Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Effect of altitude on boiling water.

(a) Use the result of the previous problem and the data in Figure 5.11 to plot a graph of the vapor pressure of water between 50°C and 100°C. How well can you match the data at the two endpoints?

(b) Reading the graph backward, estimate the boiling temperature of water at each of the locations for which you determined the pressure in Problem 1.16. Explain why it takes longer to cook noodles when you're camping in the mountains.

(c) Show that the dependence of boiling temperature on altitude is very nearly (though not exactly) a linear function, and calculate the slope in degrees Celsius per thousand feet (or in degrees Celsius per kilometer).

Short Answer

Expert verified

a). The variation of vapour pressure of water between 50°Cand 100°Cis shown.

b). The estimate values of the boiling temperature of water for different altitudes is 73.5oC.

c). A graph to show the variation of the altitude with pressure.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given Information

The variation of vapour pressure of water between 50°C and 100°C.

02

Part (a): Step 2: Explanation

Write the expression for the vapor pressure.

P=Ke-LJRT

Here, Pis the vapour pressure, Kis a constant, Lis the latent heat, Ris universal gas constant and Tis the absolute temperature.

The values of latent heat of water at 50°Cand 100°Care 42.92×103J/moland 40.66×103J/mol. The value of latent heat for a temperature range between 50°Cand 100°Cis not constant.

Calculate the average value of latent heat.

L=12(42.92+40.66)×103J/mol

=41.79×103J/mol

03

Part (a) Step 3: Explanation

K=PeIIRT

Substitute 0.1234×105Pafor P,41.79×103J/molfor L,(8.314J/mol·K)for Rand 323Kfor Tin the above expression.

K=0.1234×105Pae41.79×103J/mol/((8.314J/mol·K)(323K))

=7.075×1010Pa

A graph to show the variation of pressure with respect to temperature.

04

Part (b) Step 4: Given Information

The estimated values of the boiling temperature of water for different altitudes.

05

Part (b) Step 5: Explanation

Write the expression for the vapour pressure.

P=Ke-LKT

Here, Pis the vapour pressure, Kis a constant, Lis the latent heat, Ris universal gas constant and Tis the absolute temperature.

Rearrange the above expression.

T=LRlnKPK

Convert the above temperature in centigrade unit.

Tc=LRlnKP-273C

06

Part (b) Step 6: Explanation 

Substitute 41.79×103J/molfor $L,(8.314J/mol·K) for Kand 0.844×105Pafor Pfor an altitude of 1430min the above expression.

Tc=41.79×103J/mol(8.314J/mol·K)ln7.005×1010pa0.844×105P2-273°C

localid="1651135640596" =73.5oC

07

Part (c) Step 7: Given Information

The variation of the dependency of boiling temperature of water on altitude.

08

Part (c) Step 8: Explanation

Write the expression for the Clausius-Clapeyron equation.

dPP=LRdTT2...(2)

Here, Pis the pressure, Lis the latent heat, Ris the universal gas constant and Tis the temperature.

Write the barometric equation.

dP=-MBPRTbdz(3)

Here, M is the molar mass, z is the value of the altitude and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

Substitute -MRKTbdzfor dPPin expression (2).

-MRRTbdz=LRdTT2

09

Part (c) Step 9: Explanation

Rearrange the above expression.

dTT2=-MgTbLdz

Integrate both sides of the above expression.

1T=-MgzTbL+C..(4)

Here, Cis the integrating constant.

At z=0the value of the boiling point is 373K.

Substitute 373Kfor Tand 0 for zin expression (4).

C=1373K

Substitute 0.029Kgfor M,9.8m·s-2for Tband 41.79×103J/molfor Land 2.681×10-3K-1for Cin expression (4).

T=1-0.09K89.8mss-(2×3K)41.79×103Nmolz+2.681×10-3K-1

=-12.403×10-8m-1K-1z+2.681×10-3K-1

A graph:

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Problems 3.30 and 3.31 you calculated the entropies of diamond and graphite at 500 K. Use these values to predict the slope of the graphite- diamond phase boundary at 500 K, and compare to Figure 5.17. Why is the slope almost constant at still higher temperatures? Why is the slope zero at T = 0?

What happens when you add salt to the ice bath in an ice cream maker? How is it possible for the temperature to spontaneously drop below 0"C? Explain in as much detail as you can.

How can diamond ever be more stable than graphite, when it has

less entropy? Explain how at high pressures the conversion of graphite to diamond

can increase the total entropy of the carbon plus its environment.

The enthalpy and Gibbs free energy, as defined in this section, give special treatment to mechanical (compression-expansion) work, -PdV. Analogous quantities can be defined for other kinds of work, for instance, magnetic work." Consider the situation shown in Figure 5.7, where a long solenoid ( Nturns, total length N) surrounds a magnetic specimen (perhaps a paramagnetic solid). If the magnetic field inside the specimen is Band its total magnetic moment is M, then we define an auxilliary field H(often called simply the magnetic field) by the relation

H1μ0B-MV,

where μ0is the "permeability of free space," 4π×10-7N/A2. Assuming cylindrical symmetry, all vectors must point either left or right, so we can drop the -symbols and agree that rightward is positive, leftward negative. From Ampere's law, one can also show that when the current in the wire is I, the Hfield inside the solenoid is NI/L, whether or not the specimen is present.

(a) Imagine making an infinitesimal change in the current in the wire, resulting in infinitesimal changes in B, M, and H. Use Faraday's law to show that the work required (from the power supply) to accomplish this change is Wtotal=VHdB. (Neglect the resistance of the wire.)

(b) Rewrite the result of part (a) in terms of Hand M, then subtract off the work that would be required even if the specimen were not present. If we define W, the work done on the system, to be what's left, show that W=μ0HdM.

(c) What is the thermodynamic identity for this system? (Include magnetic work but not mechanical work or particle flow.)

(d) How would you define analogues of the enthalpy and Gibbs free energy for a magnetic system? (The Helmholtz free energy is defined in the same way as for a mechanical system.) Derive the thermodynamic identities for each of these quantities, and discuss their interpretations.

The partial-derivative relations derived in Problems 1.46,3.33, and 5.12, plus a bit more partial-derivative trickery, can be used to derive a completely general relation between CPandCV.

(a) With the heat capacity expressions from Problem 3.33 in mind, first considerSto be a function of TandV.Expand dSin terms of the partial derivatives (S/T)Vand (S/V)T. Note that one of these derivatives is related toCV

(b) To bring in CP, considerlocalid="1648430264419" Vto be a function ofTand P and expand dV in terms of partial derivatives in a similar way. Plug this expression for dV into the result of part (a), then set dP=0and note that you have derived a nontrivial expression for (S/T)P. This derivative is related to CP, so you now have a formula for the difference CP-CV

(c) Write the remaining partial derivatives in terms of measurable quantities using a Maxwell relation and the result of Problem 1.46. Your final result should be

CP=CV+TVβ2κT

(d) Check that this formula gives the correct value of CP-CVfor an ideal gas.

(e) Use this formula to argue that CPcannot be less than CV.

(f) Use the data in Problem 1.46 to evaluateCP-CVfor water and for mercury at room temperature. By what percentage do the two heat capacities differ?

(g) Figure 1.14 shows measured values of CPfor three elemental solids, compared to predicted values of CV. It turns out that a graph of βvs.T for a solid has same general appearance as a graph of heat capacity. Use this fact to explain why CPand CVagree at low temperatures but diverge in the way they do at higher temperatures.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free