Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Problem 2.32you computed the entropy of an ideal monatomic gas that lives in a two-dimensional universe. Take partial derivatives with respect to U,A, and N to determine the temperature, pressure, and chemical potential of this gas. (In two dimensions, pressure is defined as force per unit length.) Simplify your results as much as possible, and explain whether they make sense.

Short Answer

Expert verified

T=UNkP=NkTAμ=kTlnVN2mmkTh23/22

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

The entropy of an ideal gas is,

S=Nkln2πmAU(Nh)2+2

02

Calculation

To get the temperature, we partial differentiate with respect to U,

1T=SUA,N1T=UNkln2mmAU(Nh)2+2=Nk(Nh)22xmAU2nmA(Nh)2=NkUT=UNk

Partial differentiating with respect to A, we get the pressure as,

P=TSAU,N=TANkln2mnUU(Nh)2+2=NkT(Nh)22πnAU×2mmU(Nh)2=NkTA

03

Chemical Potential

Partial differentiating the entropy with respect to N, we get the chemical potential as,

μ=TSdNUA=TdNNkln2πmAU(Nh)2+2=kTln2πmAU(Nh)2+2kTN(Nh)22πmAU×2πnAUh2×2N3=kTln2mmAU(Nh)2+2+2kT=kTln2mmAU(Nh)2+22=kTln2mmAU(Nh)2=kTln2mmA(NkT)(Nh)2=kTlnVN2πmLTN23/2

04

Conclusion

The temperature, pressure and entropy are given by:

T=UNkP=NkTAμ=kTlnVN2πmkTh232

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a monatomic ideal gas that lives at a height z above sea level, so each molecule has potential energy mgzin addition to its kinetic energy.

(a) Show that the chemical potential is the same as if the gas were at sea level, plus an additional term mgz:

μ(z)=-kTlnVN2πmkTh23/2+mgz.

(You can derive this result from either the definition μ=-T(S/N)U,Vor the formula μ=(U/N)S,V.

(b) Suppose you have two chunks of helium gas, one at sea level and one at height z, each having the same temperature and volume. Assuming that they are in diffusive equilibrium, show that the number of molecules in the higher chunk is

N(z)=N(0)e-mgz/kT

in agreement with the result of Problem 1.16.

When the sun is high in the sky, it delivers approximately 1000 watts of power to each square meter of earth's surface. The temperature of the surface of the sun is about 6000K, while that of the earth is about 300K.

(a) Estimate the entropy created in one year by the flow of solar heat onto a square meter of the earth.

(b) Suppose you plant grass on this square meter of earth. Some people might argue that the growth of the grass (or of any other living thing) violates the second law of thermodynamics, because disorderly nutrients are converted into an orderly life form. How would you respond?

In the text I showed that for an Einstein solid with three oscillators and three units of energy, the chemical potential is μ=-ϵ(where ϵis the size of an energy unit and we treat each oscillator as a "particle"). Suppose instead that the solid has three oscillators and four units of energy. How does the chemical potential then compare to -ϵ ? (Don't try to get an actual value for the chemical potential; just explain whether it is more or less than -ϵ.)

Can a "miserly" system, with a concave-up entropy-energy graph, ever be in stable thermal equilibrium with another system? Explain.

Consider an Einstein solid for which both N and q are much greater than 1. Think of each oscillator as a separate "particle."

(a) Show that the chemical potential is

role="math" localid="1646995468663" μ=-kTlnN+qN

(b) Discuss this result in the limits Nqand Nq, concentrating on the question of how much Sincreases when another particle carrying no energy is added to the system. Does the formula make intuitive sense?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free