Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a system of two Einstein solids, Aand B, each containing 10 oscillators, sharing a total of 20units of energy. Assume that the solids are weakly coupled, and that the total energy is fixed.

(a) How many different macro states are available to this system?

(b) How many different microstates are available to this system?

(c) Assuming that this system is in thermal equilibrium, what is the probability of finding all the energy in solid A?

(d) What is the probability of finding exactly half of the energy in solid A?

(e) Under what circumstances would this system exhibit irreversible behavior?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) The macro states are available to the current system is 21macrostates

b) The micro states are available to the present system is Ωoverall=6.892×1010

c) The probability of finding all the energy in solid A is P=1.453×10-4

d) The probability of finding exactly half of the energy in solid A is P=0.1238

Step by step solution

01

macro and micro states (a) and (b)

Assume they're two Einstein physics structures, Aand B, with NA=NB=10and qA+qB=20..

(a) As a metric, the count of macro states is:

q+1=20+1=21

because we began with 0 and switch our attention resolute 20.

(b) The formula for said length of microstates is:

ΩoverallNoverall,qoverall=qoverall+Noverall1qoverall=qoverall+Noverall1!qoverall!Noverall1!

qoverall=qA+qB=20,

Noverall=NA+NB

Ωoverall=20+20120

=(20+201)!20!(201)!

=6.892×1010

Ωoverall=6.892×1010

02

Equilibrium (c)

(c)The likelihood that while in equilibrium state, most of the facility is in rigid A, resulted in:

qA=20qB=0NA=10NB=10

The cumulative number is calculated based:

Ωtotal=ΩAΩB

ΩA=qA+NA1qA=qA+NA1!qA!NA1!

ΩA=20+10120=(20+101)!20!(101)!=10015005

ΩB=qB+NB1qB=qB+NB1!qB3!NB1!

ΩB=0+1010=(0+101)!0!(101)!=1

Ωtotal=ΩAΩB=10015005×1=10015005

As an answer, this same chances inside this instance is:

localid="1650298575703" P=ΩtotalΩoverall

localid="1650298609352" =100150056.892×1010

localid="1650298489904" =1.453×104

03

Evenly Distributed (d)

(d)The likelihood that while in equilibrium state, most of the power is in rigid , resulted in:

qA=10qB=10NA=10NB=10

The cumulative number is calculated based:

Ωtotal=ΩAΩB

localid="1650382124449" ΩA=qA+NA1qA=qA+NA1!qA!NA1!

ΩA=20+10120=(10+101)!10!(101)!=92378

ΩB=qB+NB1qB=qB+NB1!qB3!NB1!

ΩB=0+1010=(10+101)!10!(101)!=92378

As a solution, this same chances inside this instance is:

P=ΩtotalΩoverall

=8.5337×1096.892×1010

=0.1238

04

Equally Distributed (e)

(e) it'll be more likely that it photon energy will spread them divided between the 2 solids, and when that does, it's rare that its position will revert about one solid having similar more quanta than others. That is, an irreversible state is that the one where the quanta are spaced equally.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that during the quasistatic isothermal expansion of a monatomic ideal gas, the change in entropy is related to the heat input Qby the simple formula

s=QT

In the following chapter I'll prove that this formula is valid for any quasistatic process. Show, however, that it is not valid for the free expansion process described above.

According to the Sackur-Tetrode equation, the entropy of a monatomic ideal gas can become negative when its temperature (and hence its energy) is sufficiently low. Of course this is absurd, so the Sackur-Tetrode equation must be invalid at very low temperatures. Suppose you start with a sample of helium at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, then lower the temperature holding the density fixed. Pretend that the helium remains a gas and does not liquefy. Below what temperature would the Sackur-Tetrode equation predict that Sis negative? (The behavior of gases at very low temperatures is the main subject of Chapter 7.)

How many possible arrangements are there for a deck of 52playing cards? (For simplicity, consider only the order of the cards, not whether they are turned upside-down, etc.) Suppose you start w e in the process? Express your answer both as a pure number (neglecting the factor of k) and in SI units. Is this entropy significant compared to the entropy associated with arranging thermal energy among the molecules in the cards?

A black hole is a region of space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape. Throwing something into a black hole is therefore an irreversible process, at least in the everyday sense of the word. In fact, it is irreversible in the thermodynamic sense as well: Adding mass to a black hole increases the black hole's entropy. It turns out that there's no way to tell (at least from outside) what kind of matter has gone into making a black hole. Therefore, the entropy of a black hole must be greater than the entropy of any conceivable type of matter that could have been used to create it. Knowing this, it's not hard to estimate the entropy of a black hole.
aUse dimensional analysis to show that a black hole of mass Mshould have a radius of order GM/c2, where Gis Newton's gravitational constant and cis the speed of light. Calculate the approximate radius of a one-solar-mass black holeM=2×1030kg .
bIn the spirit of Problem 2.36, explain why the entropy of a black hole, in fundamental units, should be of the order of the maximum number of particles that could have been used to make it.

cTo make a black hole out of the maximum possible number of particles, you should use particles with the lowest possible energy: long-wavelength photons (or other massless particles). But the wavelength can't be any longer than the size of the black hole. By setting the total energy of the photons equal toMc2 , estimate the maximum number of photons that could be used to make a black hole of mass M. Aside from a factor of 8π2, your result should agree with the exact formula for the entropy of a black hole, obtained* through a much more difficult calculation:

Sb.h.=8π2GM2hck

d Calculate the entropy of a one-solar-mass black hole, and comment on the result.

Problem 2.20. Suppose you were to shrink Figure2.7until the entire horizontal scale fits on the page. How wide would the peak be?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free