Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a two-state paramagnet with 1023elementary dipoles, with the total energy fixed at zero so that exactly half the dipoles point up and half point down.

(a) How many microstates are "accessible" to this system?

(b) Suppose that the microstate of this system changes a billion times per second. How many microstates will it explore in ten billion years (the age of the universe)?

(c) Is it correct to say that, if you wait long enough, a system will eventually be found in every "accessible" microstate? Explain your answer, and discuss the meaning of the word "accessible."

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The accessible microstates to the present system is Ω2N=2N23

(b) There are 3.15576×1026microstates will it explore in ten billion years.

(c) For all this to develop, we'd to require almost a vast quantity of days (at least here on scope of the planet's present era).

Step by step solution

01

Microstates (a)

(a) Assume we get a paramagnet has N=1023 magnets, and shut to half them are as in spin-up state, giving in N↑=N↓=12N,, whereby N signifies the energy units..This technique provides quantity of microstates:

Ω=N+N+1N=N2+N2+1N2

when N is simply a good number

ΩNN2=N!N2!N2!

For such design variables, we will employ Stirling's approximation:

n!2πnnnen

Ω2πNNNeN2πN2N2N2eN22

Ω2πNNNeN2πN2N2NeN

localid="1650343548696" Ω2πNNNπNN2N

Ω2πN2NπNΩ2N+12πN

Ω2N=2N23

where every other line probably applies for Namounts about 1023, although this makes 2N a really vast concentration, but dividing by the denominator won't make a big difference.

02

Independent States (b) and (c)

(b) Above a ten-billion-year interval, if the machine was during a changing microstate a billion views a second, it'd examine:

109×1010×365.25×24×3600=3.15576×1026microstates

The variability of microstates allowed is:

21023103×1022

As both a result, the quantity of independent states accessed over 10 billion centuriesis simply alittle fraction among those possible.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider again the system of two large, identical Einstein solids treated in Problem 2.22.

(a) For the case N=1023, compute the entropy of this system (in terms of Boltzmann's constant), assuming that all of the microstates are allowed. (This is the system's entropy over long time scales.)

(b) Compute the entropy again, assuming that the system is in its most likely macro state. (This is the system's entropy over short time scales, except when there is a large and unlikely fluctuation away from the most likely macro state.)

(c) Is the issue of time scales really relevant to the entropy of this system?

(d) Suppose that, at a moment when the system is near its most likely macro state, you suddenly insert a partition between the solids so that they can no longer exchange energy. Now, even over long time scales, the entropy is given by your answer to part (b). Since this number is less than your answer to part (a), you have, in a sense, caused a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. Is this violation significant? Should we lose any sleep over it?

Use a computer to reproduce the table and graph in Figure2.4: two Einstein solids, each containing three harmonic oscillators, with a total of six units of energy. Then modify the table and graph to show the case where one Einstein solid contains six harmonic oscillators and the other contains four harmonic oscillators (with the total number of energy units still equal to six). Assuming that all microstates are equally likely, what is the most probable macrostate, and what is its probability? What is the least probable macrostate, and what is its probability?

Use the Sackur-Tetrode equation to calculate the entropy of a mole of argon gas at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Why is the entropy greater than that of a mole of helium under the same conditions?

Use a computer to produce a table and graph, like those in this section, for two interacting two-state paramagnets, each containing 100 elementary magnetic dipoles. Take a "unit" of energy to be the amount needed to flip a single dipole from the "up" state (parallel to the external field) to the "down" state (antiparallel). Suppose that the total number of units of energy, relative to the state with all dipoles pointing up, is80; this energy can be shared in any way between the two paramagnets. What is the most probable macrostate, and what is its probability? What is the least probable macrostate, and what is its probability?

According to the Sackur-Tetrode equation, the entropy of a monatomic ideal gas can become negative when its temperature (and hence its energy) is sufficiently low. Of course this is absurd, so the Sackur-Tetrode equation must be invalid at very low temperatures. Suppose you start with a sample of helium at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, then lower the temperature holding the density fixed. Pretend that the helium remains a gas and does not liquefy. Below what temperature would the Sackur-Tetrode equation predict that Sis negative? (The behavior of gases at very low temperatures is the main subject of Chapter 7.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free