Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Western lowland gorillas, whose main habitat is in central Africa, have a mean weight of 275pounds with a standard deviation of 40pounds. Capuchin monkeys, whose main habitat is Brazil and other parts of Latin America, have a mean weight of 6pounds with a standard deviation of 1.1pounds. Both distributions of weight are approximately Normally distributed. If a particular western lowland gorilla is known to weigh 345pounds, approximately how much would a capuchin monkey have to weigh, in pounds, to have the same standardized weight as the gorilla?

a. 4.08

b. 7.27

c. 7.93

d.8.20

e. There is not enough information to determine the weight of a capuchin monkey.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correct answer is option (c)7.93.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

For the gorilla

μ=275σ=40

For capuchin monkey

μ=6σ=1.1

02

Explanation

The average weight of western lowland gorillas and capuchin monkeys is given in the question, and both weight distributions are nearly normal. First, determine the gorilla's z-score, i.e.

z=345-27540=1.75

The capuchin monkey's z-score is now also 1.75. Because their weights are 1.75standard deviations from their respective averages, theirz-scores must be identical to have the same standardised weight. As a result, we'll solve for the capuchin monkey as follows:

From the given data

1.75=x-61.11.925=x-6x=7.9257.93

Option (c) is correct.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Lamb’s quarters is a common weed that interferes with the growth of corn. An agriculture researcher planted corn at the same rate in 16small plots of ground and then weeded the plots by hand to allow a fixed number of lamb’s quarters plants to grow in each meter of cornrow. The decision on how many of these plants to leave in each plot was made at random. No other weeds were allowed to grow. Here are the yields of corn (bushels per acre) in each of the plots:


Here is some computer output from a least-squares regression analysis of these data. Do these data provide convincing evidence at the α=0.05level that more lamb’s quarters reduce corn yield?


PredictorCoefSECoefTPConstant166.4832.72561.110.000Weedsper1.09870.57121.920.075meterS=7.97665R-Sq=20.9%R-Sq(adj)=15.3%

T12.12 Foresters are interested in predicting the amount of usable lumber they can harvest from various tree species. They collect data on the diameter at breast height (DBH) in inches and the yield in board feet of a random sample of 20 Ponderosa pine trees that have been harvested. (Note that a board foot is defined as a piece of lumber 12 inches by 12 inches by 1 inch.) Here is a scatterplot of the data.

a. Here is some computer output and a residual plot from a least-squares regression on these data. Explain why a linear model may not be appropriate in this case.

The foresters are considering two possible transformations of the original data: (1) cubing the diameter values or (2) taking the natural logarithm of the yield measurements. After transforming the data, a least-squares regression analysis is performed. Here is some computer output and a residual plot for each of the two possible regression models:

b. Use both models to predict the amount of usable lumber from a Ponderosa pine with diameter 30 inches.
c. Which of the predictions in part (b) seems more reliable? Give appropriate evidence to support your choice.

Prey attracts predators . Here is computer output from the least-squares regression analysis of the perch data

a. What is the estimate for β0? Interpret this value.

b. What is the estimate for β1? Interpret this value.

c. What is the estimate for σ? Interpret this value.

d. Give the standard error of the slope SEb1. Interpret this value.

Determining tree biomass It is easy to measure the diameter at breast height (in centimeters) of a tree. It’s hard to measure the total aboveground biomass (in kilograms) of a tree because to do this, you must cut and weigh the tree. Biomass is important for studies of ecology, so ecologists commonly estimate it using a power model. The following figure is a scatterplot of the natural logarithm of biomass against the natural logarithm of diameter at breast height (DBH) for 378trees in tropical rain forests. The least-squares regression line for the transformed data is lny=-2.00+2.42lnxlny^=-2.00+2.42lnx^

Use this model to estimate the biomass of a tropical tree 30cm in diameter.

The swinging pendulum Mrs. Hanrahan's precalculus class collected data on the length (in centimeters) of a pendulum and the time (in seconds) the pendulum took to complete one back-and-forth swing (called it's period). The theoretical relationship between a pendulum's length and its period is

period=2πglength

where gis a constant representing the acceleration due to gravity (in this case, g=980cm/s2g=980cm/s2). Here is a graph of the period versus length, length, along with output from a linear regression analysis using these variables.

a. Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Define any variables you use.

b. Use the model from part (a) to predict the period of a pendulum with length 80cm.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free