculus is a mathematical tool that helps us sum an infinite number of tiny parts to find a whole. When measuring the moment of inertia, we integrate the squared distance of each tiny mass segment from the axis of rotation, reflected in its use within our solution.

The formula we use is:

\[ I = \int x^2 dm \]

This integral takes every small part of the rod, represented by \( dm \), and multiplies it by the square of its distance \( x^2 \) from the rotation axis. This operation tells us how much each part "contributes" to the rotational inertia.

To solve for \( I \) through calculus, we transform it using the linear mass density, converting \( dm \) into \( \mu \, dx \). Our integral setup for case (a) involves multiplying the density \( \mu \) with \( x^2 \) and integrating over the rod's length, from 0 to \( L \). The complete form integrates all small sections of the rod, combining them to give a final inertia value.
Rotation About an Axis
When calculating the moment of inertia, it's crucial to understand the axis of rotation. In physics, the axis of rotation is an imaginary line around which an object turns. For this problem, we consider the rod turning about the z-axis.

A change in the rod's position relative to this axis changes how we calculate the moment of inertia. If the rod is anchored at one end, as in case (a), our integration bounds span from 0 to \( L \). However, when the center of the rod is placed over the origin, as in case (b), the rotation affects parts of the rod equally left and right from this axis.

In this situation, our new limits of integration become \(-\frac{L}{2}\) to \(\frac{L}{2}\). This change correctly accounts for the symmetrical distance contributing to the inertia. The moment of inertia values demonstrate how the distribution and position relative to the axis significantly impact the rotational dynamics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find the inertia tensor for a uniform, thin hollow cone, such as an ice-cream cone, of mass \(M,\) height \(h,\) and base radius \(R,\) spinning about its pointed end.

Five equal point masses are placed at the five corners of a square pyramid whose square base is centered on the origin in the \(x y\) plane, with side \(L,\) and whose apex is on the \(z\) axis at a height \(H\) above the origin. Find the CM of the five-mass system.

Consider an arbitrary rigid body with an axis of rotational symmetry, which we'll call \(\hat{\mathbf{z}}\). (a) Prove that the axis of symmetry is a principal axis. (b) Prove that any two directions \(\hat{\mathbf{x}}\) and \(\hat{\mathbf{y}}\) perpendicular to \(\hat{\mathbf{z}}\) and each other are also principal axes. (c) Prove that the principal moments corresponding to these two axes are equal: \(\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}\).

An axially symmetric space station (principal axis \(\mathbf{e}_{3},\) and \(\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}\) ) is floating in free space. It has rockets mounted symmetrically on either side that are firing and exert a constant torque \(\Gamma\) about the symmetry axis. Solve Euler's equations exactly for \(\omega\) (relative to the body axis) and describe the motion. At \(t=0\) take \(\omega=\left(\omega_{10}, 0, \omega_{30}\right)\)

Suppose that you have found three independent principal axes (directions \(\mathbf{e}_{1}, \mathbf{e}_{2}, \mathbf{e}_{3}\) ) and corresponding principal moments \(\lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}, \lambda_{3}\) of a rigid body whose moment of inertia tensor \(\mathbf{I}\) (not diagonal) you had calculated. (You may assume, what is actually fairly easy to prove, that all of the quantities concerned are real.) (a) Prove that if \(\lambda_{i} \neq \lambda_{j}\) then it is automatically the case that \(\mathbf{e}_{i} \cdot \mathbf{e}_{j}=0\) (It may help to introduce a notation that distinguishes between vectors and matrices. For example, you could use an underline to indicate a matrix, so that \(\underline{\mathbf{a}}\) is the \(3 \times 1\) matrix that represents the vector a, and the vector scalar product a \(\cdot \mathbf{b}\) is the same as the matrix product \(\tilde{\mathbf{a}} \mathbf{b}\) or \(\underline{\mathbf{b}}\) a. Then consider the number \(\tilde{\mathbf{e}}_{i} \mathbf{I} \mathbf{e}_{j},\) which can be evaluated in two ways using the fact that both \(\mathbf{e}_{i}\) and \(\mathbf{e}_{j}\) are eigenvectors of I.) (b) Use the result of part (a) to show that if the three principal moments are all different, then the directions of three principal axes are uniquely determined. (c) Prove that if two of the principal moments are equal, \(\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}\) say, then any direction in the plane of \(\mathbf{e}_{1}\) and \(\mathbf{e}_{2}\) is also a principal axis with the same principal moment. In other words, when \(\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}\) the corresponding principal axes are not uniquely determined. (d) Prove that if all three principal moments are equal, then any axis is a principal axis with the same principal moment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free