Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a collection of 10,000 atoms of rubidium- 87 , confined inside a box of volume (10-5m)3.

(a) Calculate ε0, the energy of the ground state. (Express your answer in both joules and electron-volts.)

(b) Calculate the condensation temperature, and compare kTctoε0.

(c) Suppose that T=0.9TcHow many atoms are in the ground state? How close is the chemical potential to the ground-state energy? How many atoms are in each of the (threefold-degenerate) first excited states?

(d) Repeat parts (b) and (c) for the case of 106atoms, confined to the same volume. Discuss the conditions under which the number of atoms in the ground state will be much greater than the number in the first excited state.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a). The energy of the Rubidium in the ground state is 7.1×10-14.

(b). Condensation temperature is 8.6×10-8K.

(c). The number of particles in excited state is less than that of the number of particles in ground state.

(d). The number of particles in ground state is greater than that of the number of particles in excited state.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given information

The energy levels of a particle confined to an infinite well with walls located at x=0andx=Lwill be,

En=n2h28mL2

Plank's Constant, h=6.626×10-34J.s

Mass of particle, m=14.4×10-26kg

Length of box, L=10-5m

andnis the positive integer(n=1,2,3,...)

02

Step 2. (a) Considering a free particle inside a box with lengths L1, L2, and L3 along the axis x, y, and z  respectively

Therefore the energy levels of particle confined to this box are,

Enx,ny,nz=Enx+Eny+Enz

=nx2h28mLx2+ny2h28mLy2+nz2h28mLz2

=h28mnx2Lx2+ny2Ly2+nz2Lz2

here the box is taken as cube, so Lx=Ly=Lz=L. Thus the equation become

Enx,ny,nt=h28mL2nx2+ny2+nz2 ( Equation-1)
03

Step 3. Now finding the value of ε0,  For the ground state, nx,ny,nz=(1,1,1). 

Therefore the equation-1 become

ε0=h28m(1)2L2+(1)2(L)2+(1)2(L)2

=h28m3L2

ε0=3h28mL2 (Equation-2)

04

Step 4. Substituting the value of  h, L, m in Equation-2

we get,

ε0=36.626×10-34J·s2814.4×10-26kg10-52

=1.14×10-32J

Converting the values from JtoeV.

ε0=1.14×10-32J1.0eV1.602×10-49J

=7.1×10-14eV

The energy of the Rubidium in the ground =7.1×10-14eV.

