Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For a brief time in the early universe, the temperature was hot enough to produce large numbers of electron-positron pairs. These pairs then constituted a third type of "background radiation," in addition to the photons and neutrinos (see Figure 7.21). Like neutrinos, electrons and positrons are fermions. Unlike neutrinos, electrons and positrons are known to be massive (ea.ch with the same mass), and each has two independent polarization states. During the time period of interest, the densities of electrons and positrons were approximately equal, so it is a good approximation to set the chemical potentials equal to zero as in Figure 7.21. When the temperature was greater than the electron mass times c2k, the universe was filled with three types of radiation: electrons and positrons (solid arrows); neutrinos (dashed); and photons (wavy). Bathed in this radiation were a few protons and neutrons, roughly one for every billion radiation particles. the previous problem. Recall from special relativity that the energy of a massive particle is ϵ=(pc)2+mc22.

(a) Show that the energy density of electrons and positrons at temperature Tis given by

u(T)=0x2x2+mc2/kT2ex2+mc2/kT2+1dx;whereu(T)=0x2x2+mc2/kT2ex2+mc2/kT2+1dx

(b) Show that u(T)goes to zero when kTmc2, and explain why this is a

reasonable result.

( c) Evaluate u(T)in the limit kTmc2, and compare to the result of the

the previous problem for the neutrino radiation.

(d) Use a computer to calculate and plot u(T)at intermediate temperatures.

(e) Use the method of Problem 7.46, part (d), to show that the free energy

density of the electron-positron radiation is

FV=-16π(kT)4(hc)3f(T);wheref(T)=0x2ln1+e-x2+mc2/kT2dx

Evaluate f(T)in both limits, and use a computer to calculate and plot f(T)at intermediate

temperatures.

(f) Write the entropy of the electron-positron radiation in terms of the functions

uTand f(T). Evaluate the entropy explicitly in the high-T limit.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a). The energy density of electrons is U=16π(kT)4V(hc)3u(T)

(b). By observing the graph, it can be concluded that the result is reasonable.

(c). The result of the neutrino radiation

U=14π5V(kT)415(hc)3

(d). The plot at intermediate temperatures is

(e). Since, FV=-16π(kT)4(hc)3f(T). Hence, Proved.

(f). The entropy of the electron-positron radiation F=-16πV(kT)4(hc)3f(T).

Step by step solution

01

Part(a) Step 1: Given information

We have to prove that energy density of electron and positrons is given byu(T)=0x2x2+mc2/kT2ex2+mc2/kT2+1dx

02

Part(a) Step 2: Solution

Probability of any single state state to be occupiedn¯FD=1eϵ/kT+1

Total energy equalsU=2·2nxnynzϵn¯FD

Energy of massive particleϵ=(pc)2+mc22

U=4nx,ny,nz(pc)2+mc22e(pc)2+mc22/kT+1

Changing sum to integral U=40π/2dΦ0π/2sin(θ)dθ0n2(pc)2+mc22e(pc)2+mc22/kT+1dn

U=2π0n2(hcn/2L)2+mc22e(hcn/2L)2+mc22/kT+1dn

U=2π2LkThc30x2(xkT)2+mc22e(xkT)2+mc22/kT+1dx

U=16π(kT)4V(hc)3u(T)whereu(T)=0x2x2+mc2/kT2ex2+mc2/kT2+1dx

03

Part(b) Step 1: Given information:

We have to Evaluate :u(T0)=0

04

Part(b)  Step 2: Simplify

u(T)=0x3ex+1dx

0x3ex+1dx=7π4120

U=14π5V(kT)415(hc)3

05

Part(c) Step 1: Given information

We have been given that u(T)=0x2x2+(1/t)2ex2+(1/t)2+1dx

06

Part(c) Step 2:Simplify

To plot the function,we get graph

07

Part(d) Step 1: given information

we have been given thatF=-kTln(Z)

08

Part(d) Step 2: Simplify

F=-4nxnynzkTln1+e-ϵ/kT=-4nx,ny,nzkTln1+e-ϵ/kT

ϵ=(pc)2+mc22

F=-16πV(kT)4(hc)3f(T)

09

Part(e) Step 1:Given information

Se have been given thatF=-kTln1+e-ϵ/kT

10

Part(e) Step 2:Simplify

The spherical coordinator is

F=-4kT0π/2dΦ0π/2sin(θ)dθ0n2ln1+e-ϵ/kTdn

ϵ=(pc)2+mc22

11

Prt(f) Step 1:Given information

We have been thatF=-16πV(kT)4(hc)3f(T)

12

Part(f) Step 2:Simplify

The Helmotz free energy us

S=16πV(kT)3(hc)3(u(T)+f(T))k

S=56π5V(kT)345(hc)3k

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove that the peak of the Planck spectrum is at x = 2.82.

