Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For a single large two-state paramagnet, the multiplicity function is very sharply peaked about N=N/2.

(a) Use Stirling's approximation to estimate the height of the peak in the multiplicity function.

(b) Use the methods of this section to derive a formula for the multiplicity function in the vicinity of the peak, in terms of xN(N/2). Check that your formula agrees with your answer to part (a) when x=0.

(c) How wide is the peak in the multiplicity function?

(d) Suppose you flip 1,000,000coins. Would you be surprised to obtain heads and 499,000 tails? Would you be surprised to obtain 510,000 heads and 490,000 tails? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) The peak of the height within the multiplicity function Ωmax2N

b) The multiplicity function within the vicinity of the height, ΩΩmaxe2x2N

c) The height within the multiplicity function is w=2N

d) While a results of 501,000 individuals falls just ahead of the apex, this isn't very astonishing. A conclusion of 510,000 heads, from the opposite hand , is significantly outside the high and would are unusual.

Step by step solution

01

Microstates Quantity (a)

(a) Assume we get a paramagnet has N magnets, and shut to half them are as in spin-up state, giving in N=12N,, where Nby signifies the energy units. This method provides quantity of microstates:

Ωmax=N+N+1N=N2+N2+1N2

when N is solely an honest

ΩmaxNN2=N!N2!N2!

For such design variables, we'll employ Stirling's approximation:

n!2πnnnen

Ωmax2πNNNeN2πN2N2N2eN22

Ωmax2πNNNeN2πN2N2NeN

Ωmax2πNNNπNN2N

Ωmax2πN2NπN

Ωmax2N+12πN

Ωmax2N+12πN

Ωmax2N

02

Vicinity of the height   (b) 

b) We derive its multitude solution within the location of the crest, let:

x=NN2N=N2+x

x=NNN2N=N2x

Therefore, while the subsequent is accurate:

Ω=N+N+1N=N2+x+N2x+1N2xN2x

ΩN2x=N!N2x!N2+x!

As a conclusion, the redundancy think about units of xis:

Ω2πNNNeN2πN2xN2xN2xeN2x2πN2+xN2+xN2+xeN2+x

eNwith eN2+xeN2x

Ω2πNNN2πN2xN2xN2x2πN2+xN2+xN2+x

2πN2+x×2πN2x=2πN22x2

03

Equation

Ω2πNNN2πN22x2N2xN2xN2+xN2+x

Ω2πNNN2πN22x2N2xN2N2xxN2+xN2N2+xx

N2+xN2N2xN2=N22x2N2

Ω2πNNN2πN22x2N22x2N2N2xxN2+xx

ΩNNN2πN22x2N2+12N2xxN2+xx

We also may function of notation and handle massive Napplications without feeling worried concerning square root values. As a basis, here's a conservative calculation:

ΩNNN22x2N2N2xxN2+xx

both on sides, have used the expectation andtake care of ln(ab)=ln(a)+ln(b)andlnab=ln(a)ln(b)

ln(Ω)lnNNlnN22x2π2lnN2+xxlnN2xx

ln(Ω)Nln(N)N2lnN22x2xlnN2+x+xlnN2x

N2lnN22x2=N2lnN2212xN2

N2lnN22x2=N22lnN2+ln12xN2

04

Remaining Equation

ln(1+x)=xfor|x|<<1

N2lnN22x2=N22lnN22xN2

N2lnN22x2=NlnN22x2N

N2lnN22x2=NlnNNln22x2N

xlnN2+x=xlnN2+xln1+2xN

xlnN2+x=xlnN2+2x2N

05

Fourth Term of Equation

xlnN2x=xlnN2+xln12xN

xlnN2x=xlnN22x2N

ln(Ω)Nln(N)NlnN+Nln2+2x2NxlnN22x2N+xlnN22x2N

ln(Ω)Nln2+2x2N2x2N2x2N

ln(Ω)ln2N2x2N

Ω2Ne2x2N

ΩΩmaxe2x2N

ΩΩmax=2N

06

Peak value (c)

c) Oncethe top declines to 1eof its previous peak, the length of the crest is:

Ωmaxe=Ωmaxe-2x2N

e-1=e-2x2N

2x2N=1

As a response, the peak's girth is increased.

07

Coins  (d)

d) If 1000000 currencies were spun, the probability of getting 501000 heads is (let Nbe the head):

Substitution giving in:

x=NN2

=50100010000002=1000

P=ΩΩmax

P=e2x2N

x=1000and N=1000000are changed, giving in:

P=e2(1000)21000000=0.1353

It wouldn't be a very controversial outcome, given the big likelihood.

Obtaining a conclusion of 510000heads seems to own a likelihood of:

x=NN2

=51000010000002

=10000

P=e2(10000)21000000

=1.384×1087

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose you flip1000 coins.
a What is the probability of getting exactly 500heads and 500tails? (Hint: First write down a formula for the total number of possible outcomes. Then, to determine the "multiplicity" of the 500-500"macrostate," use Stirling's approximation. If you have a fancy calculator that makes Stirling's approximation unnecessary, multiply all the numbers in this problem by 10, or 100, or1000, until Stirling's approximation becomes necessary.)
bWhat is the probability of getting exactly 600heads and400 tails?

Use a pocket calculator to check the accuracy of Stirling's approximation forN=50 . Also check the accuracy of equation 2.16forlnN! .

Use Stirling's approximation to find an approximate formula for the multiplicity of a two-state paramagnet. Simplify this formula in the limit NNto obtain ΩNe/NN. This result should look very similar to your answer to Problem 2.17; explain why these two systems, in the limits considered, are essentially the same.

This problem gives an alternative approach to estimating the width of the peak of the multiplicity function for a system of two large Einstein solids.

(a) Consider two identical Einstein solids, each with Noscillators, in thermal contact with each other. Suppose that the total number of energy units in the combined system is exactly 2N. How many different macrostates (that is, possible values for the total energy in the first solid) are there for this combined system?

(b) Use the result of Problem2.18to find an approximate expression for the total number of microstates for the combined system. (Hint: Treat the combined system as a single Einstein solid. Do not throw away factors of "large" numbers, since you will eventually be dividing two "very large" numbers that are nearly equal. Answer: 24N/8πN.)

(c) The most likely macrostate for this system is (of course) the one in which the energy is shared equally between the two solids. Use the result of Problem 2.18to find an approximate expression for the multiplicity of this macrostate. (Answer:24N/(4πN) .)

(d) You can get a rough idea of the "sharpness" of the multiplicity function by comparing your answers to parts (b) and (c). Part (c) tells you the height of the peak, while part (b) tells you the total area under the entire graph. As a very crude approximation, pretend that the peak's shape is rectangular. In this case, how wide would it be? Out of all the macrostates, what fraction have reasonably large probabilities? Evaluate this fraction numerically for the case N=1023.

Suppose you flip four fair coins.

(a) Make a list of all the possible outcomes, as in Table 2.1.

(b) Make a list of all the different "macrostates" and their probabilities.

(c) Compute the multiplicity of each macrostate using the combinatorial formula 2.6, and check that these results agree with what you got by bruteforce counting.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free