05

Step 5. (b) To find the Condensate temperature,Tc we have kBTc=0.527h22πmNV23

Here,

N/V= number of atoms per unit volume,

kB= Boltzmann constant =8.617×10-5eV/K

V=L3= Volume of box

Substituting the value of V=L3in above equation,

kBTC=0.527h22πm2NL323

=0.5272πh2mL2(N)23

06

Step 6. Substituting the value of 83ε0 for h2mL2

we get,

kBTc=0.5272π83ε0(N)23

kBTcε0=(0.224)(N)23

substituting N=10000

kBTcε0=(0.224)(10,000)23

=104

Tc=(104)ε0kB

Substituting the value of ε0,kB

Tc=(104)7.1×10-14eV8.617×10-5eV/K

=8.6×10-8K

Therefore, Condensation temperature=8.6×10-8K

07

Step 7. (c) To find the number of atoms in ground state, we have 

the relation between temperature and condensate temperature,

T=0.9Tc

TTc=0.9

The formula for number of atoms in ground state is,

N0=1-TTe32N

N0=1-(0.9)32N

=(0.146)N

As N=10000,

N0=1460

Therefore number of atoms in ground state=1460

08

Step 8. To find the number of atoms in excited state, we have

Formula of chemical potential, μ=ε0-kBTN0

ε0-μ=kBTN0

Substituting T=0.9Tc,

ε0-μ=kB0.9TcN0

=0.9kBTcN0

Puting the value of kB,Tc,andN0,

ε0-μ=0.98.617×10-5eV/K8.6×10-8K1460

ε0-μ=4.6×10-15eV

=(0.065)7.1×10-14eV

=(0.065)ε0

μ=ε0-(0.065)ε0

The formula for the energy of first excited state is,

ε1=h28mL222+12+12

=6h28mL2

=23h28mL2

Substituting 3h28mL2=ε0

ε1=2ε0

The formula for number of atoms in excited state is

N1=1eε1-μ/kBT-1

Puting the value of ε1,μ,kB,T, we get

N1=1e2ε0-ε0-(0.065)ε0/kB0.9Tc-1

=1eε0+(0.065)ε0/(0.9)kBTc-1

=1e(1.065)ϵ0/(0.9)kBTc-1

Substituting the values of ε0,kB,Tc, we get

N1=1e(1.065)7.1×10-14eV(0.9)8.617×10-5eV/K8.6×10-8K-1

=87

Thus, in one excited state we have 87particles and for three excited state we have 3(87)=261

Since, 261<1460

Therefore, The number of particles in excited state is less than that of the number of particles in ground state.

09

Step 9. (d) The new value of N=106,

Substituting the value of N=106in equation kBTcε0=(0.224)(N)23

kBTCε0=(0.224)10623

=2240

Tc=(2240)ε0kB

Puting the value of ε0,kB

Tc=(2240)7.1×10-14eV8.617×10-5eV/K

=1.85×10-6K

therefore the condensate temperature ==1.85×10-6K=1.85×10-6K

10

Step 10. For the number of particles in ground state

we have,

N0=(0.146)N

Substituting the value of N=106

N0=(0.146)106

=1.46×105

Therefore the number of particles in ground state=1.46×105

11

Step 11. To find the number of particles in excited state

Substituting the new value of N0,Tc,kBin the equation ε0-μ=0.9kBTcN0

ε0-μ=0.98.617×10-5eV/K1.85×10-6K1.46×105

=9.8×10-16eV

=(0.0138)7.1×10-14eV

(0.014)ε0

μ=ε0-(0.014)ε0

Formula for energy of first excited state = ε1=23h28mL2

substituting 3h28mL2=ε0

ε1=2ε0

Formula for the number of atoms in the excited state = N1=1eϵ1-μ/kBT-1

Substituting the value of ε1,μ,kB,T

N1=1e2ε0-c0-(0.014)ε0/kB0.9Tc-1

=1e(1.014)ϵ0/(0.9)kBTc-1

Putting the values of ε0,kB,Tc

N1=1e(1.014)7.1×10-14ev/(0.9)8.617×10-5eV/K1.85×10-6K-1

1990

Thus, in one excited state we have 1990particles and for the three excited states we have 3(1990)=5970

Since, 5970<1.46×105

Therefore, the number of particles in ground state is greater than that of the number of particles in excited state.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A ferromagnet is a material (like iron) that magnetizes spontaneously, even in the absence of an externally applied magnetic field. This happens because each elementary dipole has a strong tendency to align parallel to its neighbors. At t=0the magnetization of a ferromagnet has the maximum possible value, with all dipoles perfectly lined up; if there are Natoms, the total magnetization is typically~2μeN, where µa is the Bohr magneton. At somewhat higher temperatures, the excitations take the form of spin waves, which can be visualized classically as shown in Figure 7.30. Like sound waves, spin waves are quantized: Each wave mode can have only integer multiples of a basic energy unit. In analogy with phonons, we think of the energy units as particles, called magnons. Each magnon reduces the total spin of the system by one unit of h21rand therefore reduces the magnetization by ~2μe. However, whereas the frequency of a sound wave is inversely proportional to its wavelength, the frequency of a spin-wave is proportional to the square of 1λ.. (in the limit of long wavelengths). Therefore, since=hfand p=hλ.. for any "particle," the energy of a magnon is proportional

In the ground state of a ferromagnet, all the elementary dipoles point in the same direction. The lowest-energy excitations above the ground state are spin waves, in which the dipoles precess in a conical motion. A long-wavelength spin wave carries very little energy because the difference in direction between neighboring dipoles is very small.

to the square of its momentum. In analogy with the energy-momentum relation for an ordinary nonrelativistic particle, we can write =p22pm*, wherem* is a constant related to the spin-spin interaction energy and the atomic spacing. For iron, m* turns out to equal 1.24×1029kg, about14times the mass of an electron. Another difference between magnons and phonons is that each magnon ( or spin-wave mode) has only one possible polarization.

