Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Better parking A local high school makes a change that should improve student

satisfaction with the parking situation. Before the change, 37%of the school’s students approved of the parking that was provided. After the change, the principal surveys an SRS of 200from the more than 2500students at the school. In all, 83students say that they approve of the new parking arrangement. The principal cites this as evidence that the change was effective.

a. Describe a Type I error and a Type II error in this setting, and give a possible

consequence of each.

b. Is there convincing evidence that the principal’s claim is true?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The change is not effective. When effective, it won't improve parking.

b. No evidence that principal's claim is true.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

It is given that claim is greater than 37%.

α=0.05

n=200

x=83

02

Type I and Type II Error

The claim is null or alternate hypothesis.

Null hypothesis: H0:p=37%=0.37

Alternate Hypothesis: H1:p>0.37

Once null hypothesis is true, type I error rejects the null hypothesis:

Evidence is present that students who approve of new parking is >0.37, when students who approve parking is actually 0.37

Conclusion is change was effective when it was actually not effective and it may lead to wastage of money.

Once null hypothesis is false, type II error fails to reject it:

No evidence is present that students who approve of new parking is really larger than 0.37.

Change is not effective. When it was, parking is not improved.

03

Checking if Principal's claim is true or not.

The condition of normality is satisfied as:

np0=200(0.37)=74and n1-p0=200(1-0.37)=126. Both are large than 10.

Conditions are satisfied, we can use hypothesis test.

Sample proportion is p^=xn=83200=0.415

Test static: z=p^-p0p01-p0n=0.415-0.370.37(1-0.37)200=1.32

Pvalue is P=P(z>1.32)

=1-P(Z<1.32)=1-0.9066=0.0934

Hence, P>0.05Fail to rejectH0.

No evidence that principal's claim is true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Home computersRefer to Exercise 35.

a. Explain why the sample result gives some evidence for the alternative hypothesis.

b. Calculate the standardized test statistic and P-value.

c. What conclusion would you make?

1 A software company is trying to decide whether to produce an upgrade of one of its programs. Customers would have to pay \(100 for the upgrade. For the upgrade to be profitable, the company must sell it to more than 20% of their customers. You contact a random sample of 60 customers and find that 16 would be willing to pay \)100 for the upgrade.

a. Do the sample data give convincing evidence that more than 20% of the company’s customers are willing to purchase the upgrade? Carry out an appropriate test at the α=0.05significance level.

b. Which would be a more serious mistake in this setting—a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

c. Suppose that 30% of the company’s customers would be willing to pay $100 for the upgrade. The power of the test to detect this fact is0.60. Interpret this value.

Do you Tweet? The Pew Internet and American Life Project asked a random sample of U.S. adults, “Do you ever … use Twitter or another service to share updates about yourself or to see updates about others?” According to Pew, the resulting 95% confidence interval is (0.123, 0.177).11 Based on the confidence interval, is there convincing evidence that the true proportion of U.S. adults who would say they use Twitter or another service to share updates differs from 0.17? Explain your reasoning.

Tests and confidence intervals The P-value for a two-sided test of the null hypothesis H0:μ=15is0.03

a. Does the 99% confidence interval for μ include 15? Why or why not?

b. Does the 95% confidence interval for μ include 15? Why or why not?

Ski jump When ski jumpers take off, the distance they fly varies considerably depending on their speed, skill, and wind conditions. Event organizers must position the landing area to allow for differences in the distances that the athletes fly. For a particular competition, the organizers estimate that the variation in distance flown by the athletes will be \(\sigma=10\) \(\sigma=10\) meters. An experienced jumper thinks that the organizers are underestimating the variation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free