Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Carry out the Sommerfeld expansion for the energy integral (7.54), to obtain equation 7.67. Then plug in the expansion for μto obtain the final answer, equation 7.68.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The final answer, equation 7.68isU35NεF+π24NεF(kT2).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

We have been given that the energy integral 7.54isU=0εg(ε)n¯FD(ε)dε.

The Equation 7.67, U=35Nμ52εF32+3π28N(kT)2εF+.....and equation 7.68, U=35NεF+π24N(kT)2εF+.....are given.

We need to Carry out the Sommerfeld expansion for the energy integral 7.54to obtain equation 7.67. Then we have to plug in the expansion for μto obtain the final answer, equation 7.68.

02

Simplify

The given total energy integral 7.54is

localid="1650054588139" U=0εg(ε)n¯FD(ε)dε

localid="1650054613027" U=g00ε32n¯FD(ε)dε

Integrating by parts, we get:

U=25g0ε53n¯FD|0-25g00ε52n¯FDεdε (Let this equation be (1))

If we substitute ε=0, the integral will become zero(0)due to the dependence of the term on ε53and the first term vanishes. If we substitute with , the exponential term in the denominator will grow faster than ε52.

So the equation (1) reduces to :

U=25g00ε52n¯FDεdε (Let this equation be (2))

We know that n¯FD=1e(ε-μ)kT+1

By Taking derivative with respect to ε, we get

n¯FDε=1e(ε-μ)kT+1ε

On simplifying,

we getn¯FDε=-1kTe(ε-μ)kT(e(ε-μ)kT+1)2 (Let this equation be (3))

Let (ε-μ)kT=x, the equation (3) becomes :

dx=dεkT

Substitute dx,xand n¯FDεin equation (2), we get

U=25g00ε521kTex(ex+1)2kTdx

U=25g00e52ex(ex+1)2dx (Let this equation be (4))

03

Finding the values of integrals.

As we need to change the integration boundaries also, so :

εxε0x-μkT

As kTμ, so we can put the lower limit of integral in equation (4) as -,

The integral in equation (4) becomes :

U=25g0-ε52ex(ex+1)2dx (Let this equation be (5))

Now expand the term ε52using Taylor series about μ,

ε52=μ52+52(ε-μ)μ32+158(ε-μ)2μ12+...

Substitute ε-μ=kTx,

ε52=μ52+52(kTx)μ32+158(kTx)2μ12+...

Substitute the value of ε52in equation (5), we get three integrals say I1,I2,I3,we get:

U=25g0(I1+I2+I3) (Let this equation be (6))

where,

I1=μ52-ex(ex+1)2dx

I2=52kTμ32-xex(ex+1)2dx

I3=158(kT)2μ12-x2ex(ex+1)2dx

Simplifying three integrals I1,I2,I3, we get :

I1=μ52

The second integral I2is odd integral, the integration of integral is from -to , so the integral I2is directly zero .

I2=0

I3=158(kT)2μ12mfrac23=5π28(kT)2μ12

04

Substituting the values of integrals 

By Substituting the values of the three integrals I1,I2,I3in equation (6), we get

U25g0μ52+5π28(kT)2μ12U25g0μ52+g0π24(kT)2μ12

Substitute g0=32NεF32, we get:

U35NεF32μ52+NεF323π28(kT)2μ12

Set μ=εFin second term, we get

U35NεF32μ52+NεF3π28(kT)2 (Let this equation be (7))

The equation (7.66) is given by:

μ52=εF521-π212kTεF252

By expanding the terms in the brackets, we get:

μ52=εF521-5π224kTεF2

Substitute the value of μ52in equation (7), we get:

U35NεF32εF521-5π224kTεF2+NεF3π28(kT)2

U35NεF1-5π224kTεF2+NεF3π28(kT)2

U35NεF-18Nπ2εFkTεF2+NεF3π28(kT)2

U35NεF-NεFπ28(kT)2+NεF3π28(kT)2

U35NεF+NεFπ2εFπ24(kT)2

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The previous two problems dealt with pure semiconductors, also called intrinsic semiconductors. Useful semiconductor devices are instead made from doped semiconductors, which contain substantial numbers of impurity atoms. One example of a doped semiconductor was treated in Problem 7.5. Let us now consider that system again. (Note that in Problem 7.5 we measured all energies relative to the bottom of the conduction band, Ee. We also neglected the distinction between g0and g0c; this simplification happens to be ok for conduction electrons in silicon.)

(a) Calculate and plot the chemical potential as afunction of temperature, for silicon doped with 1017phosphorus atoms per cm3(as in Problem 7.5). Continue to assume that the conduction electrons can be treated as an ordinary ideal gas.

(b) Discuss whether it is legitimate to assume for this system that the conduction electrons can be treated asan ordinary ideal gas, as opposed to a Fermi gas. Give some numerical examples.

