Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Fill in the missing algebraic steps to derive equations 3.30, 3.31, and 3.33.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Thus the equations are derived to fill the missing steps.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

The equation for the temperature of magnets is given as:

1T=-12μBSN..(1)

Where,

T= temperature

B= magnetic field

μ= constant

S= entropy

N= number of up dipoles of the paramagnet

The entropy of the paramagnets from Stirling's approximation is given as:

S=kNlnN-NlnN-N-NlnN-N

The expression for the number of up dipoles of the paramagnet is given as:

N=N2-U2μB

Where,

N= total number of the spins

U= total energy of the paramagnets

The expression for the heat capacity in the magnetic field of the paramagnet is given as:

role="math" localid="1647337393137" CB=UT..(2)

Where,

CB= heat capacity in the magnetic field Bof the paramagnet.

02

Calculation

By substituting the value of entropy in equation (1), we get,

1T=k2μBN[NlnNNlnN(NN)ln(NN)]1T=k2μB[lnNNN+ln(NN)+NNNN]1T=k2μBlnNNN

Where,

k= Boltzmann's constant

By substituting N2-U2μBfor Nin the above expression, we get,

1T=k2μBlnN/2U/2μBNN/2U/2μB1T=k2μBln(NU/μBN+U/μB)

By taking exponential on both the sides in the above expression, it becomes,

e1/T=ek/2μBN-U/μBN+U/μB

On simplifying the above expression for the total energy of the paramagnets, it becomes,

N-UμB=e2μB/kTN+UμBUμB1+e2μB/kT=N1-e2μB/kTU=NμB1-e2μB/kT1+e2μB/kT

On multiplying the numerator and denominator of the right-hand side by e-μB/kTin the above expression, we get,

U=NμB(eμB/kTeμB/kTeμB/kT+eμB/kT)U=NμB(2sinh(μB/kT)2cosh(μB/kT))U=NμBtanh(μBkT)

By substituting this value in equation (2), we get,

CB=-NμBTtanhμBkTCB=-NμB1cosh2(μB/kT)μBk-T-2CB=Nk(μB/kT)2cosh2(μB/kT)

03

Final answer

The missing steps for calculating the temperature, total energy, and heat capacity of the paramagnet using Stirling's approximation of the entropy are shown.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In solid carbon monoxide, each CO molecule has two possible orientations: CO or OC. Assuming that these orientations are completely random (not quite true but close), calculate the residual entropy of a mole of carbon monoxide.

In Section 2.5 I quoted a theorem on the multiplicity of any system with only quadratic degrees of freedom: In the high-temperature limit where the number of units of energy is much larger than the number of degrees of freedom, the multiplicity of any such system is proportional to UNf/2, whereNf is the total number of degrees of freedom. Find an expression for the energy of such a system in terms of its temperature, and comment on the result. How can you tell that this formula forΩ cannot be valid when the total energy is very small?

When the sun is high in the sky, it delivers approximately 1000 watts of power to each square meter of earth's surface. The temperature of the surface of the sun is about 6000K, while that of the earth is about 300K.

(a) Estimate the entropy created in one year by the flow of solar heat onto a square meter of the earth.

(b) Suppose you plant grass on this square meter of earth. Some people might argue that the growth of the grass (or of any other living thing) violates the second law of thermodynamics, because disorderly nutrients are converted into an orderly life form. How would you respond?

What partial-derivative relation can you derive from the thermodynamic identity by considering a process that takes place at constant entropy? Does the resulting equation agree with what you already knew? Explain.

Experimental measurements of heat capacities are often represented in reference works as empirical formulas. For graphite, a formula that works well over a fairly wide range of temperatures is (for one mole)

CP=a+bT-cT2

where a=16.86J/K,b=4.77×10-3J/K2, and c=8.54×105J·K. Suppose, then, that a mole of graphite is heated at constant pressure from 298Kto 500K. Calculate the increase in its entropy during this process. Add on the tabulated value of S(298K)(from the back of this book) to obtain S(500K).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free