Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

AP4.41 The body’s natural electrical field helps wounds heal. If diabetes changes this field, it might explain why people with diabetes heal more slowly. A study of this idea compared randomly selected normal mice and randomly selected mice bred to spontaneously develop diabetes. The investigators attached sensors to the right hip and front feet of the mice and measured the difference in electrical potential (in millivolts) between these locations. Graphs of the data for each group reveal no outliers or strong skewness. The following computer output provides numerical summaries of the data.

Is there convincing evidence at the α=0.05 level that the mean electrical
potential differs for normal mice and mice with diabetes?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is convincing evidence that the mean electrical potential differs for normal mice and animals with diabetes at the α=0.05 level.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

To determine the convincing evidence at the α=0.05 level that the mean electrical potential differs for normal mice and mice with diabetes.

02

Explanation

Let, the given values as follows:
x¯1=13090
x¯2=10022
s1=4839
s2=2915
n1=24
n2=18
α=0.05
The difference in mean is the assertion that has been made.
The null hypotheses as follows:
H0:μ1=μ2

And the alternative hypotheses as follows:

H1:μ1μ2
Where,
The true mean electrical potential for normal mice is μ1.
Then the true mean electrical potential for mice with diabetes is μ2.
03

Explanation

Let's pretend that all of the test's requirements are met.
As a result, test statistics have the following value:
t=x¯1-x¯2-μ1-μ232n1+L22m2

=13090-10022-048399224+2915218

=2.550
Determine the degrees of freedom as follows:
df=minn1-1,n2-1
=min(24-1,18-1)
=17
Then, determine the P-value by the degrees of freedom as follows:
0.02<P<0.04
The null hypothesis is rejected when the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level. As a result,
P<0.05RejectH0
Therefore, there is convincing evidence that the mean electrical potential differs for normal mice and animals with diabetes at the α=0.05 level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The professor swims Here are data on the time (in minutes) Professor Moore takes to swim 2000yards and his pulse rate (beats per minute) after swimming on a random sample of 23days:

Is there convincing evidence of a negative linear relationship between Professor Moore’s swim time and his pulse rate in the population of days on which he swims2000yards?

Beer and BAC Refer to Exercise 5. Here is computer output from the least-squares regression analysis of the beer and blood alcohol data.

a. What is the estimate for β0? Interpret this value.

b. What is the estimate for β1? Interpret this value.

c. What is the estimate for σ? Interpret this value.

d. Give the standard error of the slope SEb1. Interpret this value.

Beer and BAC How well does the number of beers a person drinks predict his or her blood alcohol content (BAC)? Sixteen volunteers aged 21or older with an initial BAC of 0took part in a study to find out. Each volunteer drank a randomly assigned number of cans of beer. Thirty minutes later, a police officer measured their BAC. A least-squares regression analysis was performed on the data using x=number of beers and y=BAC. Here is a residual plot and a histogram of the residuals. Check whether the conditions for performing inference about the regression model are met.

Beer and BAC How well does the number of beers a person drinks predict his or her blood alcohol content (BAC)? Sixteen volunteers aged 21or older with an initial BAC of 0took part in a study to find out. Each volunteer drank a randomly assigned number of cans of beer. Thirty minutes later, a police officer measured their BAC. A least-squares regression analysis was performed on the data using x=number of beers and y=BAC. Here is a residual plot and a histogram of the residuals. Check whether the conditions for performing inference about the regression model are met.

a. Find the critical value for a 99%confidence interval for the slope of the true regression line. Then calculate the confidence interval.

b. Interpret the interval from part (a).

c. Explain the meaning of “localid="1654184305701" 99%confident” in this context

Here is computer output from the least-squares regression analysis of the beer and blood alcohol dat

Exercises T12.4–T12.8 refer to the following setting. An old saying in golf is “You drive for show and you putt for dough.” The point is that good putting is more important than long driving for shooting low scores and hence winning money. To see if this is the case, data from a random sample of 69 of the nearly 1000 players on the PGA Tour’s world money list are examined. The average number of putts per hole (fewer is better) and the player’s total winnings for the previous season are recorded and a least-squares regression line was fitted to the data. Assume the conditions for
inference about the slope are met. Here is computer output from the regression analysis:

T12.6 The P -value for the test in Exercise T12.5 is 0.0087. Which of the following is a correct interpretation of this result?
a. The probability there is no linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for these 69 players is 0.0087.
b. The probability there is no linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for all players on the PGA Tour’s world money list is 0.0087.
c. If there is no linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for the players in the sample, the probability of getting a random sample of 69 players that yields a least-squares regression line with a slope of −4,139,198 or less is 0.0087.
d. If there is no linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for the players on the PGA Tour’s world money list, the probability of getting a random sample of 69 players that yields a least-squares regression line with a slope of −4,139,198 or less is 0.0087.
e. The probability of making a Type I error is 0.0087.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free