Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Although the integrals (7.53and 7.54) forNand Ucannot be

carried out analytically for all T, it's not difficult to evaluate them numerically

using a computer. This calculation has little relevance for electrons in metals (for

which the limit kT<<EFis always sufficient), but it is needed for liquid H3eand

for astrophysical systems like the electrons at the center of the sun.

(a) As a warm-up exercise, evaluate theNintegral (7.53) for the casekT=εF

and μ=0, and check that your answer is consistent with the graph shown

above. (Hint: As always when solving a problem on a computer, it's best to

first put everything in terms of dimensionless variables. So let t=kTεFrole="math" localid="1649996205331" ,c=μεF

, and x=εkT. Rewrite everything in terms of these variables,

and then put it on the computer.)

(b) The next step is to varyμ holdingT fixed, until the integral works out to

the desired value,N. Do this for values of kTεFranging from 0.1 up to 2,

and plot the results to reproduce Figure7.16. (It's probably not a good idea

to try to use numerical methods when kTεF is much smaller than 0.1, since

you can start getting overflow errors from exponentiating large numbers.

But this is the region where we've already solved the problem analytically.)

(c) Plug your calculated values ofµ into the energy integral (7.54), and evaluate

that integral numerically to obtain the energy as a function of temperature

forkTup to 2εF Plot the results, and evaluate the slope to obtain the

heat capacity. Check that the heat capacity has the expected behavior at

both low and high temperatures.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) The value of Nintegral is 1.0171.

b) The value of c=-0.0215

c) We get the final equation asUNεF=320x3/2ex-ct+1dx

Step by step solution

01

Part(a) Step 1: Given information 

We have to find that evaluation theNintegral (7.53) for the casekTε0and μ=0, and checking the answer is consistent with the graph shown above.

02

Part(a) Step 2: Simplify 

To find no. of particles,

N=0gε1eε-μkT+1dεgε=3N2εF3/2ε

putting these things, N=03N2εF3/2ε1eε-μkT+1dε1=032εF3/2ε1eε-μkT+1dε

We assume , t=kTεF,c=μεF,x=εεFdx=dεεF

We get , 1=320xex-c/t+1dx1=320xex/t+1dx

using Matlab , RHS integral can be calculated , it comes out to be 1.017, so μis not equals to 0 when εF=kT.

03

Part(b) Step 1: Given information 

We need to varyμholding Tfixed, to get the desired value,N, for values of kT/εFranging from 0.1up to 2,and plotting the results to reproduce Figure 7.15

04

Part(b) Step 2: Simplify 

Here, for specific value of cand , we well find integral , also temperature will be fixed, so we assume the value oft=1. We will find the value of c,so that we get correct result of integral which is 1,to find this we will use Matlab. With respect to the two variables,x andc, equation 1 will be defined, we will integrate with respect to xfrom 0and , so here function will be in variable only, we will calculate the value of c , the interval will be from -1to 0.1 ,

So, c=-0.0215.

Then , We will find constant with different temperatures value, here t will be changed and same instructions will be done . The interval of solutions, will also be changed from -1to 2. We will changetfrom 0.1to 2.0. The following graph will be obtained.

05

Part(c) Step 1: Given information 

We are asked to check that the heat capacity has the expected behavior at both low and high temperatures.

06

Part(c) Step 2: Simplify 

By plotting data in Excel, we will add trend line to actually see the equation which fits into data ,

Here, the equation between tand cfrom graph can be seen ,

c=-08469t2-0.2019x+1.0412U=0εgε1eε-μkT+1dε

We can find the value of energy density here as;

gε=3N2εF3/2εt=kTεF,c=μεF,x=εεFdx=dεεF

Finally , UNεF=320x3/2ex-ct+1dx


We can find heat capacity by doing partial derivative of total energy with respect to to temperature.


Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a gas of nidentical spin-0 bosons confined by an isotropic three-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential. (In the rubidium experiment discussed above, the confining potential was actually harmonic, though not isotropic.) The energy levels in this potential are ε=nhf, where nis any nonnegative integer and fis the classical oscillation frequency. The degeneracy of level nis(n+1)(n+2)/2.

(a) Find a formula for the density of states, g(ε), for an atom confined by this potential. (You may assume n>>1.)

(b) Find a formula for the condensation temperature of this system, in terms of the oscillation frequency f.

(c) This potential effectively confines particles inside a volume of roughly the cube of the oscillation amplitude. The oscillation amplitude, in turn, can be estimated by setting the particle's total energy (of order kT) equal to the potential energy of the "spring." Making these associations, and neglecting all factors of 2 and πand so on, show that your answer to part (b) is roughly equivalent to the formula derived in the text for the condensation temperature of bosons confined inside a box with rigid walls.

(a) Estimate (roughly) the total power radiated by your body, neglecting any energy that is returned by your clothes and environment. (Whatever the color of your skin, its emissivity at infrared wavelengths is quite close to 1; almost any nonmetal is a near-perfect blackbody at these wavelengths.)

(b) Compare the total energy radiated by your body in one day (expressed in kilocalories) to the energy in the food you cat. Why is there such a large discrepancy?

(c) The sun has a mass of 2×1030kgand radiates energy at a rate of 3.9×1026watts. Which puts out more power per units mass-the sun or your body?

Show that when a system is in thermal and diffusive equilibrium with a reservoir, the average number of particles in the system is

N=kTZZμ

where the partial derivative is taken at fixed temperature and volume. Show also that the mean square number of particles is

N2¯=(kT)2Z2Zμ2

Use these results to show that the standard deviation of Nis

σN=kTN/μ,

in analogy with Problem6.18Finally, apply this formula to an ideal gas, to obtain a simple expression forσNin terms ofN¯Discuss your result briefly.

Consider a free Fermi gas in two dimensions, confined to a square area A=L2

(a) Find the Fermi energy (in terms of Nand A), and show that the average energy of the particles is F2.

(b) Derive a formula for the density of states. You should find that it is a constant, independent of .

(c) Explain how the chemical potential of this system should behave as a function of temperature, both when role="math" localid="1650186338941" kTFand when Tis much higher.

(d) Because gis a constant for this system, it is possible to carry out the integral 7.53 for the number of particles analytically. Do so, and solve for μas a function of N. Show that the resulting formula has the expected qualitative behavior.

(e) Show that in the high-temperature limit, kTF, the chemical potential of this system is the same as that of an ordinary ideal gas.

Suppose that the concentration of infrared-absorbing gases in earth's atmosphere were to double, effectively creating a second "blanket" to warm the surface. Estimate the equilibrium surface temperature of the earth that would result from this catastrophe. (Hint: First show that the lower atmospheric blanket is warmer than the upper one by a factor of 21/4. The surface is warmer than the lower blanket by a smaller factor.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free