Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Rather than insisting that all the molecules be in the left half of a container, suppose we only require that they be in the leftmost 99%(leaving the remaining 1%completely empty). What is the probability of finding such an arrangement if there are 100molecules in the container? What if there are 10,000molecules? What if there are 1023?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  • The expression of molecules is

Step by step solution

01

The statistical mechanics 

The number of microstates available to an Nmolecule 3-dideal gas with energy Ucontained in volume Vis approximately:

Ω=VNN!h3Nπ3N23N2!(2mU)3N2

Separating out the factors that depend only on N, we can write this as:

where, Ω(U,V,N)=f(N)VNU3N2f(N)=(2πm)3N23N2!N!h3N

Since one of the assumptions of statistical mechanics is that all microstates are equally probable, it should be possible, just by change, to find that even if a gas has a total volume V available to it, sometimes all the molecules will clump up in some smaller portion of the volume, leaving the remaining space empty (a vacuum). How likely is this to happen?

02

Step :2 The probability of spontaneous

Effectively, what we're asking is how likely is it that the volume occupied by the gas will spontaneously reduce from Vto aV, where0<a<1. Since the volume is all that changes (both Nand Uare unchanged), we can look at formula (1)and find that reducing the volume reduces multiplicity to:

Ω(U,V,N)=f(N)(aV)NU3N2

Thus the probability that this will happen spontaneously is :

substitute equation (1), localid="1650265451996" P(a)=Ω(a)ΩP(a)=(aV)N(V)N=aN

03

Step :3 Expression of equation 

Since Nis a large number, even a value of a close to 1is still very unlikely. For example, if a=0.99we find:

For N=100:

P(0.99)=0.99100=0.366

For N=10000:

P(0.99)=0.9910000=2.248×10-44

ForN=1023:

P(0.99)=0.9910230.991023=10-x

take the natural logarithm for both sides:

localid="1650267033492" 1023ln(0.99)=-xln(10)-0.01×1023=-x×2.3x=4.348×1020

the probability is therefore:

P(0.99)=10-4.348×1020

04

Step :4 Draw the sketch 

In fact, even for only 100molecules, the chance of the gas crowding into a smaller volume is virtually zero for a<0.95as we can see from a plot:

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How many possible arrangements are there for a deck of 52playing cards? (For simplicity, consider only the order of the cards, not whether they are turned upside-down, etc.) Suppose you start w e in the process? Express your answer both as a pure number (neglecting the factor of k) and in SI units. Is this entropy significant compared to the entropy associated with arranging thermal energy among the molecules in the cards?

For an Einstein solid with each of the following values of N and q , list all of the possible microstates, count them, and verify formula Ω(N,q)=q+N1q=(q+N1)!q!(N1)!

(a) N=3,q=4

(b)N=3,q=5

(c) N=3,q=6

(d) N=4,q=2

(e) N=4,q=3

(f) N=1,q=anything

(g) N= anything, q=1

Consider a system of two Einstein solids, with N{A} = 300, N{B} = 200 and q{total} = 100 (as discussed in Section 2.3). Compute the entropy of the most likely macrostate and of the least likely macrostate. Also compute the entropy over long time scales, assuming that all microstates are accessible. (Neglect the factor of Boltzmann's constant in the definition of entropy; for systems this small it is best to think of entropy as a pure number.) 65

For a single large two-state paramagnet, the multiplicity function is very sharply peaked about N=N/2.

(a) Use Stirling's approximation to estimate the height of the peak in the multiplicity function.

(b) Use the methods of this section to derive a formula for the multiplicity function in the vicinity of the peak, in terms of xN(N/2). Check that your formula agrees with your answer to part (a) when x=0.

(c) How wide is the peak in the multiplicity function?

(d) Suppose you flip 1,000,000coins. Would you be surprised to obtain heads and 499,000 tails? Would you be surprised to obtain 510,000 heads and 490,000 tails? Explain.

Show that during the quasistatic isothermal expansion of a monatomic ideal gas, the change in entropy is related to the heat input Qby the simple formula

s=QT

In the following chapter I'll prove that this formula is valid for any quasistatic process. Show, however, that it is not valid for the free expansion process described above.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free