Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a system of two Einstein solids, with N{A} = 300, N{B} = 200 and q{total} = 100 (as discussed in Section 2.3). Compute the entropy of the most likely macrostate and of the least likely macrostate. Also compute the entropy over long time scales, assuming that all microstates are accessible. (Neglect the factor of Boltzmann's constant in the definition of entropy; for systems this small it is best to think of entropy as a pure number.) 65

Short Answer

Expert verified

The macrostate is

  1. For the most likely macrostate: S = 264.2
  2. For the least likely macrostate: S = 187.52
  3. For the most likely macrostateS=267

Step by step solution

01

Step :1 Expression of Einstein solids

Consider two Einstein solids with NA=300, NB= 200 and q = 100 .

The most likely macrostate will see the energy divided proportionately between the two solids,

so qA=60 and qB=40 .

The multiplicity of this macrostate is give by:

Ω=ΩAΩB

where,ΩA=qA+NA1qAΩA=qA+NA1qA

The multiplicity of this macrostate is therefore:

Ω=qA+NA1qAqA+NA1qAΩ=qA+NA1!qA!NA1!qB+NB1!qB!NB1!

substitute with

NA=300,NB=200,qA=60andqB=40,so:

Ω=(60+3001)!60!(3001)!(40+2001)!40!(2001)!=6.866×10114S=lnΩ=ln6.866×10114=264.42

02

Step :2 Expression of solve 

  • The least likely macrostate would find all the energy in the smaller solid, so that qA= 0 and qB=100. In that case:

Ω=qA+NA1!qA!NA1!qB+NB1!qB!NB1!=(299)!100!(199)!Ω=2.772×1081S=lnΩ=ln2.772×1081=187.52

  • Over long time scales, the interaction between the solids mean that all microstates are accessible. In this case the multiplicity is:

Ω=qA+qB+NA+NB1qA+qB=599100Ω=9.262×10115S=lnΩ=ln9.262×10115=267

  • Thus the most probable state with the solids divided has almost as much entropy as when the whole system is a single state. In most calculators, these binomial coefficients are non calculable, so you can use the following python code to calculate these cofficients.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use Stirling's approximation to find an approximate formula for the multiplicity of a two-state paramagnet. Simplify this formula in the limit NNto obtain ΩNe/NN. This result should look very similar to your answer to Problem 2.17; explain why these two systems, in the limits considered, are essentially the same.

Use a computer to plot formula 2.22directly, as follows. Define z=q_{A}/q, so that (1-z)=q_{B}/q. Then, aside from an overall constant that we'll ignore, the multiplicity function is [4z(1-z)]N, where zranges from 0to1and the factor of 4ensures that the height of the peak is equal to 1for any N. Plot this function forN=1,10,100,1000, and 10,000. Observe how the width of the peak decreases asNincreases.

Fun with logarithms.
a Simplify the expressionealnb. (That is, write it in a way that doesn't involve logarithms.)
b Assuming that b<<a, prove that ln(a+b)(lna)+(b/a). (Hint: Factor out the afrom the argument of the logarithm, so that you can apply the approximation of part d of the previous problem.)

Rather than insisting that all the molecules be in the left half of a container, suppose we only require that they be in the leftmost 99%(leaving the remaining 1%completely empty). What is the probability of finding such an arrangement if there are 100molecules in the container? What if there are 10,000molecules? What if there are 1023?

A black hole is a region of space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape. Throwing something into a black hole is therefore an irreversible process, at least in the everyday sense of the word. In fact, it is irreversible in the thermodynamic sense as well: Adding mass to a black hole increases the black hole's entropy. It turns out that there's no way to tell (at least from outside) what kind of matter has gone into making a black hole. Therefore, the entropy of a black hole must be greater than the entropy of any conceivable type of matter that could have been used to create it. Knowing this, it's not hard to estimate the entropy of a black hole.
aUse dimensional analysis to show that a black hole of mass Mshould have a radius of order GM/c2, where Gis Newton's gravitational constant and cis the speed of light. Calculate the approximate radius of a one-solar-mass black holeM=2×1030kg .
bIn the spirit of Problem 2.36, explain why the entropy of a black hole, in fundamental units, should be of the order of the maximum number of particles that could have been used to make it.

cTo make a black hole out of the maximum possible number of particles, you should use particles with the lowest possible energy: long-wavelength photons (or other massless particles). But the wavelength can't be any longer than the size of the black hole. By setting the total energy of the photons equal toMc2 , estimate the maximum number of photons that could be used to make a black hole of mass M. Aside from a factor of 8π2, your result should agree with the exact formula for the entropy of a black hole, obtained* through a much more difficult calculation:

Sb.h.=8π2GM2hck

d Calculate the entropy of a one-solar-mass black hole, and comment on the result.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free