Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Killing bacteria Expose marine bacteria to X-rays for time periods from 1to 15minutes. Here is a scatterplot showing the number of surviving bacteria (in hundreds) on a culture plate after each exposure time:


a. Below is a scatterplot of the natural logarithm of the number of surviving bacteria versus time. Based on this graph, explain why it would be reasonable to use an exponential model to describe the relationship between the count of bacteria and the time.


b). Here is the output from a linear regression analysis of the transformed data. Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Be sure to defne any variables you use.

c. Use your model to predict the number of surviving bacteria after 17minutes.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a). The scatter plot does not have much curvature.

b). The equation of the least-squaresegression line is lny^=5.97316-0.218425x.

c). The expected number of bacteria after 17 minutes is 9.58247 hundred bacteria or 958.247 bacteria.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given Information

Given data:

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

The scatter plot does not have much curvature, a linear model between the two variables of the scatter plot would be appropriate. As a result, using a linear relationship between ln(count)and time is reasonable.

ln(count)=a+b(time)

Taking the exponential

count=eln(count)=ea+b(time)=eaeb(time)
03

Part (b) Step 1: Given Information

Given data:

04

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation

General equation of a least square regression line:

y^=b0+b1x

In the row "constant" and the column "Coef" of the computer's output, the calculated constant b0is given.

b0=5.97316

In the row "Time" and the column "Coef" of the computer output, the slope b1is found.

b1=-0.218425

05

Part (b) Step 3: Explanation

Substituting the value of b0and b1:

y^=b0+b1x

y^=5.97316-0.218425x

Where xrepresents the current time and yis the ln (count)

lny^=5.97316-0.218425x
06

Part (c) Step 1: Given Information

Given data:

07

Part (c) Step 2: Explanation

Substituting the value of x:

lny^=5.97316-0.218425x

lny^=5.97316-0.218425(17)

lny^=2.259935

Taking the exponential

y^=elny^

=e2.259935

=9.58247

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How well do professional golfers putt from various distances to the hole? The scatterplot shows various distances to the hole (in feet) and the per cent of putts made at each distance for a sample of golfers.

The graphs show the results of two different transformations of the data. The first graph plots the natural logarithm of per cent made against distance. The second graph plots the natural logarithm of per cent made against the natural logarithm of distance.

a. Based on the scatterplots, would an exponential model or a power model provide a better description of the relationship between distance and per cent made? Justify your answer.

b. Here is computer output from a linear regression analysis of ln(per cent made) and distance. Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Be sure to define any variables you use.

c. Use your model from part (b) to predict the per cent made for putts of 21 feet.

d. Here is a residual plot for the linear regression in part (b). Do you expect your prediction in part (c) to be too large, too small, or about right? Justify your answer.

Exercises T12.4โ€“T12.8 refer to the following setting. An old saying in golf is โ€œYou drive for show and you putt for dough.โ€ The point is that good putting is more important than long driving for shooting low scores and hence winning money. To see if this is the case, data from a random sample of 69 of the nearly 1000 players on the PGA Tourโ€™s world money list are examined. The average number of putts per hole (fewer is better) and the playerโ€™s total winnings for the previous season are recorded and a least-squares regression line was fitted to the data. Assume the conditions for
inference about the slope are met. Here is computer output from the regression analysis:

T12.4 By about how much does the sample slope typically vary from the population slope in repeated random samples of n=69 golfers?
a. 7,897,179
b. 1,698,371
c. 3,023,782
d. 281,777
e. โˆ’4,139,198

Suppose that the mean weight of a certain breed of pig is 280pounds with a standard deviation of 80pounds. The distribution of weight for these pigs tends to be somewhat skewed to the right. A random sample of 100pigs is taken. Which of the following statements about the sampling distribution of the sample mean weight xis true?

a. It will be Normally distributed with a mean of 280pounds and a standard deviation of 80pounds.

b. It will be Normally distributed with a mean of 280pounds and a standard deviation of 8pounds.

c. It will be approximately Normally distributed with a mean of 280pounds and a standard deviation of80pounds.

d. It will be approximately Normally distributed with a mean of 280pounds and a standard deviation of 8pounds.

e. There is not enough information to determine the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution.

R12.5 Light intensity In a physics class, the intensity of a 100-watt light bulb was measured by a sensor at various distances from the light source. Here is a scatterplot of the data. Note that a candela is a unit of luminous intensity in the International System of Units.

Physics textbooks suggest that the relationship between light intensity y and distance x should follow an โ€œinverse square law,โ€ that is, a power law model of the form y=ax-2=a1x2. We transformed the distance measurements by squaring them and then taking their reciprocals. Here is some computer output and a residual plot from a least-squares regression analysis of the transformed data. Note that the horizontal axis on the residual plot displays predicted light intensity.

a. Did this transformation achieve linearity? Give appropriate evidence to justify your answer.
b. What is the equation of the least-squares regression line? Define any variables you use.
c. Predict the intensity of a 100-watt bulb at a distance of 2.1 meters.

The swinging pendulum Mrs. Hanrahan's precalculus class collected data on the length (in centimeters) of a pendulum and the time (in seconds) the pendulum took to complete one back-and-forth swing (called it's period). The theoretical relationship between a pendulum's length and its period is

period=2ฯ€glength

where gis a constant representing the acceleration due to gravity (in this case, g=980cm/s2g=980cm/s2). Here is a graph of the period versus length, length, along with output from a linear regression analysis using these variables.

a. Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Define any variables you use.

b. Use the model from part (a) to predict the period of a pendulum with length 80cm.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free