Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Better parking A local high school makes a change that should improve student

satisfaction with the parking situation. Before the change, 37%of the school’s students approved of the parking that was provided. After the change, the principal surveys an SRS of 200from the more than 2500students at the school. In all, 83students say that they approve of the new parking arrangement. The principal cites this as evidence that the change was effective.

a. Describe a Type I error and a Type II error in this setting, and give a possible

consequence of each.

b. Is there convincing evidence that the principal’s claim is true?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The change is not effective. When effective, it won't improve parking.

b. No evidence that principal's claim is true.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

It is given that claim is greater than 37%.

α=0.05

n=200

x=83

02

Type I and Type II Error

The claim is null or alternate hypothesis.

Null hypothesis: H0:p=37%=0.37

Alternate Hypothesis: H1:p>0.37

Once null hypothesis is true, type I error rejects the null hypothesis:

Evidence is present that students who approve of new parking is >0.37, when students who approve parking is actually 0.37

Conclusion is change was effective when it was actually not effective and it may lead to wastage of money.

Once null hypothesis is false, type II error fails to reject it:

No evidence is present that students who approve of new parking is really larger than 0.37.

Change is not effective. When it was, parking is not improved.

03

Checking if Principal's claim is true or not.

The condition of normality is satisfied as:

np0=200(0.37)=74and n1-p0=200(1-0.37)=126. Both are large than 10.

Conditions are satisfied, we can use hypothesis test.

Sample proportion is p^=xn=83200=0.415

Test static: z=p^-p0p01-p0n=0.415-0.370.37(1-0.37)200=1.32

Pvalue is P=P(z>1.32)

=1-P(Z<1.32)=1-0.9066=0.0934

Hence, P>0.05Fail to rejectH0.

No evidence that principal's claim is true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Pressing pills Refer to Exercise 77.

a. Construct and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the true hardness μ of the tablets in this batch. Assume that the conditions for inference are met.

b. Explain why the interval in part (a) is consistent with the result of the test in Exercise 77.

How much juice? Refer to Exercise 3. The mean amount of liquid in the bottles is 179.6ml and the standard deviation is 1.3ml. A significance test yields a P-value of 0.0589. Interpret the P-value.

Pressing pills A drug manufacturer forms tablets by compressing a granular material that contains the active ingredient and various fillers. The hardness of a sample from each batch of tablets produced is measured to control the compression process. The target value for the hardness is μ=11.5The hardness data for a random sample of 20 tablets from one large batch are

Is there convincing evidence at the 5%level that the mean hardness of the tablets in this batch differs from the target value?

Don’t argue Refer to Exercises 2 and 12.

a. What conclusion would you make at the α=0.01 level?

b. Would your conclusion from part (a) change if a 5% significance level was used

instead? Explain your reasoning.

We want to be rich In a recent year, 73%of first-year college students responding to a national survey identified “being very well-off financially” as an important personal goal. A state university finds that 132of an SRS of 200of its first-year students say that this goal is important. Is there convincing evidence at the α=0.05significance level that the proportion of all first-year students at this university who think being very well-off is important differs from the national value of 73%?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free