In Problem 7.28you found the density of states and the chemical potential for a two-dimensional Fermi gas. Calculate the heat capacity of this gas in the limit role="math" localid="1650099524353" kTεF· Also show that the heat capacity has the expected behavior when kTεF. Sketch the heat capacity as a function of temperature.

Most spin-1/2 fermions, including electrons and helium-3 atoms, have nonzero magnetic moments. A gas of such particles is therefore paramagnetic. Consider, for example, a gas of free electrons, confined inside a three-dimensional box. The z component of the magnetic moment of each electron is ±µa. In the presence of a magnetic field B pointing in the z direction, each "up" state acquires an additional energy of -μBB, while each "down" state acquires an additional energy of +μBB

(a) Explain why you would expect the magnetization of a degenerate electron gas to be substantially less than that of the electronic paramagnets studied in Chapters 3 and 6, for a given number of particles at a given field strength.

(b) Write down a formula for the density of states of this system in the presence of a magnetic field B, and interpret your formula graphically.

(c) The magnetization of this system is μBN-N, where Nr and N1 are the numbers of electrons with up and down magnetic moments, respectively. Find a formula for the magnetization of this system at T=0, in terms of N, µa, B, and the Fermi energy.

(d) Find the first temperature-dependent correction to your answer to part (c), in the limit TTF. You may assume that μBBkT; this implies that the presence of the magnetic field has negligible effect on the chemical potential μ. (To avoid confusing µB with µ, I suggest using an abbreviation such as o for the quantity µaB.)

A ferromagnet is a material (like iron) that magnetizes spontaneously, even in the absence of an externally applied magnetic field. This happens because each elementary dipole has a strong tendency to align parallel to its neighbors. At t=0the magnetization of a ferromagnet has the maximum possible value, with all dipoles perfectly lined up; if there are Natoms, the total magnetization is typically~2μeN, where µa is the Bohr magneton. At somewhat higher temperatures, the excitations take the form of spin waves, which can be visualized classically as shown in Figure 7.30. Like sound waves, spin waves are quantized: Each wave mode can have only integer multiples of a basic energy unit. In analogy with phonons, we think of the energy units as particles, called magnons. Each magnon reduces the total spin of the system by one unit of h21rand therefore reduces the magnetization by ~2μe. However, whereas the frequency of a sound wave is inversely proportional to its wavelength, the frequency of a spin-wave is proportional to the square of 1λ.. (in the limit of long wavelengths). Therefore, since=hfand p=hλ.. for any "particle," the energy of a magnon is proportional

In the ground state of a ferromagnet, all the elementary dipoles point in the same direction. The lowest-energy excitations above the ground state are spin waves, in which the dipoles precess in a conical motion. A long-wavelength spin wave carries very little energy because the difference in direction between neighboring dipoles is very small.

to the square of its momentum. In analogy with the energy-momentum relation for an ordinary nonrelativistic particle, we can write =p22pm*, wherem* is a constant related to the spin-spin interaction energy and the atomic spacing. For iron, m* turns out to equal 1.24×1029kg, about14times the mass of an electron. Another difference between magnons and phonons is that each magnon ( or spin-wave mode) has only one possible polarization.

(a) Show that at low temperatures, the number of magnons per unit volume in a three-dimensional ferromagnet is given by

NmV=2π2m×kTh2320xex-1dx.

Evaluate the integral numerically.

(b) Use the result of part (a) to find an expression for the fractional reduction in magnetization, (M(O)-M(T))/M(O).Write your answer in the form (T/To)32, and estimate the constantT0for iron.

(c) Calculate the heat capacity due to magnetic excitations in a ferromagnet at low temperature. You should find Cv/Nk=(T/Ti)32, where Tidiffers from To only by a numerical constant. EstimateTifor iron, and compare the magnon and phonon contributions to the heat capacity. (The Debye temperature of iron is 470k.)

(d) Consider a two-dimensional array of magnetic dipoles at low temperature. Assume that each elementary dipole can still point in any (threedimensional) direction, so spin waves are still possible. Show that the integral for the total number of magnons diverge in this case. (This result is an indication that there can be no spontaneous magnetization in such a two-dimensional system. However, in Section 8.2we will consider a different two-dimensional model in which magnetization does occur.)

Consider two single-particle states, A and B, in a system of fermions, where ϵA=μ-xand ϵB=μ+x; that is, level A lies below μ by the same amount that level B lies above μ. Prove that the probability of level B being occupied is the same as the probability of level A being unoccupied. In other words, the Fermi-Dirac distribution is "symmetrical" about the point where ϵ=μ.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free