Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Could mud wrestling be the cause of a rash contracted by University of Washington students? Two physicians at the university’s student health center wondered about this when one male and six female students complained of rashes after participating in a mud-wrestling event. Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of students who participated in the event. The results, by gender, are summarized in the following table.

Here is some computer output for the preceding table. The output includes the observed counts, the expected counts, and the chi-square statistic.

From the chi-square test performed in this study, we may conclude that

a. there is convincing evidence of an association between the gender of an individual participating in the event and the development of a rash.

b. mud wrestling causes a rash, especially for women.

c. there is absolutely no evidence of any relationship between the gender of an individual participating in the event and the subsequent development of a rash.

d. development of a rash is a real possibility if you participate in mud wrestling, especially if you do so regularly.

e. the gender of the individual participating in the event and the development of a rash are independent.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correct answer is option (a) There is convincing evidence of an association between the gender of an individual participating in the event and the development of a rash.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given data is

02

Explanation

A study was done to see if mud wrestling could be the cause of a rash that University of Washington students had contracted. As a result of the possibilities, we may conclude that

Option (a): This can be determined because the chi-square test's null hypothesis claims that there is no correlation, whereas the alternative hypothesis states that there is.

Option (b): This can't be inferred because a chi-square test can only show association, not causation.

Option (c): This cannot be concluded because a sample always contains evidence.

Option (d): We can't draw any conclusions because we don't have any data on how often people participate in mud wrestling.

Option (e): This can't be concluded because the chi-square test just shows whether there's a link or not; it doesn't tell us if there's a link or not.

As a result, option (a) is the proper choice.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Boyle’s law Refers to Exercise 34. We took the logarithm (base 10) of the values for both volume and pressure. Here is some computer output from a linear regression analysis of the transformed data.


a. Based on the output, explain why it would be reasonable to use a power model to describe the relationship between pressure and volume.

b. Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Be sure to define any variables you use.

c. Use the model from part (b) to predict the pressure in the syringe when the volume is 17cubic centimeters.

Exercises T12.4–T12.8 refer to the following setting. An old saying in golf is “You drive for show and you putt for dough.” The point is that good putting is more important than long driving for shooting low scores and hence winning money. To see if this is the case, data from a random sample of 69 of the nearly 1000 players on the PGA Tour’s world money list are examined. The average number of putts per hole (fewer is better) and the player’s total winnings for the previous season are recorded and a least-squares regression line was fitted to the data. Assume the conditions for
inference about the slope are met. Here is computer output from the regression analysis:

T12.4 By about how much does the sample slope typically vary from the population slope in repeated random samples of n=69 golfers?
a. 7,897,179
b. 1,698,371
c. 3,023,782
d. 281,777
e. −4,139,198

T12.12 Foresters are interested in predicting the amount of usable lumber they can harvest from various tree species. They collect data on the diameter at breast height (DBH) in inches and the yield in board feet of a random sample of 20 Ponderosa pine trees that have been harvested. (Note that a board foot is defined as a piece of lumber 12 inches by 12 inches by 1 inch.) Here is a scatterplot of the data.

a. Here is some computer output and a residual plot from a least-squares regression on these data. Explain why a linear model may not be appropriate in this case.

The foresters are considering two possible transformations of the original data: (1) cubing the diameter values or (2) taking the natural logarithm of the yield measurements. After transforming the data, a least-squares regression analysis is performed. Here is some computer output and a residual plot for each of the two possible regression models:

b. Use both models to predict the amount of usable lumber from a Ponderosa pine with diameter 30 inches.
c. Which of the predictions in part (b) seems more reliable? Give appropriate evidence to support your choice.

Lamb’s quarters is a common weed that interferes with the growth of corn. An agriculture researcher planted corn at the same rate in 16small plots of ground and then weeded the plots by hand to allow a fixed number of lamb’s quarters plants to grow in each meter of cornrow. The decision on how many of these plants to leave in each plot was made at random. No other weeds were allowed to grow. Here are the yields of corn (bushels per acre) in each of the plots:


Here is some computer output from a least-squares regression analysis of these data. Do these data provide convincing evidence at the α=0.05level that more lamb’s quarters reduce corn yield?


PredictorCoefSECoefTPConstant166.4832.72561.110.000Weedsper1.09870.57121.920.075meterS=7.97665R-Sq=20.9%R-Sq(adj)=15.3%

A study of road rage asked random samples of 596men and 523women about their behavior while driving. Based on their answers, each respondent was assigned a road rage score on a scale of 0-20. The respondents were chosen by random-digit dialing of telephone numbers. Are the conditions for inference about a difference in means satisfied?

a. Maybe; the data came from independent random samples, but we should examine the data to check for Normality.

b. No; road rage scores on a scale of 0-20can’t be Normal.

c. No; a paired t-test should be used in this case.

d. Yes; the large sample sizes guarantee that the corresponding population distributions will be Normal.

e. Yes; we have two independent random samples and large sample sizes, and the10% condition is met.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free