Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Opening a restaurant You are thinking about opening a restaurant and are

searching for a good location. From research you have done, you know that the mean income of those living near the restaurant must be over \(85,000to support the type of upscale restaurant you wish to open. You decide to take a simple random sample of 50people living near one potential location. Based on the mean income of this sample, you will perform a test of

H0:μ=\)85,000

Ha:μ>$85,000

where μis the true mean income in the population of people who live near the restaurant. Describe a Type I error and a Type II error in this setting, and give a possible consequence of each.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Once null hypothesis H0is true, type Ierror is rejecting null hypothesis H0.

Once null hypothesis H0is false, type IIerror fail to reject null hypothesis H0

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

It is given that n=50

H0:μ=$85,000

H1:μ>$85,000

02

Explanation

Once null hypothesis H0is true, type one error is rejecting null hypothesis H0

We have convincing proof that mean financial gain of these living close to restaurant is larger than 85000once mean financial gain of these living close to restaurant is actually 85000.

Double consequence is that opening restaurant in this area where financial gain of people is not enough and hence restaurant can depart of business.

One null hypothesis H0is false, type IIerror fail to reject H0

There is not enough convincing proof that mean financial gain of these living close to restaurant is larger than 85000, once mean financial gain of these living close to restaurant is actually 85000.

Double consequence is that not opening restaurant in this area where financial gain of people is large enough and hence it can miss profitable location.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Making conclusions A student performs a test of H0:p=0.75versus Ha:p<0.75at α=0.05significance level and gets a P-value of 0.22

The student writes: “Because the P-value is large, we accept H0. The data provide convincing evidence that null hypothesis is true". Explain what is wrong with this conclusion.

Flu vaccine Refer to ExerciseR9.5. Of the 1000 adults who were given the vaccine, 43 got the flu. Do these data provide convincing evidence to support the company’s claim?

Based on the P-value in Exercise 31, which of the following would be the most

appropriate conclusion?

a. Because the P-value is large, we reject H0. We have convincing evidence that more than 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

b. Because the P-value is large, we fail to reject H0. We have convincing evidence that more than 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

c. Because the P-value is large, we reject H0. We have convincing evidence that at most 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

d. Because the P-value is large, we fail to reject H0. We have convincing evidence that at most 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

e. Because the P-value is large, we fail to reject H0. We do not have convincing

evidence that more than 50%of city residents support the tax increase.

Don’t argue Refer to Exercises 2 and 12.

a. What conclusion would you make at the α=0.01 level?

b. Would your conclusion from part (a) change if a 5% significance level was used

instead? Explain your reasoning.

Pressing pills Refer to Exercise 77.

a. Construct and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the true hardness μ of the tablets in this batch. Assume that the conditions for inference are met.

b. Explain why the interval in part (a) is consistent with the result of the test in Exercise 77.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free