Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Paying high prices? A retailer entered into an exclusive agreement with a supplier who guaranteed to provide all products at competitive prices. To be sure the supplier honored the terms of the agreement, the retailer had an audit performed on a random sample of 25 invoices. The percent of purchases on each invoice for which an alternative supplier offered a lower price than the original supplier was recorded.17 For example, a data value

of 38 means that the price would be lower with a different supplier for 38% of the items on the invoice. A histogram and some numerical summaries of the data are shown here. The retailer would like to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean percent of purchases for which an alternative supplier offered lower prices is greater than 50% in the population of this company’s invoices.

a. State appropriate hypotheses for the retailer’s test. Be sure to define your parameter.

b. Check if the conditions for performing the test in part (a) are met.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part a)H0:μ<50H1:μ>50

Part b) Large sample condition is not satisfied.

Step by step solution

01

Part a) Step 1: Given information 

The claim is that mean is bigger than50%

02

Part a) Step 2: The objective is to explain the state appropriate hypothesis for the retailer's test 

The null hypothesis statement states that the population value is equal to the claim value:

H0:μ<50

The null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis is the claim. The null hypothesis asserts that the population means equals the value specified in the claim. If the claim is the null hypothesis, then the alternative hypothesis statement is the inverse of the null hypothesis.

H1:μ>50

μdenotes the average percentage of purchases for which an alternative supply provided lower prices.

03

Part b) Step 1: Given information

Given:

04

Part b) Step 2: The objective is to find the condition for performing the test in part (a) are met. 

Random, independent (10%condition), and Normal/ Large samples are the three conditions.

Random: Satisfied because the sample was chosen at random.

Independent: Satisfied, because the sample of 25invoices represents less than 10%of the total population of invoices.

Normal/large sample size: Not happy because the sample size of 25invoices is small and the distribution is skewed (as the highest bar in the histogram is to the right in the histogram).

Because the Normal/Large sample condition is not met, a hypothesis test for the population mean is not appropriate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fair coin? You want to determine if a coin is fair. So you toss it 10times and record the proportion of tosses that land “heads.” You would like to perform a test of H0:p=0.5versus Ha:p0.5, where p= the proportion of all tosses of the

coin that would land “heads.” Check if the conditions for performing the significance test are met.

Making conclusions A student performs a test of H0:μ=12versus Ha:μ12

at the α=0.05significance level and gets a P-value of 0.01. The

student writes: “Because the P-value is small, we reject H0. The data prove that Hais true.” Explain what is wrong with this conclusion.

Based on the P-value in Exercise 31, which of the following would be the most

appropriate conclusion?

a. Because the P-value is large, we reject H0. We have convincing evidence that more than 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

b. Because the P-value is large, we fail to reject H0. We have convincing evidence that more than 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

c. Because the P-value is large, we reject H0. We have convincing evidence that at most 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

d. Because the P-value is large, we fail to reject H0. We have convincing evidence that at most 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

e. Because the P-value is large, we fail to reject H0. We do not have convincing

evidence that more than 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

Fire the coach!A college president says, “More than two-thirds of the alumni support my firing of Coach Boggs.” The president’s statement is based on 200emails he has received from alumni in the past three months. The college’s athletic director wants to perform a test of H0:p=2/3versus Ha:p>2/3, where p= the true proportion of the college’s alumni who favor firing the coach. Check if the conditions for performing the significance test are met.

Don't argue Refer to Exercise 2. Yvonne finds that 96 of the 150 students (64%) say they rarely or never argue with friends. A significance test yields a P-value of0.0291 Interpret the P-value.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free