Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

How much juice? Refer to Exercises 3 and 11 .

a. What conclusion would you make at the α=0.10α=0.10level?

b. Would your conclusion from part (a) change if a 5 \% significance level was used instead? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a)There is sufficient convincing evidence that the correct mean volume of liquid is different from 180millilitres.

Part (b)Yes,There is enough convincing evidence that the true mean volume of liquid is different from 180millilitres.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1:Given information

α=0.10α=0.10

02

Part (b) Step 2:Explaination

P=0.0589

α=0.10

Given claim is mean is180

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis statement is that the population proportion is equal to the value given in the claim. If the null hypothesis is the claim, then the alternative hypothesis statement is the opposite of the null hypothesis.

H0:μ=180

H1:μ180

If the P-value is smaller than the significance level α, then reject the null hypothesis:

0.0589<0.10RejectH0

There is sufficient convincing evidence that the correct mean volume of liquid is different from 180millilitres.

03

Part (b) Step 1:Given information

A5% significance level was used

04

Part (b) Step 2:Explaination

P=0.0589

α=0.10

Given claim of mean is180.

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis statement is that the population proportion is equal to the value given in the claim. If the null hypothesis is the claim, then the alternative hypothesis statement is the opposite of the null hypothesis.

H0:μ=180

H1:μ180

If the P-value is smaller than the significance level , then reject the null hypothesis:

0.0589<0.10RejectH0

There is enough convincing evidence that the true mean volume of liquid is different from 180millilitres. It is observed that the conclusion changed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Walking to school Refer to Exercise 36.

a. Explain why the sample result gives some evidence for the alternative hypothesis.

b. Calculate the standardized test statistic and P-value.

c. What conclusion would you make?

Members of the city council want to know if a majority of city residents supports a 1%increase in the sales tax to fund road repairs. To investigate, they survey a random sample of 300city residents and use the results to test the following hypotheses:

H0:p=0.50

Ha:p>0.50

where pis the proportion of all city residents who support a 1% increase in the sales tax to fund road repairs.

A Type I error in the context of this study occurs if the city council

a. finds convincing evidence that a majority of residents supports the tax increase, when in reality there isn’t convincing evidence that a majority supports the increase.

b. finds convincing evidence that a majority of residents supports the tax increase, when in reality at most 50%of city residents support the increase.

c. finds convincing evidence that a majority of residents supports the tax increase, when in reality more than 50%of city residents do support the increase.

d. does not find convincing evidence that a majority of residents supports the tax increase, when in reality more than 50%of city residents do support the increase.

More lefties?In the population of people in the United States, about 10% are left-handed. After bumping elbows at lunch with several left-handed students, Simon wondered if more than 10%of students at his school are left-handed. To investigate, he selected an SRS of 50students and found 8lefties (p=8/50=0.16).

To determine if these data provide convincing evidence that more than 10%of the students at Simon’s school are left-handed, 200trials of a simulation were conducted. Each dot in the graph shows the proportion of students that are left-handed in a random sample of 50students, assuming that each student has a 10%chance of being left handed.

a. State appropriate hypotheses for performing a significance test. Be sure to define the parameter of interest.

b. Use the simulation results to estimate the P-value of the test in part (a). Interpret the P-value.

c. What conclusion would you make?

Flu vaccine Refer to ExerciseR9.5. Of the 1000 adults who were given the vaccine, 43 got the flu. Do these data provide convincing evidence to support the company’s claim?

Fair coin? You want to determine if a coin is fair. So you toss it 10times and record the proportion of tosses that land “heads.” You would like to perform a test of H0:p=0.5versus Ha:p0.5, where p= the proportion of all tosses of the

coin that would land “heads.” Check if the conditions for performing the significance test are met.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free