(c)Estimate the temperature at which the number of valence electrons excitedto the conduction band would become comparable to the number ofconduction electrons from donor impurities. Which source of conductionelectrons is more important at room temperature?

Most spin-1/2 fermions, including electrons and helium-3 atoms, have nonzero magnetic moments. A gas of such particles is therefore paramagnetic. Consider, for example, a gas of free electrons, confined inside a three-dimensional box. The z component of the magnetic moment of each electron is ±µa. In the presence of a magnetic field B pointing in the z direction, each "up" state acquires an additional energy of -μBB, while each "down" state acquires an additional energy of +μBB

(a) Explain why you would expect the magnetization of a degenerate electron gas to be substantially less than that of the electronic paramagnets studied in Chapters 3 and 6, for a given number of particles at a given field strength.

(b) Write down a formula for the density of states of this system in the presence of a magnetic field B, and interpret your formula graphically.

(c) The magnetization of this system is μBN-N, where Nr and N1 are the numbers of electrons with up and down magnetic moments, respectively. Find a formula for the magnetization of this system at T=0, in terms of N, µa, B, and the Fermi energy.

(d) Find the first temperature-dependent correction to your answer to part (c), in the limit TTF. You may assume that μBBkT; this implies that the presence of the magnetic field has negligible effect on the chemical potential μ. (To avoid confusing µB with µ, I suggest using an abbreviation such as o for the quantity µaB.)

Starting from equation 7.83, derive a formula for the density of states of a photon gas (or any other gas of ultra relativistic particles having two polarisation states). Sketch this function.

Number of photons in a photon gas.

(a) Show that the number of photons in equilibrium in a box of volume V at temperature T is

N=8πVkThc30x2ex-1dx

The integral cannot be done analytically; either look it up in a table or evaluate it numerically.

(b) How does this result compare to the formula derived in the text for the entropy of a photon gas? (What is the entropy per photon, in terms of k?)

(c) Calculate the number of photons per cubic meter at the following temperatures: 300 K; 1500 K (a typical kiln); 2.73 K (the cosmic background radiation).

A ferromagnet is a material (like iron) that magnetizes spontaneously, even in the absence of an externally applied magnetic field. This happens because each elementary dipole has a strong tendency to align parallel to its neighbors. At t=0the magnetization of a ferromagnet has the maximum possible value, with all dipoles perfectly lined up; if there are Natoms, the total magnetization is typically~2μeN, where µa is the Bohr magneton. At somewhat higher temperatures, the excitations take the form of spin waves, which can be visualized classically as shown in Figure 7.30. Like sound waves, spin waves are quantized: Each wave mode can have only integer multiples of a basic energy unit. In analogy with phonons, we think of the energy units as particles, called magnons. Each magnon reduces the total spin of the system by one unit of h21rand therefore reduces the magnetization by ~2μe. However, whereas the frequency of a sound wave is inversely proportional to its wavelength, the frequency of a spin-wave is proportional to the square of 1λ.. (in the limit of long wavelengths). Therefore, since=hfand p=hλ.. for any "particle," the energy of a magnon is proportional

In the ground state of a ferromagnet, all the elementary dipoles point in the same direction. The lowest-energy excitations above the ground state are spin waves, in which the dipoles precess in a conical motion. A long-wavelength spin wave carries very little energy because the difference in direction between neighboring dipoles is very small.

to the square of its momentum. In analogy with the energy-momentum relation for an ordinary nonrelativistic particle, we can write =p22pm*, wherem* is a constant related to the spin-spin interaction energy and the atomic spacing. For iron, m* turns out to equal 1.24×1029kg, about14times the mass of an electron. Another difference between magnons and phonons is that each magnon ( or spin-wave mode) has only one possible polarization.

(a) Show that at low temperatures, the number of magnons per unit volume in a three-dimensional ferromagnet is given by

NmV=2π2m×kTh2320xex-1dx.

Evaluate the integral numerically.

(b) Use the result of part (a) to find an expression for the fractional reduction in magnetization, (M(O)-M(T))/M(O).Write your answer in the form (T/To)32, and estimate the constantT0for iron.

(c) Calculate the heat capacity due to magnetic excitations in a ferromagnet at low temperature. You should find Cv/Nk=(T/Ti)32, where Tidiffers from To only by a numerical constant. EstimateTifor iron, and compare the magnon and phonon contributions to the heat capacity. (The Debye temperature of iron is 470k.)

(d) Consider a two-dimensional array of magnetic dipoles at low temperature. Assume that each elementary dipole can still point in any (threedimensional) direction, so spin waves are still possible. Show that the integral for the total number of magnons diverge in this case. (This result is an indication that there can be no spontaneous magnetization in such a two-dimensional system. However, in Section 8.2we will consider a different two-dimensional model in which magnetization does occur.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free