Chapter 5: 5.3 (page 155)
Use the data at the back of this book to verify the values of and quoted above for the lead-acid reaction 5.13.
Short Answer
The value of Gibbs free energy = -315.72 kJ.
Chapter 5: 5.3 (page 155)
Use the data at the back of this book to verify the values of and quoted above for the lead-acid reaction 5.13.
The value of Gibbs free energy = -315.72 kJ.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeOrdinarily, the partial pressure of water vapour in the air is less than the equilibrium vapour pressure at the ambient temperature; this is why a cup of water will spontaneously evaporate. The ratio of the partial pressure of water vapour to the equilibrium vapour pressure is called the relative humidity. When the relative humidity is 100%, so that water vapour in the atmosphere would be in diffusive equilibrium with a cup of liquid water, we say that the air is saturated. The dew point is the temperature at which the relative humidity would be 100%, for a given partial pressure of water vapour.
(a) Use the vapour pressure equation (Problem 5.35) and the data in Figure 5.11 to plot a graph of the vapour pressure of water from 0°C to 40°C. Notice that the vapour pressure approximately doubles for every 10° increase in temperature.
(b) Suppose that the temperature on a certain summer day is 30° C. What is the dew point if the relative humidity is 90%? What if the relative humidity is 40%?
The partial-derivative relations derived in Problems 1.46,3.33, and 5.12, plus a bit more partial-derivative trickery, can be used to derive a completely general relation between and.
(a) With the heat capacity expressions from Problem 3.33 in mind, first considerto be a function of andExpand in terms of the partial derivatives and . Note that one of these derivatives is related to
(b) To bring in , considerlocalid="1648430264419" to be a function ofand P and expand dV in terms of partial derivatives in a similar way. Plug this expression for dV into the result of part (a), then set and note that you have derived a nontrivial expression for . This derivative is related to , so you now have a formula for the difference
(c) Write the remaining partial derivatives in terms of measurable quantities using a Maxwell relation and the result of Problem 1.46. Your final result should be
(d) Check that this formula gives the correct value of for an ideal gas.
(e) Use this formula to argue that cannot be less than .
(f) Use the data in Problem 1.46 to evaluatefor water and for mercury at room temperature. By what percentage do the two heat capacities differ?
(g) Figure 1.14 shows measured values of for three elemental solids, compared to predicted values of . It turns out that a graph of vs.T for a solid has same general appearance as a graph of heat capacity. Use this fact to explain why and agree at low temperatures but diverge in the way they do at higher temperatures.
Use the data at the back of this book to verify the values of ΔH and ΔGquoted above for the lead-acid reaction 5.13.
At temp 298K and pressure 1 bar.
Derive the thermodynamic identity for (equation 5.23), and from it the three partial derivative relations 5.24.
By subtracting from localid="1648229964064" ,or,one can obtain four new thermodynamic potentials. Of the four, the most useful is the grand free energy (or grand potential),
(a) Derive the thermodynamic identity for , and the related formulas for the partial derivatives ofwith respect to, and
(b) Prove that, for a system in thermal and diffusive equilibrium (with a reservoir that can supply both energy and particles), tends to decrease.
(c) Prove that
(d) As a simple application, let the system be a single proton, which can be "occupied" either by a single electron (making a hydrogen atom, with energy ) or by none (with energy zero). Neglect the excited states of the atom and the two spin states of the electron, so that both the occupied and unoccupied states of the proton have zero entropy. Suppose that this proton is in the atmosphere of the sun, a reservoir with a temperature of and an electron concentration of about per cubic meter. Calculate for both the occupied and unoccupied states, to determine which is more stable under these conditions. To compute the chemical potential of the electrons, treat them as an ideal gas. At about what temperature would the occupied and unoccupied states be equally stable, for this value of the electron concentration? (As in Problem 5.20, the prediction for such a small system is only a probabilistic one.)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.