(a) Show that at low temperatures, the number of magnons per unit volume in a three-dimensional ferromagnet is given by

NmV=2π2m×kTh2320xex-1dx.

Evaluate the integral numerically.

(b) Use the result of part (a) to find an expression for the fractional reduction in magnetization, (M(O)-M(T))/M(O).Write your answer in the form (T/To)32, and estimate the constantT0for iron.

(c) Calculate the heat capacity due to magnetic excitations in a ferromagnet at low temperature. You should find Cv/Nk=(T/Ti)32, where Tidiffers from To only by a numerical constant. EstimateTifor iron, and compare the magnon and phonon contributions to the heat capacity. (The Debye temperature of iron is 470k.)

(d) Consider a two-dimensional array of magnetic dipoles at low temperature. Assume that each elementary dipole can still point in any (threedimensional) direction, so spin waves are still possible. Show that the integral for the total number of magnons diverge in this case. (This result is an indication that there can be no spontaneous magnetization in such a two-dimensional system. However, in Section 8.2we will consider a different two-dimensional model in which magnetization does occur.)

In Section 6.5 I derived the useful relation F=-kTln(Z)between the Helmholtz free energy and the ordinary partition function. Use analogous argument to prove that ϕ=-kT×ln(Z^), where Z^ is the grand partition function and ϕis the grand free energy introduced in Problem 5.23.

Consider a gas of noninteracting spin-0 bosons at high temperatures, when TTc. (Note that “high” in this sense can still mean below 1 K.)

  1. Show that, in this limit, the Bose-Einstein function can be written approximately as
    n¯BE=e(μ)/kT[1+eμ/kT+].
  2. Keeping only the terms shown above, plug this result into equation 7.122 to derive the first quantum correction to the chemical potential for gas of bosons.
  3. Use the properties of the grand free energy (Problems 5.23 and 7.7) to show that the pressure of any system is given by In P=(kT/V), where Zis the grand partition function. Argue that, for gas of noninteracting particles, In Zcan be computed as the sum over all modes (or single-particle states) of In Zi, where Zi; is the grand partition function for the ithmode.
  4. Continuing with the result of part (c), write the sum over modes as an integral over energy, using the density of states. Evaluate this integral explicitly for gas of noninteracting bosons in the high-temperature limit, using the result of part (b) for the chemical potential and expanding the logarithm as appropriate. When the smoke clears, you should find
    p=NkTV(1NvQ42V),
    again neglecting higher-order terms. Thus, quantum statistics results in a lowering of the pressure of a boson gas, as one might expect.
  5. Write the result of part (d) in the form of the virial expansion introduced in Problem 1.17, and read off the second virial coefficient, B(T). Plot the predicted B(T)for a hypothetical gas of noninteracting helium-4 atoms.
  6. Repeat this entire problem for gas of spin-1/2 fermions. (Very few modifications are necessary.) Discuss the results, and plot the predicted virial coefficient for a hypothetical gas of noninteracting helium-3 atoms.

Consider a system consisting of a single impurity atom/ion in a semiconductor. Suppose that the impurity atom has one "extra" electron compared to the neighboring atoms, as would a phosphorus atom occupying a lattice site in a silicon crystal. The extra electron is then easily removed, leaving behind a positively charged ion. The ionized electron is called a conduction electron, because it is free to move through the material; the impurity atom is called a donor, because it can "donate" a conduction electron. This system is analogous to the hydrogen atom considered in the previous two problems except that the ionization energy is much less, mainly due to the screening of the ionic charge by the dielectric behavior of the medium.

At the center of the sun, the temperature is approximately 107K and the concentration of electrons is approximately 1032 per cubic meter. Would it be (approximately) valid to treat these electrons as a "classical" ideal gas (using Boltzmann statistics), or as a degenerate Fermi gas (with T0 ), or neither?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free